Only if you make a genuine attempt to play the ball I believe. As in, if you went into a tackle, missed the ball but fouled the player, then it'd be a penalty only.Is there not some stupid double punishment thing?
Put Sirblueballs would rather go on and on at Rangers fans. "Interesting" character.Miller went on and on and on about it
The new Fantabaws!Is Miller thick?he aknowledged it was within the rules but then questioned the rules,he's starting to do my head in with his supposed impartiality.and that fukn accent.
They all agreed that the rule is harsh but it is the rule so it's a red.so who on Sky said it was harsh then?
He didn't.The only thing dubious was the penalty not being retaken. The keeper clearly came off his line
Jump the dykes are always the worst.Biggest Fanny of them all at that moment
- Kenny Miller didn’t take that cu* t to long.
Stand corrected. Only seen it in real timeHe didn't.
Tv pictures clearly show his feet on the line.
Calm down petal.You two are sad
Miller was absolutely drumming up controversy around it
Pair of sad acts
Jumping into threads being raging where others are not raging and accusing others of the same
Hypocritical sad acts
The Rangers fans on here who delight in digging up posters for asking legitimate questions are a right collection of odd balls
He's slapped the ball off the line
No need to suggest anything was harsh about a 100% correct decision where no comment would have been made had we not been involved
Pair of weirdos
Trio if you include Miller
Indeed, and it wasn't even a close call. A yard onside easily.Red card all day, every day.
Again, we needed VAR to make the decision because the ref gave offside initially
Wanker trying too hard to be liked again by the rheptile fans. Fu*k him and them they can have him.Jump the dykes are always the worst.
The guy on the Brighton villa game banging on about clear and obvious for the Brighton goal ruled off. That's not how offsides work. You are on or off.Soft penalties, harsh red cards, and just offside don't actually exist - these are all binary concepts that get spun into media talking points.
I repeat. Miller attempted to court controversy around it by repeatedly going on about it beyond the "its definitely the correct decision" that was all that was requiredCalm down petal.
I repeat no one suggested the decision was incorrect, only that they think the law is harsh.
Michael Stewart isn't on SkyThe goal for Sky is not to provide intelligent, reasonable and insightful coverage of games. The goal is to generate clips and social media posts that will be liked, shared, commented on, that will lead to days of media coverage on "here's what Neville/Carragher/Michael Stewart said about a penalty/VAR decision." Then Sky uses those engagement stats to attract advertisers.
Controversy and rage-posting generates far more engagement than honest discussion. So it's virtually written into the Sky script before a match even kicks off that there must be at least one refereeing or VAR call that their pundits will label as unjust or controversial. No matter how embarrassing it is for pundits to pretend they think the Killie player was hard done by, they are going to tell you that's what happened.
It's very sad and making sports broadcasting brutal, particularly in ScotlandThe goal for Sky is not to provide intelligent, reasonable and insightful coverage of games. The goal is to generate clips and social media posts that will be liked, shared, commented on, that will lead to days of media coverage on "here's what Neville/Carragher/Michael Stewart said about a penalty/VAR decision." Then Sky uses those engagement stats to attract advertisers.
Controversy and rage-posting generates far more engagement than honest discussion. So it's virtually written into the Sky script before a match even kicks off that there must be at least one refereeing or VAR call that their pundits will label as unjust or controversial. No matter how embarrassing it is for pundits to pretend they think the Killie player was hard done by, they are going to tell you that's what happened.
A ban for derailment awaits so this is my last comment.I repeat. Miller attempted to court controversy around it by repeatedly going on about it beyond the "its definitely the correct decision" that was all that was required
But you keep attacking Rangers fans, clearly gets you off somehow
And he got wrong in real time. Useless caaantThe easiest red card that fanny with the whistle will have in his career.
A ban for derailment awaits so this is my last comment.
No one on Sky said it was a wrong decision.
Not one
Enjoy your Sunday and mind your ticker.
Only a yellow if it’s a legitimate attempt to get the ball.Preventing a clear goal-scoring opportunity is punishable by a penalty kick and a yellow card. Preventing a goal by handling the ball on the goal-line takes the offence to a different dimension. The ref had no option but to show the red card.
Only if making a GENUINE attempt for the ball. LegallyIs there not some stupid double punishment thing?
He’s getting worse every week.Biggest Fanny of them all at that moment
- Kenny Miller didn’t take that cu* t to long.
Nothing dubious about it. Bomber on RTV, for once, was talking pish. The 'keepers right foot came forward off the line but the left foot didn't. All that is required is that one foot remains on the line.The only thing dubious was the penalty not being retaken. The keeper clearly came off his line
I think they get told that on day one of Ref University, maybe he forgotStopping a goal with your arm on the goal line has been a red card as long as I can remember.
It was a penalty and a red card because that’s what the law states. Still you’d be very disappointed to be sent off for that.Just back from the game watching it back and they are saying it was a harsh red card he stopped the ball on the line its the reddist of reds
And against us.Killie will feel hard done by considering what the rat faced right back from celtic got away with against them.
OK but you understand the point. He plays the same role for the BBC or wherever else he appears.Michael Stewart isn't on Sky
Of course I do m8OK but you understand the point. He plays the same role for the BBC or wherever else he appears.
I think it’s a harsh rule, he clearly didn’t mean it. But by the letter of the law it’s a red because it stops the ball going into the net.Just back from the game watching it back and they are saying it was a harsh red card he stopped the ball on the line its the reddist of reds
As long as a part of the goalkeepers foot is on the line at the point the ball is struck there is nothing wrong.The only thing dubious was the penalty not being retaken. The keeper clearly came off his line
Every one of the Sky pundits said the law is harsh, but it is the law so a definite red.
Sorry but nothing to get ragin about here.
It stops the ball going into the net, it’s not harsh at all.I think it’s a harsh rule, he clearly didn’t mean it. But by the letter of the law it’s a red because it stops the ball going into the net.
But if it was up to me if think he clearly doesn’t mean it and I’m the referee I should have the decision to say it’s a penalty and penalty only.
He clearly doesn’t mean it so aye it is a harsh rule. If he means it then 100% a red card. Pretty sure you and the majority on here would be saying otherwise if it’s the other way about.It stops the ball going into the net, it’s not harsh at all.