Surely an act of religious reverence is not something that's done in an attempt to rile people? More "worrying and alarming" is the RC church's refusal to differentiate between genuine religious reverence and someone being an arsehole.
Its the same as when at P@rkhead one time going to game and a couple stopped in the middle of the street kneeled looked at us and make the sign of the cross. I'm insulted they think I will be offended, they think I'll be angry. FFS we just laughed. It's them who are bringing their own Christianity (if they are believers) into disrepute.Not sure how you could reasonably be offended by that but that’s just my opinion.
To be honest I'm not sure why you're so annoyed by it. Stupid simple man makes stupid gesture, not really a surprise or particularly offensive. In fact I'd go as far as saying it's funny as his team have just been humped.Well spotted Sherlock.
Its the same as when at P@rkhead one time going to game and a couple stopped in the middle of the street kneeled looked at us and make the sign of the cross. I'm insulted they think I will be offended, they think I'll be angry. FFS we just laughed. It's them who are bringing their own Christianity (if they are believers) into disrepute.
This.We had one on here last night admitting he booed GSTK.I'd stand with the NI and England fans before I stood with any of these arseholes.
Really ?? Who the %^*& booed GSTK ??! %^*& sake. I know there is a wee group of Nats on here, so I assume one of them ?? Embarrassing.This.We had one on here last night admitting he booed GSTK.
It's in the "well done NI thread" there's actually a couple getting it tight,don't want to risk another holiday by naming direct.Really ?? Who the %^*& booed GSTK ??! %^*& sake. I know there is a wee group of Nats on here, so I assume one of them ?? Embarrassing.
Did I say what you said was wrong ?Did I say he was wrong?
It's an ignorant clown doing it looking for a reaction of that there's no doubt.
He didn't get one.
Point I'm making is, it's no just Kaffliks who can do it or have an exclusivity with it.
Jocko or O'Jock has no idea.
Did I say what you said was wrong ?
Nobody is questioning the act of blessing yourself, Catholic or non catholic. Others have said it doesn’t or wouldn’t bother them getting it done to their face, that’s their prerogative. In the context of doing it at a football match while facing a group of people that he doesn’t know, there was obviously an inflammatory aspect to it.
I remember going over to Parkhead for the Duncan Ferguson debut game on the Clarkston bus and some Celtic fan in a works van took out his false teeth and put them on the dashboard as some kind of act of aggression… absolutely bonkersIts the same as when at P@rkhead one time going to game and a couple stopped in the middle of the street kneeled looked at us and make the sign of the cross. I'm insulted they think I will be offended, they think I'll be angry. FFS we just laughed. It's them who are bringing their own Christianity (if they are believers) into disrepute.
One poster said he booed GSTK but sings it at Ibrox.Really ?? Who the %^*& booed GSTK ??! %^*& sake. I know there is a wee group of Nats on here, so I assume one of them ?? Embarrassing.
Did it not turn out that Boruc hadn’t blessed himself in front of supporters (Celtic or opposition) up until then as well?Surely an act of religious reverence is not something that's done in an attempt to rile people? More "worrying and alarming" is the RC church's refusal to differentiate between genuine religious reverence and someone being an arsehole.
I remember recognising someone that I would see regularly in the East Enclosure singing all sorts, including One Terry Butcher/Chris Woods etc who I also saw at Hampden signing about “English bastards” at a Scotland game.One poster said he booed GSTK but sings it at Ibrox.
Used to be the Spectacles, testicles, pay book and pass back in timeAh the old my bunnet my fags my matches routine.
Very offensive to every bunnet wearing smoker out there.
The wanker signs would probably be a more assured complaint.Perversely, under humzas new hate crime legislation, he could be prosecuted for that if anyone decides they are offended by that.
Police scotlands guidance to its own officers is that offence is in the eye of the beholder. Quite mad.
Maybe he's catholic, but hasn't been to the chapel in a while, so he's not Roman.Looks to me like he doesn’t use the gesture properly it’s like he isn’t an RC just a simple little man
He is basically the wizard of oz character with straw for brains aka Peter GrantMaybe he's catholic, but hasn't been to the chapel in a while, so he's not Roman.
Just as embarrassing as the booing of our British National Anthem by Scotland fans last nightI love how the vast majority of NI fans completely ignored him. I’m a Scotland fan, but that was embarrassing.
A classic.Maybe he's catholic, but hasn't been to the chapel in a while, so he's not Roman.
dont dare mention the great man as a simile to this cretinWas that an attempt to cross himself there? Or was he throwing shapes like Ian Curtis?
He was wanting a reaction SO THAT he could call foul.You couldn’t be more wrong. He's using it to attempt a reaction. I’d say he’s a 19th Century Terrorist basted that is deliberately being a 19th Century Terrorist bastard. But would cry foul if any reaction came.
