The corrupt decisions that have gone against Rangers in our recent matches against Celtic
- Thread starter ThorntonMM
- Start date
I can usually eventually get over dodgy decisions that have gone against us but the decision to disallow the Dessers/Roofe goal has really got under my skin...and don't forget Maeda totally wiping out Cantwell in their penalty box leading to him being out the game for weeks and nothing given.
These two decisions will probably cost us the league this season!
These two decisions will probably cost us the league this season!
The club are not aggressive enough defending itself but it's hard when the institutionalised cheating is condoned by governing body and media alike. They are all part of it.
Bastards.
Bastards.
Last edited:
douzpwa
Well-Known Member
It is something we all know! If I had the money and power at Rangers I would smash the Sfa to Court if need be to rectify blatant dodgy decisions that have cost us millions! The Ring Fc (Celtic) don't need to do well in Europe they just have to see us do great runs then they and their corrupt nip in and take the prize that we built!
douzpwa
Well-Known Member
Sutton also put a target on Morelos's back that led this young lad to be abused on and off the park by The Rings propaganda machine!
Feck The Rings
Numanloyal
Well-Known Member
I’d love to see the mainstream media adopt some of these facts but we all know the majority of them brown nose Liewells gang
Today is normally the day the media start their build up.
Trawling through old grainy black and white vhs tapes to find a controversial decision we got in a game v them, but in that absence adopt the default penalty to Rangers mantra.
Bear all
Well-Known Member
VAR has them ahead of us we all had bad patches ours came at a really bad time but they have had VAR in their favour all season,3 game changing decisions against us not to mention the amount of times they should have been down to 10 men sadly Saturday won’t be any different.
Ref Watch: Celtic, Rangers, Nottingham Forest and Liverpool controversy analysed by Dermot Gallagher
Dermot Gallagher, Stephen Warnock and Sue Smith dissect the controversial incidents from the weekends football; penalties and red cards assessed as Celtic and Rangers both suffer defeat; Liverpools late winner after incorrect drop ball also analysed
How Alan Muir Referee and Euan Anderson VAR were both allowed to continue officiating after ignoring the red card tackle by Casey tells you how corrupt the SFA is.
That incident cost us three points v Motherwell, no doubt about it, but it should never have been missed in these days of VAR.
Virgil Hilts
Well-Known Member
81.25% of the penalties that Rangers have been awarded this season have been missed by the 4 onfield officials.
They got less than 1 in 5 correct and that obviously excludes the Collum facade.
They got less than 1 in 5 correct and that obviously excludes the Collum facade.
tazzabear
Well-Known Member
This might be true but it’s against UEFA’s rules to take an association to court and they are pretty much, above the law.
weetam3106
Well-Known Member
They don’t even bother to hide it now. Rangers do nothing about it anyway.
steven allen
Well-Known Member
4 var decisions in the past 4 old firm games have cost usI can usually eventually get over dodgy decisions that have gone against us but the decision to disallow the Dessers/Roofe goal has really got under my skin...and don't forget Maeda totally wiping out Cantwell in their penalty box leading to him being out the game for weeks and nothing given.
These two decisions will probably cost us the league this season!
Only God Forgives
Well-Known Member
That Alien Johnstone punching the ball out of play in the last game at the Knew Camp got to me especially at the time everyone saw it in the stadium and at home saw him hit out with his fist, it was a penalty but the ref buried his head in the sand and gollumn and co behind Var didn't think anything wrong about it so gives a goal kick to Hart!!
At half time it was clarified that Sima was just offside, but they tried to do us over when the incident happened no doubt about it.
At half time it was clarified that Sima was just offside, but they tried to do us over when the incident happened no doubt about it.
Last edited:
Sensiblesteve
Well-Known Member
It’s never been clarified that Sima was offside , the squiggly line drawer was 20 mins behind play and the still showing him offside is after the ball has been played
It stank to the high heavens at the time and it still stinks now
We used to get 6 different angles of Morelos going for a tackle in case they could manipulate a Red card , where are all these different angles with multiple replays all slowed down
Only God Forgives
Well-Known Member
They managed to get away with it with that so called offside decision.
