At least a decade ago.
I saw the highlights of the game recently, while it was an absolute stonewaller, it should be noted that they already had a good 3 or 4 dives in the box.
When did we last have an incorrect game changing decision go in our favour?
- Thread starter Corriebear
- Start date
I saw the highlights of the game recently, while it was an absolute stonewaller, it should be noted that they already had a good 3 or 4 dives in the box.
PunkScott
Well-Known Member
I think he got the ball, Hill was nice enough to tell Rodgers he thought it was a penalty though.
I liked Clint
Brunosponytail
Well-Known Member
Your mad right enough.
that was never a penalty! The Hibs player fell onto Barasic but he never pulled him down or anything.
Mad John
Well-Known Member
sure thing
bearmind
Well-Known Member
I posted this on the 'Bobby Madden ref at Motherwell' thread but just as appropriate here.
I am totally convinced that one major reason why we are successful home and away in Europe this last three seasons is because of consistent and fair referreing without prejudice there. That is compared to playing in the SPL and Scottish Cups.
Some of the fouls against us e.g. on Sunday v Hibs would not have looked out of place in a kick boxing ring. No way in the main that such fouls are getting past a European referee. I sincerely hope that someone inside Ibrox is keeping a dossier on such fouls, decisions and referees. Although I very much doubt it.
It would be interesting to employ a referee from abroad to judge refereeing decisions in our Scottish games and versus European matches independently of course. I used to be a 'dignified silence man' but not anymore. Something (apart from the smell of the mhanks) stinks in the Scottish game.
The cynic in me believes that such referreing decisions will cost us the League.
I am totally convinced that one major reason why we are successful home and away in Europe this last three seasons is because of consistent and fair referreing without prejudice there. That is compared to playing in the SPL and Scottish Cups.
Some of the fouls against us e.g. on Sunday v Hibs would not have looked out of place in a kick boxing ring. No way in the main that such fouls are getting past a European referee. I sincerely hope that someone inside Ibrox is keeping a dossier on such fouls, decisions and referees. Although I very much doubt it.
It would be interesting to employ a referee from abroad to judge refereeing decisions in our Scottish games and versus European matches independently of course. I used to be a 'dignified silence man' but not anymore. Something (apart from the smell of the mhanks) stinks in the Scottish game.
The cynic in me believes that such referreing decisions will cost us the League.
steve1873
Well-Known Member
Except he did see it. There is a pic of him looking at it over his shoulder as he is jogging the other way. I have it saved on my one drive and will post it later to prove your little timmy lie wrong!
steve1873
Well-Known Member
R
RobbenHood
Guest
As said to the other poster, he’s already going down in that. Go and watch the clip
If you’re using still frames as evidence, give me 5 min and I’ll post a picture of when Stokes jumped into Davis and was given a penalty. That’s how it works, isn’t it?
steve1873
Well-Known Member
So you are provided with a picture of the foul occurring with he referee looilking at it and you maintain that he didn't see it because broadfoot was already on way down by the time that pic is taken? Hmmmm I think we shall add you to ignore list!
R
RobbenHood
Guest
I said he went down softly and dived, the picture proves nothing.
steve1873
Well-Known Member
It proves he seen it which you have maintained not to be the case.
Ruben Sosa
Well-Known Member
Opened this, flicked straight to the last page which appears to be mentalists talking about incidents from a decade ago.
Point proven I reckon, as nobody was saying the game was bent back then.
You took the rough with the smooth when it came to refereeing decisions. Now there is no smooth.
Point proven I reckon, as nobody was saying the game was bent back then.
You took the rough with the smooth when it came to refereeing decisions. Now there is no smooth.
R
RobbenHood
Guest
Ok, I’ll make it as simple as possible for you.
Broadfoot went down easily. The referee didn’t see the initial “contact” as it was behind him
The referee seen “contact” as Broadfoot was already going to ground where their CB had a hand on him
Had broadfoot not flung himself to the ground we wouldn’t have got the penalty. If the ref had seen it from start to finish I don’t believe we’d have got a penalty
That simple enough for you?
steve1873
Well-Known Member
Trying far, far too hard. Bye!
The picture shows the contact which disproves the idea that Broadfoot dived!
R
RobbenHood
Guest
You can dive into someone, there’ll then be contact (ala Stokes at Ibrox). Does that mean it’s a foul?
Behave
He's got both hands on Broadfoot FFS!
If Kirk dived into him (he didn't, that wasn't his direction of travel) how the hell does he get both hands up and onto Broadfoot while he is still upright?
That would take the kind of reactions only seen in superhero movies!
You've said the ref didn't see it, said he had his back to it, said Broadfoot dived, changed to 'it was soft' and now you have Broadfoot initiating the contact.
To even compare it to Stokes at Ibrox is utter lunacy.
Here's the video of the dive, you said you could take a still that makes it look like a penalty.
Be my guest.
Edgar4king
Active Member
In the game where a perfectly good run that put Alfie one on one was called offside but was in his own half??
BSPECIAL
Well-Known Member
Yes,The BLATANT offside according to the bitter rhat commentator mclean.Made him ill
Jonathan E
Well-Known Member
Well, according to one poster in this thread that would be Jorge Cadette's disallowed goal that would have meant we only beat them 3-2 instead of 3-1 twenty three years ago!
