Is it actually true that they can only look at certain angles and NOT any stills or slow mo replays?
That was on here and I laughed at the superb piss take but guy at football repeated it yesterday.
How can they seriously have a process whereby everyone in Scotland already knows Alfie didn't dive and it was a penalty, yet next day uphold his booking saying they can't use same pictures media, fans and club use?!?
How archaic is that?! Is it from Victorian era?
I've got an idea, why doen't the club issue a statement describing how the process works from the club's perspective.
They could begin by stating that after the Morelos appeal was rejected the club have had numerous questions from supporters about how the process works especially as many pundits agreed and most neutral observers would agree that Morelos was unfairly cautioned.
They could then describe the process starting with the panel of 3 which is selected from a group of 100.
"We, The Club, are not allowed to know who the 100 are or how they were selected and in fact what qualifications or experience they have to judge football matters"
A panel of 3 from the hundred is formed ( according to the BBC description they don't even meet but have a sort of "conferencr call " ) but The Club is not allowed to know who the 3 are. Nor are we allowed to discuss what sort of allegiances these 100 may have.
The statement could go on to explain what evidence is reviewed and what is "not admissible" ( I seem to remember a couple of years ago the incident with Andy Webster and John Hartson was not admissible because it was caught on the club's own video and didn't come from a broadcast partner "official" recording )
And so on, you get the gist of the idea, The Club could flesh it out a bit.
It could end with "In the interests of Sporting Integrity we should be told.