Also not sure whether their first goal came from a corner that swung out of play. It was an outswinging corner that Sima headered (into danger) from less than a foot from the near post. Again, no angles shown to confirm or refute; no aspersions cast by the "neutral" Sky commentary team, no indication of a VAR check.
* disdainI honestly thought with the introduction of VAR there was no way the obvious corruption could continue, how wrong was I.
It’s just another tool they can manipulate to suit their agenda.
The level of distain shown by the rancid SFA in the response to these incidents further highlighted the corruption from within the organisation.
Bemused Rangers to demand answers from SFA over disallowed goal against Celtic
The Ibrox club will be contacting the refereeing department in due course.www.heraldscotland.com
SFA 'disappointed' with Rangers in VAR row
The Scottish FA says it is "disappointed" at Rangers' statements after the club's meeting with the governing body over the Old Firm VAR row.www.bbc.co.uk
Also when you consider the fact someone from the SFA took it upon themselves to draw squint lines 30 minutes after an incident took place that totally disregarded the entire VAR protocols when there was a handball by a Celtic player in his own box merely confirmed the game is run for one team and one team only.
muttley
Well-Known Member
This mythical Sima offside was quickly wheeled out after the game and repeated ad nauseum as a distraction from the clear cheating which went on.
Trueblue76
Well-Known Member
Awaiting another fucking over by father collum on Saturday no matter how well we play.
Twiggyrfc1
Well-Known Member
Will be able to add a few more to list after Saturday
The fact that the image (with Sima’s foot clearly distorted) that was circulated 30 minutes after the event was generated by someone else in the SFA but not on VAR shows there was a collusion to cover up.
muttley
Well-Known Member
The Sima graphic was like something done by a kid with Etch-a-Sketch.
It was embarrassing.
We will never get a big decision against that lot that costs them points or a trophy.
Bknowe
Well-Known Member
Try the 60th minute of the game mate.
Sky's broadcast team unanimously panned the decision. The 'offside' was found 15 mins into the 2nd half to ensure that Collum's cheating erse was covered.
Crocker even let the cat out of the bag that there was no offside discussed at the time of the Johnston handball as he made a comment along the lines of 'it would have been nice to have known that earlier' as he gets to hear the VAR chat so he can let the viewers know that there's a check going on.
muttley
Well-Known Member
Like every other act of cheating by those scum, its quickly forgotten by the media.
Bluethruandthru
Well-Known Member
Not even close.
Bluethruandthru
Well-Known Member
Exactly which is why the situation will never change.
You put you're heart and soul into supporting this club, while the people who run it categorically reuse to address the elephant in the room with any degree of conviction.
Bknowe
Well-Known Member
Flip the incident on its head.
A 'Rangers supporting' VAR says nothing to see and doesn't mention to the referee.
Incident is discussed at length during HT by pundits and there would be lots of anger.
SFA 'find an offside' in the buildup that is passed on to broadcasters 15mins into the 2nd half as a way to shut down discussion of initial incident and error.
How do Celtic react?
muttley
Well-Known Member
They'd never cease from going on about it, and the officials involved would already be gone, all of them.
They'd make sure of it.
Bknowe
Well-Known Member
Match Officials would be gone (never mind the VAR going on to ref the last Old Firm of the season with 3pts of a difference between teams)
Crawford Allan would have been chased.
Ian Maxwell would have been under pressure to resign
VAR would be scrapped and all 'Rangers supporting refs' banned from officiating.
RFCStu
Well-Known Member
How exactly do you propose the club do this? If you want something said in the public domain the only way it gains proper attention is through mainstream media. The main players on that front in Scotland are BBC, STV, Sky, The Record, and The Sun. All these organisations are literally crammed with employees who utterly despise us. It doesn't matter what we say or how we say it as a Michael Stewart, Chris Sutton, or some other Rangers hating journo will be wheeled out to discredit it and laugh at it. We've got to a point where even blatant decisions for us are being labelled as contentious by pundits on all outlets.
van Rottenbottom
Active Member
The club meekly accepting these decisions is what makes sure nothing will ever change.
