1) We will never know.Two questions;
1) If we had kept him and didn't sign Lammers would we have won the league?
2) Considering he's not getting a game for Parma this year would you resign for say 2m?
For me both are yes. Could have easily seen him and Dessers getting 15 goals a piece and complement each other; Dessers having better overall play but Colak being a natural finisher.
If he's not getting a game in Italy then you would imagine there would be less interest and probably cheaper than Shankland.
No and No............Two questions;
1) If we had kept him and didn't sign Lammers would we have won the league?
2) Considering he's not getting a game for Parma this year would you resign for say 2m?
For me both are yes. Could have easily seen him and Dessers getting 15 goals a piece and complement each other; Dessers having better overall play but Colak being a natural finisher.
If he's not getting a game in Italy then you would imagine there would be less interest and probably cheaper than Shankland.
I'd give Windass and Weiss a miss and use the money for Joe Garner.Kent, Colak, Morelos, Aribo, Weiss, Windass and Waghorn in the summer.
Not saying the midfield point isn't valid, but how the f**k can you say strikers aren't a problem? What Rangers team have you been watching? A goalscorer would have covered a thousand sins for this team and would have seen us crowned champions by now.Strikers aren’t the problem. It’s having a midfield who can score and assist. It’s the major difference between ourselves and the scum
Problem here is he was good enough at sticking the ball in the net, Beale was negligent. Still wouldn’t sign him back now as we need to move on but he shouldn’t have been let go when he wasSo, buy him for £2m, sell him for £1.5m because he wasn’t good enough then - buy him again for £2m?
If we have that as a budget for a striker, I would be signing Shankland
I'd have kept him but I don't think we can go for him now after him not getting a game for Parma.Two questions;
1) If we had kept him and didn't sign Lammers would we have won the league?
2) Considering he's not getting a game for Parma this year would you resign for say 2m?
For me both are yes. Could have easily seen him and Dessers getting 15 goals a piece and complement each other; Dessers having better overall play but Colak being a natural finisher.
If he's not getting a game in Italy then you would imagine there would be less interest and probably cheaper than Shankland.
Jesus ChristTwo questions;
1) If we had kept him and didn't sign Lammers would we have won the league?
2) Considering he's not getting a game for Parma this year would you resign for say 2m?
For me both are yes. Could have easily seen him and Dessers getting 15 goals a piece and complement each other; Dessers having better overall play but Colak being a natural finisher.
If he's not getting a game in Italy then you would imagine there would be less interest and probably cheaper than Shankland.
The problem with 4-4-2 is that our wing options are still awful with current injuries and our midfield will still get overrunThe system we play requires a different type of player which is so evident in our play and partly why we play long mostly the midfield is far to slow and passive to play this system with the players we have he should play 442 in the final and we would have a better chance but he won’t do it.
Strikers aren’t the problem. It’s having a midfield who can score and assist. It’s the major difference between ourselves and the scum
Not at all into the idea of signing ex players but Sakala I'd actually considerWhen is the Sakala thread going up?
Does the fact he's not getting a game for Parma tell you the answer to your first question.Two questions;
1) If we had kept him and didn't sign Lammers would we have won the league?
2) Considering he's not getting a game for Parma this year would you resign for say 2m?
For me both are yes. Could have easily seen him and Dessers getting 15 goals a piece and complement each other; Dessers having better overall play but Colak being a natural finisher.
If he's not getting a game in Italy then you would imagine there would be less interest and probably cheaper than Shankland.
God stop talking about this guy. Its as bad as Candeias chatTwo questions;
1) If we had kept him and didn't sign Lammers would we have won the league?
2) Considering he's not getting a game for Parma this year would you resign for say 2m?
For me both are yes. Could have easily seen him and Dessers getting 15 goals a piece and complement each other; Dessers having better overall play but Colak being a natural finisher.
If he's not getting a game in Italy then you would imagine there would be less interest and probably cheaper than Shankland.
