broxi_bear83
Well-Known Member
Looks like just a couple of Greggs sausage rolls awayWould have been cheaper to get him taken out for good.
Looks like just a couple of Greggs sausage rolls awayWould have been cheaper to get him taken out for good.
Since king signed a new deal with them i think the opportunity of us to do that has been and gone.Sue his placemen for not acting in the best interests of, their employer, Rangers.
Demonstrate their clear links to Ashley and motion to have the contracts ripped up.
Quite plausible although very risky as the costs will probably already be into millions for this which when all said and done we might have to pay, which seems a terrible plan for spite. Either way the club need this to endFeel like people haven’t really clicked that we’re the ones being obstructionist here. We’ll just continue to draw this out and take the piss while we can. Makes a change from it being the other way about for so long.
The contract that is under dispute wasn’t signed by the Fat C*nts placemen though.
How is it possible that the contracts signed by his snivelling weasels on the Rangers board stand up to scrutiny?
They were clearly only in Sports Direct's favour. Ridiculous.
Mr king and his counsel signed these dealsMr King and his counsel may have already thought of this.
I believe the contract being contested was signed by the current board. However they were painted into a corner as they really had to get out of the original one, and pay a lot of money to do it.
I believe the contract being contested was signed by the current board. However they were painted into a corner as they really had to get out of the original one, and pay a lot of money to do it.
I wouldn’t dispute that at all mate, that is clearly the situation the current Board found themselves in. Just clearing up the misconception that many still have that the deal was signed by Lambias et al.
It’s a f*cking mess and I agree with an earlier poster that we are currently playing for time.
I'm not really sure why anyone would still think that, it's been discussed here many times. It's even been reported in the tabloids.
https://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/sport...ws/rangers-losses-double-after-Ibrox-11463684
Ibrox accounts released tonight show chairman Dave King and his board forked out £3 million to free themselves from their onerous deal with Mike Ashley five years early.
Rangers could sever all ties with the controversial sports retailer at the end of the season, but they’ve had to take a short term hit for long term gain.
Rangers are expected to negotiate a new and more lucrative retail deal next summer that will earn them substantially more than the seven pence in a pound they were handed under the contract set up by the previous discredited board.
Just have to look through the thread mate to see some are still ‘confused’. Unlike me, not everyone is on here all day every day ha ha.
Ours don't.His lawyers certainly know the way to word contracts in the fat parasite prick's favour,probably the best leech corporate lawyers that money can buy.
Overly simplifying matters here, granted, but can’t we get a 1y contract with conditions so overwhelmingly in our favour, the fat slug would want to walk away?
If he did, sign another one with the same outfit to counterbalance the previous deal?
AFAIK, the new deal favours fatso forever. Only liquidation can cancel it.Overly simplifying matters here, granted, but can’t we get a 1y contract with conditions so overwhelmingly in our favour, the fat slug would want to walk away?
If he did, sign another one with the same outfit to counterbalance the previous deal?
Who do you think would make such an arrangement.
I have no idea.
Who would like the PR stance from the supporter’s perspective of being the company that had a direct hand in freeing us from Ashley?
I would bloody well hope so mate but saying that our legal team would appear to be completely useless, how the fat parasite engineered the contracts in the first place would be the way to unravel this.This! I thought a director (Lambias (?) and the other big galloot ) had to by law make any decisions in the best interests of the company and its shareholders (me).
Has this ever been questioned?
There's the problem, people keep coming up with this idea, however no-one knows who would actually be willing to do it. I suspect that is because the answer is no-one.
Before anyone says, but they would get a tremendous deal the following year, that would just make it obvious what had happened and why they had done it.
It's not like ashley is famous for suing people who get in his way.
Can we sue the spivs in charge of the club who signed this ridiculous contract with Sports Direct to pay for every time we get ruled against?
Contract states he has the option to match.
If he refused and walked away, is there still a contract to fight over?
You will forgive my legal illiteracy, personally, I blame my school.
No dodgy northern irish fans with ‘connections’ that can give him a call and just tell him hands off or else?
If he refused and walked away then as I understand it that's it finished.
However I have to ask again who would make an arrangement "... with conditions so overwhelmingly in our favour ..."
“Overwhelming” is a relative term.
What we would consider a fairly balanced deal would be looked upon by the Fat Man as amateurish and bad business.
This club, this fan base, is an untapped license to print money with regards to merchandise, and with Gerrard at the helm, has a global reach probably greater than at any time in its history.
You ask for a company name.
I can offer none.
I can only say what I believe, that the opportunity that exists right now is incredible to potential suitors.
You know I actually thought that might happen.No dodgy northern irish fans with ‘connections’ that can give him a call and just tell him hands off or else?
The opportunity is fabulous, no doubt, but only when ashley is out of the picture.
Please bear in mind I was only responding to what you actually posted.
"Overly simplifying matters here, granted, but can’t we get a 1y contract with conditions so overwhelmingly in our favour, the fat slug would want to walk away? "
Again, until someone comes up with a company actually willing to do it then it is pretty much a non-starter.
We are not northern Irish fans we are Ulster menNo dodgy northern irish fans with ‘connections’ that can give him a call and just tell him hands off or else?
Sorry mate-no offence!We are not northern Irish fans we are Ulster men
Can we sue the spivs in charge of the club who signed this ridiculous contract with Sports Direct to pay for every time we get ruled against?
None taken we are the peopleSorry mate-no offence!
Aye right Timmy.AFAIK, the new deal favours fatso forever. Only liquidation can cancel it.
Sue his placemen for not acting in the best interests of, their employer, Rangers.
Demonstrate their clear links to Ashley and motion to have the contracts ripped up.
You know I actually thought that might happen.
it never happened with Whyte so its never happeningYou know I actually thought that might happen.
Sports Direct shop windows and bricks, that would be a marvellous combination.
Ashley won’t compromise, won’t give an inch.The time money and effort wasted on this (unt is unbelievable. King has to sit down across a table and try and thrash this out. If the outcome is a bit of lost face for King so be it. The greater good here is rangers
How is it possible that the contracts signed by his snivelling weasels on the Rangers board stand up to scrutiny?
They were clearly only in Sports Direct's favour. Ridiculous.
I know this won't be popular with 99%of the fans but I would just arrange a one off payout and get rid of him. We'll lose out at first but be better off in the future