GodStruth
Well-Known Member
From Rangers Review. Sounds good to me that we are negotiating with an eye on his injury
He won't be injured forever.We’ll out-Rangers ourselves if we sign our own injured player.
6 months with an option would be the same as January.Six month loan with option to buy in January for agreed price. Could be same as agreed last year
Only Rangers front player the opposition were scared of.I'm likely very much in the minority but, on what little we saw of him, I thought he was pretty average before his injury.
Yep, so same agreement but run from July - December6 months with an option would be the same as January.
What's in it for the selling team?Season loan with option to buy, not obligation.
I thought he looked very good. Hit the ground running and would only get better. Injury is a concern thoughOnly Rangers front player the opposition were scared of.
That's a wee bit harsh I think, but I also think others overhyped his performances.I'm likely very much in the minority but, on what little we saw of him, I thought he was pretty average before his injury.
Give them LammersWhat's in it for the selling team?
I wouldn't be against that at all mate.Give them Lammers
I'm likely very much in the minority but, on what little we saw of him, I thought he was pretty average before his injury.
I wouldn't be averse to another loan, I think that would be fair for all parties. We definitely shouldn't be making this permanent on the little game time he's had coupled with a serious injury.That's a wee bit harsh I think, but I also think others overhyped his performances.
I'd be happy take him on loan again, with a view to a purchase if he does well. I don't think he's done enough to splash out a sizeable fee just yet.
That’s good news!From Rangers Review. Sounds good to me that we are negotiating with an eye on his injury
He only scored once that I'm aware of. We should definitely look into him, but as a loan only.Watching a different player from the rest of us, he was very effective and scored some crackers.
I can understand people having reservations because of his injury but to say he was average…Deary me.I'm likely very much in the minority but, on what little we saw of him, I thought he was pretty average before his injury.
He scored 1 goal. To his credit, It was a good goal that came at an important time in the 5-0 game against Hearts.Watching a different player from the rest of us, he was very effective and scored some crackers.
Give them Lammers
Because of his injury I didn't see enough in the 300 odd minutes he played for us. Another loan would be the most sensible outcome here then we can hopefully get a proper assessment of him.I can understand people having reservations because of his injury but to say he was average…Deary me.
Lammers should be given a chance as the no.9Give them Lammers
Fair point. Given the injury and the fact we didn't get enough time to juxge him during his loan its all about getting the best deal for RangersBecause of his injury I didn't see enough in the 300 odd minutes he played for us. Another loan would be the most sensible outcome here then we can hopefully get a proper assessment of him.
An extension to the loan would be my preferred option but I think we saw enough in his few appearances to say that he is a talent.Wouldn’t be averse to doing a season long loan if it was an option, we’ve barely been able to have a look at him in order to justify any significant outlay
Very very goodLooked good before his injury
This is the sensible position to take.He looked promising but as usual folk were going over the top with their praise. Worth taking him on loan again though to get another look.