It will be that's the worst thing about it.Good statement but will no doubt be ignored by the shysters supposedly running the game as usual .
Cant hammer a minority shareholders group who do have a right to questionHow the clubs statement should have went....
It's ok, but it should name names and list players from other clubs who didn't get banned and compared them to Morelos and McGregor.
Better than the club statement but not strong enough for me.
How the clubs statement should have went....
The
They don’t need to name names, everyone with a passing interest in Scottish football knows they mean the Sportscene team as well as Burke and Brown (and McGinn).
It gives the greater credence when we are not shown to be only concerned with retribution for mentally challengeds.
But coincidently they are mentally challengeds.Power and McGinn don't play for the mentally challengeds.
But coincidently they are mentally challengeds.
Can't agree mate!Can the club please stop using C1872 as it's mouthpiece.
Did Lawell let Joe the Bhigot compose their words after 29th Dec?
Can't agree mate!
Celtic have been using "arms length" people and organisations for years to get their "official" message across and it's been highly effective!
Club1872 are doing a great job as a conduit to get across our point of view to both the authorities and the media.
As it happens I don't think they were quite as strong as I would have liked in this instance but in general I think they're doing exactly what I would expect of them.
I would say that it's improved slightly but you're right, it could be so much better!C1872 do some great work and have my support but this will be more or less ignored.
They can fine the club but it's much harder to avoid responding to an official statement.
I think you have perhaps inadvertently highlighted a very pertinent issue: Our media strategy isn't working. Although it's hard to engage with bodies who have no interest in common ground.
We need to follow this up.
Need to ensure this isn't forgotten.
The system is being entirely mismanaged intentionally.
They want the system destroyed now that we are back competing. Planned obsoletion. It's served its purpose.
Ensured 7 titles without a scrap of competition for poetothy.
Posted before.
I'm certain that this: surprising, confusing, rapidly and covertly introduced system was brought in when we were at our weakest. For good reason. We were quick to identify it's flaws years ago, but were powerless to reveal the evil intentions of this horrendously managed system and it has been proven beyond all doubt that it was introduced to benefit one club only.
That's down to how it's managed.
Now that the spotlight is firmly on the obvious and overt bias towards Separate Entity FC and the entire country is waking up to exactly what the intentions of the .... yes the third Catholic celtc supporter that was given the Compliance officer post.... the banner of consistency is what we are all supposedly pursuing ....
shite I say!
What we are looking for is cleansing the sectarian machinery/management of the biased processes they employ and that have been installed. Why - because the facts are stacking up and they are likely to continue for the remainder of this season - it's proving beyond a reasonable doubt that the system has benefited only one team.
Next season I fully expect the Compliant Officer to have her duties expanded - points docked for nasty songs with IRA ditties ignored - maybe they should switch their attention to the behaviour of supporters. These NINE bastards got off Scot Free: It justifies why my prediction is .... look out for the continuing clamour to have the whole discredited system revised for next season. Why? To reset the odious factual data that damns the current processes - and the flawed system to be discredited completely.
Previous data will then be ignored and we'll start afresh from 2019/18 with a 'new and improved' system. Delicately altered to ensure the bias continues and is less obvious.
If they can cover the tracks of the largest 'Abuse Scandal' in World Sport by destroying the evidence, then there's no reason to think they will fail in such a trifling issue as this - only the integrity of the game - after 40 years practice they've become very proficient at 'protecting the evil papish entity'!
I think its quite clear that club 1872 are speaking on the boards behalf .
Very good questions and actually not the ones I would have asked. They're very professional at getting to the heart of the matter.
My questions would have centred around individual incidents rather than the background to all of them. Kudos C1872. You're doing a sterling job.
It is quite amusing how folk think the club can ask the same questions in the same manner. Few will know if this is directed by the club or not but I would wager a significant amount of cash that Rangers had at least some input into what was said and by whom.
How the clubs statement should have went....
Exactly!It is quite amusing how folk think the club can ask the same questions in the same manner. Few will know if this is directed by the club or not but I would wager a significant amount of cash that Rangers had at least some input into what was said and by whom.
The board are spineless mate but your point is 100% accurate.
The SFA will do sweet f.uck all, our Board should be demanding answers.I think its quite clear that club 1872 are speaking on the boards behalf .
Good statement but will no doubt be ignored by the shysters supposedly running the game as usual .
It is quite amusing how folk think the club can ask the same questions in the same manner. Few will know if this is directed by the club or not but I would wager a significant amount of cash that Rangers had at least some input into what was said and by whom.
But McGinns grandad was chairman of the Tims when bjkPower and McGinn don't play for the mentally challengeds.
This ... arse paper in sfa toilet tomorrowThe SFA will do sweet f.uck all, our Board should be demanding answers.
It is quite amusing how folk think the club can ask the same questions in the same manner. Few will know if this is directed by the club or not but I would wager a significant amount of cash that Rangers had at least some input into what was said and by whom.