Not just the subs but the tactics employed after them. Sat off them, inviting them to attack, when they hadn't really been in the game.Subs were baffling.
I agree I was expecting Morelos off for roofe, who played well when he came on btw!Morelos was having a shocker and should have been subbed. He takes off Aribo and Hagi who were both playing well and we lose control of the game.
It should have been Roofe and Sakala for Wright and Morelos. Clear as day
Agree with this, SG misjudged it imo. Think he might have expected Alfie to take one after missing so many chances.Morelos was having a shocker and should have been subbed. He takes off Aribo and Hagi who were both playing well and we lose control of the game.
It should have been Roofe and Sakala for Wright and Morelos. Clear as day
I agree with that.Didnt look like a game for bacuna today for me
I think it's still premature to make opinions like that on Bacuna. It's like a different sport up here compared to what he's been used to.Bacuna looks to me like he believes he'll stroll it up here.
Many have thought the same and vanished.
Tav looked like he'd played during the international break.
You can see he is a talented player with a good touch and eye for a pass but he is definitely looks a luxury player and that wasn’t the game or time to bring him onBacuna looks to me like he believes he'll stroll it up here.
Many have thought the same and vanished.
Tav looked like he'd played during the international break.
I must admit that I don't know how anyone watching that game, seeing what chances we were missing up front, and what pace was doing to them -- I cannot see how two such obvious and simple subs weren't made.Morelos was having a shocker and should have been subbed. He takes off Aribo and Hagi who were both playing well and we lose control of the game.
It should have been Roofe and Sakala for Wright and Morelos. Clear as day
I don't think its unreasonable on what we've seen from him, and previous imports from England, to suggest he hasnt got it yet.I think it's still premature to make opinions like that on Bacuna. It's like a different sport up here compared to what he's been used to.
Is the right answerMorelos should have been off and aribo should have stayed on
Totally agree 100%.Morelos was having a shocker and should have been subbed. He takes off Aribo and Hagi who were both playing well and we lose control of the game.
It should have been Roofe and Sakala for Wright and Morelos. Clear as day
Bringing on Bacuna because he has looked good in training rather than deciding based on what the game neededI can live with bad subs if they make sense. A player can struggle, a direct replacement be brought on and they also have a bad game, it happens.
But the subs today made zero sense. Aribo and Hagi were doing just fine, they didn't need to be replaced at all. There doesn't seem to be any thought behind it, just bringing players on for the sake of it.
Davis sub said to me , we're trying to hold on to what we have here.Always seems to be the same subs and they never seem to change anything. Hagi and Aribo were looking dangerous and he takes them off. Tav and Morelos should have been subbed. Bringing Davis on just made us sit deeper and invite Hearts on even more
Yes Patterson for me should start every game Tavernier is finished but he keeps playing him and it means we offer nothing in terms of threat from the right hand side, his allegiance to Tav will cost him his ob and maybe the league for us, I would like to see an extended run for Patterson to see how many goals we start to score as we are not scoring like a league winning side just now.Morelos for sakala & lundstram staying on the pitch wins the game. Even Patterson coming on at 65
Did you see either of the two passes he played which should have lead to two goals?Aribo off was absolutely criminal. Bacuna was embarrassing