Bluethruandthru
Well-Known Member
Ok so all is lost then? There's nothing to be done. We just continue to suck it up, is that it?
Let me ask you this. It's not so very long ago I clearly remember every manky b*****d and his dug make every complaint you've listed there regards us.....the establishment club this.... Masonic media / SFA that, we the oppressed..... bla bla bla. How do you think they managed to turn things full circle in their favour and in such a short space of time?
weetam3106
Well-Known Member
What is needed is something akin to the hive mind of the shellick social media and all who contributes to it. They bang the drum and the whole system dances to their tune.
It does help that Celtic control the editorial content on clyde SSB, radio Scotland, sportscene and all the papers in the country but for example, where was the public outcry over McGregors stamp against Hearts? Had that been Cantwell the first minister (even the new arsepiece) would have found time to comment on it.
Our PR team think they are in a corner shop and posting shitty wee cards outside the shop thinking that this will get the message across, but what’s needed is a holistic media strategy one that embraces fans groups, all our voices and triggers the message in every important media outlet.
Fucking wake up Rangers the game isn’t only won on the pitch, they started influencing the outcome of Saturday a while back.
Just watch the SFA or var suck their balls dry by 1400 and listen as radio Scotland wank themselves into a dramatic frenzy as they gush over Brrrrrrendan whilst they sit in deathly silence over anything good that our team does. It’s not paranoia it’s COUNTING and by counting I’m also referring to adding up all the past experiences we have had to endure.
They have the game off the park sewn up. If we win it truly will be against ALL the odds, odds not just based on their current form or their sudden availability of key players but the whole environment. That agenda, those messages influence every aspect of the game and it gives them the edge every time. Every time.
It does help that Celtic control the editorial content on clyde SSB, radio Scotland, sportscene and all the papers in the country but for example, where was the public outcry over McGregors stamp against Hearts? Had that been Cantwell the first minister (even the new arsepiece) would have found time to comment on it.
Our PR team think they are in a corner shop and posting shitty wee cards outside the shop thinking that this will get the message across, but what’s needed is a holistic media strategy one that embraces fans groups, all our voices and triggers the message in every important media outlet.
Fucking wake up Rangers the game isn’t only won on the pitch, they started influencing the outcome of Saturday a while back.
Just watch the SFA or var suck their balls dry by 1400 and listen as radio Scotland wank themselves into a dramatic frenzy as they gush over Brrrrrrendan whilst they sit in deathly silence over anything good that our team does. It’s not paranoia it’s COUNTING and by counting I’m also referring to adding up all the past experiences we have had to endure.
They have the game off the park sewn up. If we win it truly will be against ALL the odds, odds not just based on their current form or their sudden availability of key players but the whole environment. That agenda, those messages influence every aspect of the game and it gives them the edge every time. Every time.
Bluenose Whistler
Well-Known Member
Our demise to the bottom tier and gradual build up to the top again without Euro money etc, lack of quality signings to compete for silverware, and whilst we were out the picture Liewell putting into position his placeman, at both SPFL and SFA level.
Last edited:
Bluenose Whistler
Well-Known Member
SSB and the DR especially no more than a scum fanzine. Before the last OF game Wan ba' told a story regards not getting a penalty in an OF game whilst a certain ref was in charge of course did not name him and the media rep never asked for it either but the damage is done and gets their fans even more paranoid and more likely to put pressure or worse on refs IF a bad result . Just like Paul Elliot and the banana story Cellic would have taken that alleged ref comment all the way at the time but nothing was ever reported and historically we all know how they play the victim card at every opportunity to gain an advantage... a bit part player collapses and dies on a pitch lets postpone a big game whilst we have McGeady injured and Nakamura not quite match fit, but when a former player,coach ,manager & enabler died 'Let's go out and win this League for him!'
Rabbie Burns had the measure of this mhob years before , 'sleekit, cowardly TIMorous bheasties
Bluethruandthru
Well-Known Member
On the money.
