I was just going to post that. You have stolen my dreams you monster.
The link should have been sent to people on the mailing list and not just put on open social media for mentally challengeds to fill in and ruin
Started filling it in and got errors - stupid errors as far as I can see.
For example, it asks at what price you would consider the membership a bargain. Let's say I put £100.
Next question asks at what price would you rule it out as too expensive. If you put, for example, £150 it subsequently throws up an error saying £150 is more than £100. Of course it is FFS.
Am I wrong or have the f*cked it?
took fkn ages
Got the exact same issue. I think the survey is structured with £100 as the maximum fee. I don't think the club think people will pay over that per year.
The link should have been sent to people on the mailing list and not just put on open social media for mentally challengeds to fill in and ruin
Started filling it in and got errors - stupid errors as far as I can see.
For example, it asks at what price you would consider the membership a bargain. Let's say I put £100.
Next question asks at what price would you rule it out as too expensive. If you put, for example, £150 it subsequently throws up an error saying £150 is more than £100. Of course it is FFS.
Am I wrong or have the f*cked it?
Regarding the membership scheme, it's not clear as to whether it's per month or annual monies we are talking about here. Should really be clarified.
I took the membership question to mean yearly.
People need to keep their answers to these questions reasonable. We have a lot on here in particular that like to spout about how much they would pay and everything to Rangers etc. No point putting down £100 for membership when the vast majority wouldn’t pay anywhere near this.
I personally think £40 for a yearly membership with the benefits they listed would see a good number of people taking it up. Maybe even less cost would see a better return.
Glad they have the survey but I probably wouldn’t have known about it if it wasn’t posted on here.
Just a repeat of questions. I got it to. Just reentered my answers and it moved onStarted filling it in and got errors - stupid errors as far as I can see.
For example, it asks at what price you would consider the membership a bargain. Let's say I put £100.
Next question asks at what price would you rule it out as too expensive. If you put, for example, £150 it subsequently throws up an error saying £150 is more than £100. Of course it is FFS.
Am I wrong or have the f*cked it?
£100? On top of your season ticket and CCCS?Started filling it in and got errors - stupid errors as far as I can see.
For example, it asks at what price you would consider the membership a bargain. Let's say I put £100.
Next question asks at what price would you rule it out as too expensive. If you put, for example, £150 it subsequently throws up an error saying £150 is more than £100. Of course it is FFS.
Am I wrong or have the f*cked it?
£100? On top of your season ticket and CCCS?
I was only having a laugh, wouldn’t the membership scheme would be for season ticket holders in the first place on the CCCS, in order to reduce the number of people trying to get to away games? You can only join the CCCS with a season ticket can’t you?Jeezo mate, I thought I’d made it clear it was only an example. I’m sure most would have taken it as exactly that.
And, of course, the vast majority of we Rangers fans do not have season tickets and are on CCCS. I’d be delighted to live close enough to Ibrox to reclaim my season ticket but, right now, I’m limited to a handful of home games per season.
Am the same, stating error.I can't even get past the enter your email stage without it repeatedly saying Error. @Greg Marshall Help?
I was only having a laugh, wouldn’t the membership scheme would be for season ticket holders in the first place on the CCCS, in order to reduce the number of people trying to get to away games? You can only join the CCCS with a season ticket can’t you?
They're in for a surprise there I recon.Got the exact same issue. I think the survey is structured with £100 as the maximum fee. I don't think the club think people will pay over that per year.
OK - in the two sets of questions regarding a membership scheme it looks like you need to keep your figures below £100.
Its on the official website. You did answer that question by saying you visit the official website every day. Didn’t you?
I got that but the values it was comparing was too expensive (question 44) and expensive but you might still do it (q46). Switched them around and still got it. Bad coding.Started filling it in and got errors - stupid errors as far as I can see.
For example, it asks at what price you would consider the membership a bargain. Let's say I put £100.
Next question asks at what price would you rule it out as too expensive. If you put, for example, £150 it subsequently throws up an error saying £150 is more than £100. Of course it is FFS.
Am I wrong or have they f*cked it?
I got that. Switched them around and still got it. Bad coding.
I cancelled out. Could not get round it.Seemed to work for me if I kept all figures under £100.
Over £100 for a “club membership” will never take-off imo.
£50 per annum with a free first team squad photo, key ring and access to priority ticketing etc is more realistic.
The link should have been sent to people on the mailing list and not just put on open social media for mentally challengeds to fill in and ruin
Naw they are asking for a price for different content Mate.Started filling it in and got errors - stupid errors as far as I can see.
For example, it asks at what price you would consider the membership a bargain. Let's say I put £100.
Next question asks at what price would you rule it out as too expensive. If you put, for example, £150 it subsequently throws up an error saying £150 is more than £100. Of course it is FFS.
Am I wrong or have they f*cked it?
I don’t think there is any suggestion of £100 membership, in fact some of us found we couldn’t put a figure greater than £100.
If you feel the prices you’ve quoted are appropriate then that’s what to put in when/if you do the survey. You’re response suggests you haven’t looked at it yet.
Why does my response suggest that I’ve not looked at the survey?
And why would anyone be looking at trying to put a figure greater than £100 if that’s not what they were intending their answer to be? It’s like a tim response just trying to hike prices up and sabotage that survey.
PS
I had already completed the survey before my original post. Until I read some posts on here, I never knew there was a £100 cap as I wasn’t even entertaining that figure as an option when answering the survey.
‘Over £100 for a membership will never take off’ was what you said. There is nothing in the survey that suggests a price at that level. I assumed, wrongly it would seem, that by saying that you thought a figure of £100 was suggested in the survey.
I think I was the first person on the thread to mention a figure of £100 and, as I explained later, it was simply a random figure to highlight that the first question asked what figure you thought was reasonable and the second question, which asked what was excessive, wouldn’t let you put a higher figure if that figure was over £100. In a nutshell I think that part of the survey is badly constructed.
PS - Depending on what’s on offer, I don‘t think a membership scheme at under £9 a month (under £100 a year) is a ‘tim response just trying to hike prices up and sabotage the survey’ if I’m honest. It’s perfectly reasonable as an upper limit if they offer the right things, for example including the RangersTV package.
I pay £17.25 a month for the RTV package. If that was included as a membership benefit, I’d have zero qualms about paying upwards of £100 for it.‘Over £100 for a membership will never take off’ was what you said. There is nothing in the survey that suggests a price at that level. I assumed, wrongly it would seem, that by saying that you thought a figure of £100 was suggested in the survey.
I think I was the first person on the thread to mention a figure of £100 and, as I explained later, it was simply a random figure to highlight that the first question asked what figure you thought was reasonable and the second question, which asked what was excessive, wouldn’t let you put a higher figure if that figure was over £100. In a nutshell I think that part of the survey is badly constructed.
PS - Depending on what’s on offer, I don‘t think a membership scheme at under £9 a month (under £100 a year) is a ‘tim response just trying to hike prices up and sabotage the survey’ if I’m honest. It’s perfectly reasonable as an upper limit if they offer the right things, for example including the RangersTV package.