Context: Not a Ross Wilson praise post.
To be honest, it goes beyond 'was the signing a successful player for Rangers'... and should take into consideration both value and profit.
The question really is: Which of Ross Wilson's signings were good for the business?
My opinion:
Hits | Misses | 50/50 | Too early to tell |
---|
Hagi
Bassey
McLaughlin
Defo
Balogun
Lundstram
Bacuna*
Colak
Lawrence** | Kamberi
Itten
Zungu
Simpson
Zukowski
Ramsey
Souttar | Roofe**
Diallo***
Sands
Wright***
Sakala*** | Matondo
Tillman
Yilmaz
Davies
Oforboh |
* Shite player but made a profit?
** Only if they remain injury free (or injured at a normal rate)
*** Value for money signing. If high wages would be a miss, but could still move to Hit.
If Wilson is to be judged on first-team signings, should we also be judging him on academy players such as:
Charlie Lindsay
Tony Weston
Charlie McCann
Juan Alegria
Zak Lovelace
As well as considering transfers away from Rangers (transfers only, not contract expiry or loan returns):
Correct decision | Correct decision, poor deal | Wrong decision |
---|
Grezda
Herrera
Holt
Polster
Docherty
McCrorie
Edmundson
Jones
Patterson
Bacuna
Itten
Hastie
Bassey
Middleton
Simpson
Katic | Dire Mebude*
Dapo Mebude*
Barker** | Aribo*** |
* Should have got more money
** Was leaving on a free best?
*** Should have sold earlier to get a higher fee
Finally, contracts:
Good management | Bad management | Neither good nor bad |
---|
Patterson*
Davis
McGregor
Tavernier
Balogun
Defoe
Kamara
McLaughlin
Lowry
Arfield | Balogun**
Goldson***
Aribo****
Kent****
Morelos**** | Firth |
* Got us a good fee
** Should have stayed
*** Took far too long to sort
**** Should have sold them earlier, for bigger profit