Sheik Ma Shammy
Well-Known Member
Hugh making an arse of it on players trading at Rangers.
Morelos "nowhere near his previous value!"Hugh making an arse of it on players trading at Rangers.
Agreed and slightly off topic but that tackle from Lundstram is exactly what we have been lacking for a while.Compliance officer job done for him in seconds. Red card stands and no case to answer for Lundstram.
Iv been saying this from the start and I’ve been shot Down on here by a few.This Gordons a sneaky wee rat who hides his celtic leanings behind the need to create discussion.
Don’t think anyone did m8.I can’t honestly remember lundstram tackle , god I was ruff yesterday but I never thought I was that bad
He's escaped his carer again.
He isn’t though. The year he was top scorer in europa league and scoring 30 in a single season he was a genuine £25m player.Morelos "nowhere near his previous value!"
Wishful thinking ya pish stained auld wank!
That's because it was a great tackle that won the ball cleanly and also allowed him to collect and come away with it. There may be an argument that he was off his feet and could be considered a foul but IMO its an extremely spurious one.I can’t honestly remember lundstram tackle , god I was ruff yesterday but I never thought I was that bad
You do realise he's being utilised in a different role don't you?He isn’t though. The year he was top scorer in europa league and scoring 30 in a single season he was a genuine £25m player.
Trial by media. It stinks to high heaven. This place is a backwater that is only getting worse.Aye this Lundstram tackle on Doig being discussed asking if it will be reviewed by the CO
Phucking pricks
And how, mate.They get their talking points from kerryfail st and the fiddleboard.
Rae has completely lost the plot.
I do yes and that is making his transfer value decrease.You do realise he's being utilised in a different role don't you?
Lost the plot..... no, he's a greedy wee bastard who's slowly morphed into another Derick Ferguson. He puts mick coin above any allegiance he once had with Rangers in order to stay in a job. Not even sure if he's aware of it anymore but he's increasingly cringe worthy.Rae has completely lost the plot.
Was that from a caller, if so, I hope they cut him off?VAR is getting spoken about tonight and talking about that clowns tackle v Lundsrums tackle.
Rockets.
I must admit I worried about him but he seems to be picking up some form now.Agreed and slightly off topic but that tackle from Lundstram is exactly what we have been lacking for a while.
Only Jack and Arfield that love a tackle and they haven't been available.
I’m laughing at Hugh saying he’s not interested is his previous tackles.Was that from a caller, if so, I hope they cut him off?
After all, RC keep telling us that they aren't fans of whataboutery
Reasoned well thought out discussion of Rangers form over the last year. It'll never catch on!Rangers fan Mark there was excellent.
listened to him when i was in the car coming back from the game,was thinking to myself,someone needs to talk him off the ledge lolHeard Bobby when I was driving home from the game last night. He sums up what the majority of celtic things think.
He did lunge but that doesn’t make it a dangerous tackle. He was well in front of the player and the ball. His studs were down and his leading foot low and he took the ball.But he did say he "lunged" WTF?
And celebrate their first win away from home as they’d won the league.You would think that the yahoos would be phoning up asking questions about why a club that's spent £25 million in the summer and £15 million the summer before that are behind Dundee Utd and Motherwell in the league but apparently not?
Or the various assaults on Hagi this season...baffltodd how nobody in the media questioned any of the tackles on bassey last week.
And what a fabulous tackle it was too. A strong challenge, but he came out with the ball. Good play from Lundstram I say.Its now Lundstram tackle, watch for it being cited now.
Good job Beat the Pundit went to a Rangers man
It was very early on. To be honest, I am surprised he didn't get a yellow for it.I can’t honestly remember lundstram tackle , god I was ruff yesterday but I never thought I was that bad
He won the ball and it was side on stopping the player running up the wing it was not reckless or dangerous.It was very early on. To be honest, I am surprised he didn't get a yellow for it.
Could be debated either way. He was off the ground with both feet so technically "out of control".He won the ball and it was side on stopping the player running up the wing it was not reckless or dangerous.
Laughable.Could be debated either way. He was off the ground with both feet so technically "out of control".
What is laughable?Laughable.
Can I have a shot of your green-tinted ones?What is laughable?
Take off the blue specs mate... have a look at the clips of his tackle.
Ha. What a prat.Can I have a shot of your green-tinted ones?
It was a hard challenge but if you look at the tackle no way was both his feet of the ground, and more importantly his studs were pointed downCould be debated either way. He was off the ground with both feet so technically "out of control".
Strange posts from you.Could be debated either way. He was off the ground with both feet so technically "out of control".
You mentioned the glasses you are either easily led or wearing green-tinted specs.Ha. What a prat.
So because I said that I was surprised that he didn't get a yellow, that makes me a tim?
Grow up and open yourself up to reasoned debate.
To me it looks like they are - check the clip in the John Lundstram Tackle thread. pause at 3 seconds.It was a hard challenge but if you look at the tackle no way was both his feet of the ground, and more importantly his studs were pointed down
How is that strange?Strange posts from you.
The clips clearly show him with one foot extended, studs down and winning the ball cleanly. The fact he made the tackle, got immediately to his feet and kept the ball prove he was not out of control.What is laughable?
Take off the blue specs mate... have a look at the clips of his tackle.
I am not comparing the two at all.The clips clearly show him with one foot extended, studs down and winning the ball cleanly. The fact he made the tackle, got immediately to his feet and kept the ball prove he was not out of control.
You can say none of those things about Porteus’ tackle.
Is there a different angle to the clip in the tackle thread?The clips clearly show him with one foot extended, studs down and winning the ball cleanly. The fact he made the tackle, got immediately to his feet and kept the ball prove he was not out of control.
You can say none of those things about Porteus’ tackle.