They are 2 different things.Officials need to man up and enforce the 'clear and obvious error' law. That handball in the Man City game was far from a clear and obvious error by the ref.
They are 2 different things.
If handball is detected by the attacking team whether deliberate or not, the goal won’t count, “clear and obvious” doesn’t come into it
Never mind the hand ball Aquero (using VAR) was offside for the second goal,i'm surprised nobody called for it to ne replayed.Officials need to man up and enforce the 'clear and obvious error' law. That handball in the Man City game was far from a clear and obvious error by the ref.
Football has always been this way.Also how can any rule be taken seriously when the SAME handball incident is only a foul if you're attacking and not defending. Ludicrous.
Try and see the 'goal' denied RB Leipzig yesterday...brushed soooo lightly off a hand, invisible in real time, and the hand was not raised or an 'unusual shape' yet VAR rule out the goal.
It has been a disaster and isn't even needed.
I'll contribute what I contribute to every VAR thread.
F.uck VAR.
Also how can any rule be taken seriously when the SAME handball incident is only a foul if you're attacking and not defending. Ludicrous.
Try and see the 'goal' denied RB Leipzig yesterday...brushed soooo lightly off a hand, invisible in real time, and the hand was not raised or an 'unusual shape' yet VAR rule out the goal.
It has been a disaster and isn't even needed.
Problem being the new laws regarding handball mean that ANY contact, deliberate or otherwise, that results in a goal is then penalised.Officials need to man up and enforce the 'clear and obvious error' law. That handball in the Man City game was far from a clear and obvious error by the ref.
Flawed logic I’m afraid.Also how can any rule be taken seriously when the SAME handball incident is only a foul if you're attacking and not defending. Ludicrous.
Try and see the 'goal' denied RB Leipzig yesterday...brushed soooo lightly off a hand, invisible in real time, and the hand was not raised or an 'unusual shape' yet VAR rule out the goal.
It has been a disaster and isn't even needed.
Flawed logic I’m afraid.
If a defender commits the same foul on an attacker in the box, that an attacker commits on a defender, the first results in a penalty, whereas the second would only be a free kick. The rules are clear.
Why do we only ever seem to hear a rumpus when it’s Man City and not other clubs. Despite being given every advantage going and breaking every rule in the book, they still bitch like Celtc when they don’t get their way.
Man City drew the game because they had thirty efforts and only scored two goals, the same as spurs, who had about three.
I didn’t hear Guardiola whingeing when Anthony Taylor failed to send off Vincent Kompany against Liverpool last season. No, the officials were fine then.
I haven’t noticed such a consistent media furore about any other incidents and all of a sudden there is a hullabaloo because it’s Man City and Guardiola bumps his gums about it.S
In the instance you quote both incidents are fouls. Under the new handball rule one handball is a foul the other is not. Your point is not illogical it makes no sense. Your point about Man City is drivel as there have been many VAR controversies since it was introduced.
I haven’t noticed such a consistent media furore about any other incidents and all of a sudden there is a hullabaloo because it’s Man City and Guardiola bumps his gums about it.
Officials need to man up and enforce the 'clear and obvious error' law. That handball in the Man City game was far from a clear and obvious error by the ref.