Robbie Neilson: it was a red card but could the ref handle it differently? maybe

This opinion after Stewart saying it was definitely a foul on Gordon beggars belief. Made so much worse by nobody asking their reasoning behind such comments.
 
What a dick. So admits it was a red card but thinks the ref should have let him off with it - why? Because it's against Rangers?
 
It was a red card, but the ref could have let him off ? How would football work like that?
It is the Scottish football mentality in a nutshell.
Rangers = Don't deserve a fair crack at the whip.
If it was Lundstram, Morelos, Jack...
The media would be demanding a 10 match ban.
 
In his defence, he does say it’s a red card which was 100% the right call by the ref.

Every poster so far is aware of that. Most people are questioning if he's saying the Ref got it right, why is saying about could have handled it differently?
 
He’s basically alluding to the assault being let go as it’s against Rangers and that the ref could’ve booked the player (or not) without retribution.
 
Back
Top