Jimmy Jazz
Well-Known Member
Cameron is a slabbering, condescening fucktard.
Slightest bit of pressure on lennon and it's happening again.It never changes from the squealing Timpanzees, the same old public intimidation and harassment of refs and officials via the media to win them titles and trophies. To be fair to Boyd, when Reid did the same thing at an AGM nobody said anything, then when Lennon deliberately engineered a ref strike to break both the officials and the SFA itself, again, nobody said anything.
Is he the one who accused the filths victims of money grabbing?Cameron is a slabbering, condescening fucktard.
Slightest bit of pressure on lennon and it's happening again.
The merest hint of Rangers opening a gap and we're back to referees taking industrial action.
The SFA will probably fine them for Boyd's comments. It'll give them the fuel for their paranoia campaign to really kick.
And it never will be until the filth are reined in.The SFA refused to back their refs against the almost weekly harassment by Lennon, which led to an unprecedented ref strike in Scottish football. The game has never been the same since.
And it never will be until the filth are reined in.
The point they’re both missing - Boyd is An Official Celtic Ambassador, not some random ex-pro with a mic. When he speaks, he speaks for Celtic Football Club. If they back his statements then they are, in effect, accusing Scottish football of being corrupt. If this isn’t bringing the game into disrepute, then what is?
The point they’re both missing - Boyd is An Official Celtic Ambassador, not some random ex-pro with a mic. When he speaks, he speaks for Celtic Football Club. If they back his statements then they are, in effect, accusing Scottish football of being corrupt. If this isn’t bringing the game into disrepute, then what is?
Beaton should insist on a retraction and a public apology from Boyd
Boyd has put Beaton at risk with his accusations and it wasn’t only one flippant comment. There were several made that Beaton was biased against the mentally challengeds
SFA will need to back the refs or we will have even more chaos if they strike again
Maybe we will have enough savvy to blame them this time unlike the last referee strike that was never pinned on Nonce F.C.
He describes cuhnty’s comments as extremely silly, borderline and maybe the SFA are morally due to reprimand cuhnty. Of course Greechan is putting a slant on it making out it’s a nothing comment. He is sticking up for the cuhnt. But that’s my opinion.Have you read the article? If you have then there is no conceivable way you can say Greechan sticks up for Boyd. He describes his comments as " beyond the pale". Greechan's article is about the problems and complexity of citing presenters on club tv. How does the Compliance Officer become aware of what's said? It would be unworkable.
Is he the one who accused the filths victims of money grabbing?
H
H e describes cuhnty’s comments as extremely silly, borderline and maybe the SFA are morally due to reprimand cuhnty. Of course Greechan is putting a slant on it making out it’s a nothing comment. He is sticking up for the cuhnt. But that’s my opinion.
I don’t normally read articles by fuckwits for fuckwits but I did as it was pointed out to me. Oh and I would never pay for the privilege of reading shite written by fuckwits.
How is it unworkable? That boot of a compliance officer and previous ones use recordings of games to pursue Rangers staff. So what if it’s on club TV. If she is shown a recording then she is duty bound to deal with it. Club TV presenters and guest commentators should act appropriately or deal with the consequences.
AwkwardHow times change for Neil the town clock Cameron
From Saturday:
Neil Cameron
@NeilCameron5
·
Aug 17
If Tom Boyd said on Celtic TV what I'm reading then it's a disgrace.
Now he wants us all to forget about it?
Any footage of this incident? If it was a stonewaller im sure the footage would be everywhere
This was fully explained by Bill Young on Talking Football, on Monday, to both Hugh Burns and Gerry McCabe. Gerry McCabe seemed to have great difficulty grasping the concept - or perhaps their truth is more palatable.The point they’re both missing - Boyd is An Official Celtic Ambassador, not some random ex-pro with a mic. When he speaks, he speaks for Celtic Football Club. If they back his statements then they are, in effect, accusing Scottish football of being corrupt. If this isn’t bringing the game into disrepute, then what is?
i'm afraid that's 3 mate.2 Trebles and there is a conspiracy What do they want ? They are up there with the nationalists who are just bat crazy .
I've yet to see it but I did see the Dunfermline incident where their player took a kick to the face in the scums penalty box. No mention of this on MSM.
Is he the one who accused the filths victims of money grabbing?
You actually have to ask?John Beaton has received death threats earlier this year.
The SFA need to hammer Boyd.
It's no joke doing this to a guy who has already had his life threatened.
Do that lot actually want to see a man murdered?
With the Lurgan Bigot back in the hot seat , they are just getting warmed up.They are getting away with murder. Absolute disgrace. Playing a clever game and I'm afraid, winning the PR battle more often than not.
"Light abuse" was his phrase.
An article in the Hherald hit all the right notes for the abuse apologists, and for those starting up the "they're only in it for the money" routine.
"John (not his real name) was going to talk to me about his time at the Boys Club. He suffered what he called “light abuse”. He knew what some of his team-mates were going through.
John has since changed his mind. He’d rather get on with his life now both Cairney and Torbett are behind bars. He is not looking to exploit the situation for financial gain. Indeed, he has been a season ticket holder at Celtic for decades.