Ministers do it regularly.Luther saw no wrong with Protestants doing this. This invocation isn't exclusive to Papists.
The Sign of the Cross in the Reformation
At the time of the Reformation, things were no different. Conservative reformers such as the Church of England’s Archbishop Thomas Cranmer and, in Germany, Martin Luther did not abolish signing the cross. Still, they endeavored to appropriate its use to significant occasions such as Holy Baptism, Holy Communion, affirming the Creed, and the benediction at the end of Mass. Luther was especially concerned about retaining this meaningful act of worship, preserving nearly all of its liturgical and devotional uses. In the realm of catechesis, Luther took his lead from St. Cyril, Bishop of Jerusalem (AD 315 – 386), who, in his ancient catechism for children, remarked:
Let us not then be ashamed to confess the Crucified. Be the Cross our seal made with boldness by our fingers on our brow and in everything; over the bread we eat, and the cup we drink; in our comings in, and goings out; before our sleep, when we lie down and when we awake… It is the Sign of the faithful and the dread of evils; for He has triumphed over them in it, having made a show of them openly; for when they see the Cross, they are reminded of the Crucified; they are afraid of Him, Who hath bruised the heads of the dragon. Despise not the seal of baptism, because of the freeness of the Gift; but for this rather honor thy Benefactor. [5]
Luther thought no different. He purposed to see to it that all children of the Reformation were liberated to worship the Lord in this most meaningful and dignified expression of faith and devotion. Consequently, he encouraged the signing of the cross with the invocation in his directions for morning and evening prayer within the Small Catechism. There Luther writes:
"In the morning, when you get up, make the sign of the holy cross and say, ‘In the Name of the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit. Amen.’ … In the evening when you go to bed, make the sign of the holy cross and say…." [6]
I'm not sure either. But the combination of urgent wanking and crossing is certainly intriguing.Not sure how you could reasonably be offended by that but that’s just my opinion.
Ministers do it regularly.
Don’t they usually have to quickly move parish after these sort of things?First he does the cross and in the same movement the wanker gesture. How very Christian.
And as usual, they desperately tried to pretend there was a sectarian element to the crowd singing ‘Artur Boruc, Ulsters Number 1’ for pretty much the rest of the game.Also who could forget this piece of comedy gold from that clown in goals v Northern Ireland?
The Ulstermen certainly enjoyed it as did I !!
No, I’d suggest he’s almost definitely an RC.Looks to me like he doesn’t use the gesture properly it’s like he isn’t an RC just a simple little man
Name him.Really ?? Who the %^*& booed GSTK ??! %^*& sake. I know there is a wee group of Nats on here, so I assume one of them ?? Embarrassing.
Presbyterianism generally is not keep on annunciation and responses.Just the laity that war over perceived minor differences in interpretation.
They simply would not accept - or pretended - that people would cross themselves ostentatiously in order to rile others.Surely an act of religious reverence is not something that's done in an attempt to rile people? More "worrying and alarming" is the RC church's refusal to differentiate between genuine religious reverence and someone being an arsehole.
Presbyterianism generally is not keep on annunciation and responses.
I remember an old firm game at their dump in the early 2000s. There was a stop in play while a player was injured or something. The camera focused on the back of Barry Ferguson’s shirt, with their lot in the background screaming abuse and goading him. Front and centre were two fat brain-donors practically going purple while they made that big exaggerated cross sign, interspersed with two-fingers and wanker signs etc.At the time of the Arthur Boruc carry-on, the RC Church was at pains to say that absolutely no-one would ever make the sign of the cross to provoke or incite.
The Roman Catholic Church has criticised prosecutors for cautioning a Celtic goalkeeper who crossed himself during a match against Rangers.
Artur Boruc was cautioned for a breach of the peace over the incident at an Old Firm match at Ibrox in February.
The church called it "worrying and alarming" as the sign of the cross was a "gesture of religious reverence".
However, the Crown Office said the decision was based on the player's behaviour, rather than a single act.
Was the chap in the video was making a "gesture of religious reverence"?
I think you need to look beyond the gesture and under the skin of why he would be making the gesture and in the manner he was.To be honest I'm not sure why you're so annoyed by it. Stupid simple man makes stupid gesture, not really a surprise or particularly offensive. In fact I'd go as far as saying it's funny as his team have just been humped.
He also appears to be paying homage to Arthur Donaldson.The making of the sign of the cross with exaggerated movements and the politicised Saltire make me tend to disagree with you.
Indeed Orthodox Christians Arveladze for example perform it.Luther saw no wrong with Protestants doing this. This invocation isn't exclusive to Papists.