No and fn No.Two questions;
1) If we had kept him and didn't sign Lammers would we have won the league?
2) Considering he's not getting a game for Parma this year would you resign for say 2m?
For me both are yes. Could have easily seen him and Dessers getting 15 goals a piece and complement each other; Dessers having better overall play but Colak being a natural finisher.
If he's not getting a game in Italy then you would imagine there would be less interest and probably cheaper than Shankland.
What did Francis Jeffers do to upset you?I'm holding out for the Sebo/James Beattie twin strike force.
Add to center half s and we would win leagueKent, Colak, Morelos, Aribo, Weiss, Windass and Waghorn in the summer.
Kyle Laffery is a free agent and knows what it’s all about.When is the Sakala thread going up?
At Malmo he was excellent as we found outhe wasn't a great footballer
Agree on both your pointsI would have kept him and Sakala at time.
But dont want either back now, need younger fitter fresher players.
Add to center half s and we would win league
It's not a wind up
The KLF did something similar.We would get more value out of filling a wheelbarrow with £2m and setting it on fire.
Why spend £2m on a striker who isn’t scoring goals?Two questions;
1) If we had kept him and didn't sign Lammers would we have won the league?
2) Considering he's not getting a game for Parma this year would you resign for say 2m?
For me both are yes. Could have easily seen him and Dessers getting 15 goals a piece and complement each other; Dessers having better overall play but Colak being a natural finisher.
If he's not getting a game in Italy then you would imagine there would be less interest and probably cheaper than Shankland.
1) NoTwo questions;
1) If we had kept him and didn't sign Lammers would we have won the league?
2) Considering he's not getting a game for Parma this year would you resign for say 2m?
For me both are yes. Could have easily seen him and Dessers getting 15 goals a piece and complement each other; Dessers having better overall play but Colak being a natural finisher.
If he's not getting a game in Italy then you would imagine there would be less interest and probably cheaper than Shankland.
No and no. He's no where good enough.Two questions;
1) If we had kept him and didn't sign Lammers would we have won the league?
2) Considering he's not getting a game for Parma this year would you resign for say 2m?
For me both are yes. Could have easily seen him and Dessers getting 15 goals a piece and complement each other; Dessers having better overall play but Colak being a natural finisher.
If he's not getting a game in Italy then you would imagine there would be less interest and probably cheaper than Shankland.
£2m for a player who can’t get a game for Parma?Two questions;
1) If we had kept him and didn't sign Lammers would we have won the league?
2) Considering he's not getting a game for Parma this year would you resign for say 2m?
For me both are yes. Could have easily seen him and Dessers getting 15 goals a piece and complement each other; Dessers having better overall play but Colak being a natural finisher.
If he's not getting a game in Italy then you would imagine there would be less interest and probably cheaper than Shankland.
Two questions;
1) If we had kept him and didn't sign Lammers would we have won the league?
2) Considering he's not getting a game for Parma this year would you resign for say 2m?
For me both are yes. Could have easily seen him and Dessers getting 15 goals a piece and complement each other; Dessers having better overall play but Colak being a natural finisher.
If he's not getting a game in Italy then you would imagine there would be less interest and probably cheaper than Shankland.
I mean, it'd be a better option than Colak TBFWhen is the Sakala thread going up?
I think it was criminal that we sold him tbh. Great finisher and would have thrived on all these balls into the box.Two questions;
1) If we had kept him and didn't sign Lammers would we have won the league?
2) Considering he's not getting a game for Parma this year would you resign for say 2m?
For me both are yes. Could have easily seen him and Dessers getting 15 goals a piece and complement each other; Dessers having better overall play but Colak being a natural finisher.
If he's not getting a game in Italy then you would imagine there would be less interest and probably cheaper than Shankland.
Aye all he could do was score goals, ffsNo and no. He wasn't good enough. Could put the ball in the pokey but didn't offer much else.