John also doesn’t blame the current board or anyone working at the club. Nor does he expect an apology from the club. All he wants is some form of closure."
We could look at this another way: if nothing is done it will give Rangers TV free rein to voice similar opinions whenever necessary.
Let them reap what they sow.
There is an element of truth in that.Fair comment only problem is the whole we cannae behave like that lot attitude.
Is why the top refs target us... quite funny that they are pissed off about a match with the pars though they must be worried about Rangers and the rest of the season.
can you get a screengrab of this to use against him?How times change for Neil the town clock Cameron
From Saturday:
Neil Cameron
@NeilCameron5
·
Aug 17
If Tom Boyd said on Celtic TV what I'm reading then it's a disgrace.
Now he wants us all to forget about it?
There is and has been for some timeNeil Cameron really is an absolute imbecile, isn't he?
First he trots out the old "Rangers = new club" line which has been disproved by UEFA, the SFA and anyone else with even a passing interest in Scottish Football who is not rabidly pro-Celtic.
Then he mentions, almost in passing, the threats made to referees including Beaton. Who is responsible for that? celtic, and their odious support. Look at the OF match last December, the media outcry at certain decisions which for once were not given to celtic and the reaction of their fanbase as a result. The media trigger the hate and the entitled mob-rule mentality of the celtic support does the rest.
Unless of course, they were all the actions of that single fan "Juan Guy". We've all heard that one before.
It is no coincidence that the referees strike was triggered by decisions going against celtic, that referees have been forced to publicly apologise for getting decisions wrong (but only when they go against celtic) and that referees are threatened and abused if they so much as give a free kick against them. Hugh Dallas struck by coins, referees strike, Beaton threatened. All from the followers of one club and one club only and goaded on by a moronic media.
There is an obvious and direct link between the outcry from the media when things go against celtic and the over-the-top actions of their support. That's why Boyd's comments matter, even if he is a moron. It is also different from the usual braindead bitter vitriol from the likes of Fatson and the goat-blower because they are not employed by a club. Boyd was speaking on celtic tv and as such was representing the club.
Unless of course, celtic tv is a separate entity. We've all heard that one before.
The club have not distanced themselves from his views so one must conclude that they are in line with official celtic fc thinking (or at least what passes for thinking in that moral vacuum). In this sense, Boyd is no different from TLB when he accuses an official of bias or cheating. He's a representative of the club and a such must be bound by the same rules which are in place, like them or not, for everyone else.
Unless of course, there's one rule for celtic and another for everyone else. We've all seen that one before.
They probably agree with what he said.^^^^
This all day long. Why is it difficult for some in the media to grasp this?
Precisely and this is why he deserves to be hammered. We didn’t start this war, being offended at everything, they did.If Hugh Burns (for example) said similar on Rangers TV he would get crucified for it
No chance it was probably the scum board who told him to say itCeltic should tell Boyd to can it or they should take him off the air/cease his role as an ambassador.
They often sing of innocents getting murdered, in fact they glorify in it. They'd write songs about it. Boyd would be a legend.John Beaton has received death threats earlier this year.
The SFA need to hammer Boyd.
It's no joke doing this to a guy who has already had his life threatened.
Do that lot actually want to see a man murdered?
The point they’re both missing - Boyd is An Official Celtic Ambassador, not some random ex-pro with a mic. When he speaks, he speaks for Celtic Football Club. If they back his statements then they are, in effect, accusing Scottish football of being corrupt. If this isn’t bringing the game into disrepute, then what is?
This is proof he has been got at via his pay masters. no doubt.How times change for Neil the town clock Cameron
From Saturday:
Neil Cameron
@NeilCameron5
·
Aug 17
If Tom Boyd said on Celtic TV what I'm reading then it's a disgrace.
Now he wants us all to forget about it?
The point they’re both missing - Boyd is An Official Celtic Ambassador, not some random ex-pro with a mic. When he speaks, he speaks for Celtic Football Club. If they back his statements then they are, in effect, accusing Scottish football of being corrupt. If this isn’t bringing the game into disrepute, then what is?
Any chance of getting Hugh Burns to try this out, just as a part of research of course, test the theory sort ofIf Hugh Burns (for example) said similar on Rangers TV he would get crucified for it
The mhedia don't seem to grasp this
Have you read the article? If you have then there is no conceivable way you can say Greechan sticks up for Boyd. He describes his comments as " beyond the pale". Greechan's article is about the problems and complexity of citing presenters on club tv. How does the Compliance Officer become aware of what's said? It would be unworkable.
Another season another period of having to deal with the orcs and their minions.
When we win the league again they will be on suicide watch but don't expect fair play and parity toward our club .
We are on our own .
On Beaton , he has been a marked man since the 1-0 game at Ibrox.
What happens in Scotland wouldn't be allowed to happen anywhere else, in England it would be rounded on by all and sundry.
The media in general ,in any decent country ,would call it out for the viscous bias it is , endangering an official and being allowed to do so is the stuff of banana republics.
Frankly ,the Scottish media should be fucking embarrassed.