Blueranger45
Well-Known Member
the answer to this whole thread unfortunately
our board obviously love being shafted out of millions and then having to find ways to make up that money by investments or selling players to make us worse. I know I'll get the "tinfoil brigade" in here but if we were able to win the first 3 matches against them and we've had plenty of decisions to stop that happening, we'd be going there to potentially win the title rather than the situation we find ourselves in
El Jock Grande Sabia
Well-Known Member
The reason they said no penalty - if i remember correctly - was that they deemed the extra from V's hand had made a natural movement, so no foul had been perpetrated.
If that was the case, why was it a goal kick & not a corner as the lizard looking c@nt was the last to touch (quite literally!) the ball before it went out of play?
Kinghornloyal
Well-Known Member
Cause VAR can't change a goal kick to a corner
I didn't click the link but was wondering if any of the decisions against us v them have made Amy lists of VAR/Ref mistakes. I can bet none of them have. So the ref panel have decided no mistakes were made in those games.
Coza
Well-Known Member
A rangers black arts department. A sunk cost that will initially only make small inroads but over the years will slowly start to pay for itself as we can see with their propaganda machine.
Blueranger45
Well-Known Member
people go on about the VAR penalty from the 2nd game but I'm more annoyed at the lack of reds they got in that game, could quite easily have been down to 9 at HT if a proper ref was doing the job
for the stats people, when was the last time they had a player sent off at Parkhead against us in a game? surely it's not Riseth in their "shame game" which would be 1999?
for the stats people, when was the last time they had a player sent off at Parkhead against us in a game? surely it's not Riseth in their "shame game" which would be 1999?
The_red_rocket
Well-Known Member
It’ll be cardinal Clancy for the Scottish Cup final, then we’ll have to worry.
weetam3106
Well-Known Member
It would build its own momentum and soon when the mass is big enough it becomes self driven. They are masters at it and could teach Russian and Chinese hackers a thing or two.
1BrianLaudrup
Well-Known Member
I saw it again yesterday and still can't believe it wasn't given. That (the initial decision then the "offside" explanation 45 minutes later) was one of the most blatantly corrupt things I've seen in 35 years watching football.
And it shows you the power of narrative control and propaganda: because the media in Scotland choose to forget about it and frame it as "controversial" (which implies debatable - it's not). If the media was doing its job we would be talking about officials visibly abusing their positions to hand a decisive advantage to one team, repercussions, sackings and an acknowledgment that this was a scandal and a blight on Scottish football's already flimsy reputation in world football.
As it is, the Scottish media shrugs its shoulders collectively, that's good enough for everyone in Scotland who hates Rangers, and nobody outside of Scotland gives enough of a shit to care.
El Jock Grande Sabia
Well-Known Member
Just like it can't be used to award a free kick?
DovRob
Well-Known Member
An offside decision that saw the game restart with a goal kick. No way are we playing on an even gameboard
deedle
Well-Known Member
We’re not going to change the character of the Scottish MSM overnight but the club should be negotiating with one outlet for a more pro-Rangers stance - much the way Celtic have the Record stitched up. Regardless of their own feelings, editors must know they are alienating many potential customers.
Those outlets that are irredeemably antagonistic such as BBC Scotland should be bodyswerved altogether. Action like this must be accompanied by a statement explaining why. I found it incomprehensible that we allowed the previous situation to drag on for years with no explanation given to the support. In fact, many were completely unaware.
At root, there appears to be a complete lack of conviction in dealing with the media or politics. We have people in charge who may have expertise in sales and marketing but who haven’t a clue about politics. This has to change if we are to get anywhere.
New media platforms are being exploited by fans and the club should be building arms-length relationships. How many fans will be aware of McGregor’s first-minute stamp on the Hearts player? The establishment media have essentially censored this story. When it appears on social media, it is linked to a user called ‘BJK’ - is that the best way of getting the message across?
Despite criticism, social media is a powerful tool - one that is resented by the establishment. Yet we are still not really making inroads here.
