Cinch deal

C

Cpfbear

Member
Read a few statements on SPL potentially suing Rangers had we won the league and not displaying "CINCH". It will come out as they will be a email lost/deleted showing this possible documented corruption and just a coincidence in really bad ref decision this year or just the norm on SPL standard of refs. 4 years to go on CINCH deal.
 
Cpfbear said:
Read a few statements on SPL potentially suing Rangers had we won the league and not displaying "CINCH". It will come out as they will be a email lost/deleted showing this possible documented corruption and just a coincidence in really bad ref decision this year or just the norm on SPL standard of refs. 4 years to go on CINCH deal.
Click to expand...
Suing us for what??

Spfl are the ones needing sued for this clusterfuck,we have a conflict of interest with parks and do not need to sign any cinch deal as per the SPFLs own rulebook

F*** them
 
Seems to be a lot of talk about this on Celtic minded social media. Almost as if Rangers had won a major trophy at the weekend. Meanwhile Rangers fans could not give a rats arse about the crappy wee deal the SFA brokered, unless the OP is insinuating the SPFL / SFA assisted Celtic winning the league deliberately ?
 
Last edited:
Bordersbear said:
Seems to be a lot of talk about this on Celtic minded social media. Almost as if Rangers had won a major trophy at the weekend. Meanwhile Rangers fans could not give a rats arse about the crappy wee deal the SFA brokered, unless the OP is insinuating the SFA assisted Celtic winNing the league deliberately.
Click to expand...
You only need to revisit the offside goals , handball goals and play until they score to know what the f..k has gone on here plus this weekends article about cinch shitting it if we won the league
 
Scott1975 said:
Suing us for what??

Spfl are the ones needing sued for this clusterfuck,we have a conflict of interest with parks and do not need to sign any cinch deal as per the SPFLs own rulebook

F*** them
Click to expand...
Newspaper rhetoric.

Not one report on this deal has ever questioned the SPFL agreeing to it when they knew prior to it's signing that Rangers wouldn't advertise cinch.

Not one journalist has the stones to question why such a poor deal was agreed, nor why it needed a middleman taking 10% in commission.

None have questioned why the SPFL fought tooth and nail to exclude Douglas Park from the legal process, when it was his business that was to be affected.

It's a pretty open and shut case really.
There's more chance of me suing my high school for tripping in a corridor 30 years ago, than there is of Rangers being sued here.

Let's be honest, if there was a chance to sue Rangers, it would have happened months ago.
 
A bit of deny and deflect from the cup win. I'm sure the SPFL and the placemen in the media will continue to drip feed these stories in the press in an attempt to pressure us into accepting the awful cinch deal. We're legally in the right based on what's public. The SPFL signed the deal even after we told them not too, but their arrogance and corruption thought we would get in line. Nope.
 
Cpfbear said:
Read a few statements on SPL potentially suing Rangers had we won the league and not displaying "CINCH". It will come out as they will be a email lost/deleted showing this possible documented corruption and just a coincidence in really bad ref decision this year or just the norm on SPL standard of refs. 4 years to go on CINCH deal.
Click to expand...

Who was making these statements?
 
It’s all about perception … the spfl are in the wrong and they know it

These articles and whispers are spin to make us look like we are to blame when in fact they are

The Scottish media are only to happy to oblige

Our PR is dreadful
 
The SPFL may very well be in the wrong here but I just don’t see what good can come of our position on this matter.

It’s a distraction we could do without.
 
Kingdom Bear said:
It’s all about perception … the spfl are in the wrong and they know it

These articles and whispers are spin to make us look like we are to blame when in fact they are

The Scottish media are only to happy to oblige

Our PR is dreadful
Click to expand...
This is one instance when I think our PR is spot on.

We have absolutely no case to answer here and shouldn't be dragged into public mud slinging.

Let the SPFL and their media lapdogs make an arse of themselves. Let them whip up the Rangers hating hordes, then let them all be wondering how the hell they've been let down again if this ever reaches a conclusion.
 
cinch spoke to their potential investors prior to a recent share issue and spoke of margin levels per customer of 10%, even 15%.

Their Margin per customer is in the veyr low single figures.

Unless this changes wildly, and, erm, it won't.....they are finished.
 
Brookfield Bear said:
The SPFL may very well be in the wrong here but I just don’t see what good can come of our position on this matter.

It’s a distraction we could do without.
Click to expand...
Rangers position is that they are following the SPFL regulations.
The SPFL were advised that there was a conflict, but chose to ignore this, and signed the contract anyway.
 
It's Rangers who should be suing the SPFL not the other way round.

Twice last season they completely moved the goalposts and changed rules/fixtures at the midway point and next season they'll do it again by starting VAR in December by which time some seriously bad refereeing decisions could have been made to shape the title race.

The SFA also completely changed the rules of the Scottish cup season before last as well.

Guess who got the benefits of these decisions?
 
Bordersbear said:
Seems to be a lot of talk about this on Celtic minded social media. Almost as if Rangers had won a major trophy at the weekend.
Click to expand...

Lol
Celtc fans are like a fat, bitter, jilted bride, running round the doors trying to stir up shit about the ones who care not a jot for them.
 
Kingdom Bear said:
It’s all about perception … the spfl are in the wrong and they know it

These articles and whispers are spin to make us look like we are to blame when in fact they are

The Scottish media are only to happy to oblige

Our PR is dreadful
Click to expand...


Sweet Fanny Addams are useless, corrupt bastards same as their pal infantino and his fuukin mob.


And don't say they ain't cos there's always a link.
 
Doncaster will ultimately get his jotters over this farce.

It must have cost the SFA a fortune going through the courts trying to attack Rangers, whilst defending his own duplicative actions.

He’s a proven liar, a costly one at that, and it’s going to cost HIM his job!
 
When does the prize money get dished out?
The league will need that carrot for whatever their next vote against Rangers is.
 
Not the SPFL, but some clubs in the SPFL IF a number of things happened.

- we won the League
- there was no Cinch branding visible
- Cinch then cancelled the contract

Then some clubs made noises about suing Rangers for lost earnings
 
GazzaG said:
Newspaper rhetoric.

Not one report on this deal has ever questioned the SPFL agreeing to it when they knew prior to it's signing that Rangers wouldn't advertise cinch.

Not one journalist has the stones to question why such a poor deal was agreed, nor why it needed a middleman taking 10% in commission.

None have questioned why the SPFL fought tooth and nail to exclude Douglas Park from the legal process, when it was his business that was to be affected.

It's a pretty open and shut case really.
There's more chance of me suing my high school for tripping in a corridor 30 years ago, than there is of Rangers being sued here.

Let's be honest, if there was a chance to sue Rangers, it would have happened months ago.
Click to expand...

It’s a complete shambles of a deal as you say. Worth a pittance. Ridiculous commissions involved. A nonstarter for the biggest club in the country.

But rather than other clubs and the media asking the correct questions as to why the league entered such a shambles of a deal, it has presented everyone with the opportunity to do what they enjoy best and paint Rangers as the bogeyman in all of this.

I couldn’t care less about the deal with Cinch. I do however hope the club are sitting up and taking note of the fact that it’s clear the powers that be don’t want us anywhere near the league title for sponsorship reasons.
 
They would have absolutely zero case against Rangers. However, Cinch might have a case against them. Might explain why their refs were under strict instructions to let Celtic away with anything and us nothing. Just to throw a rumour out there. :shh:
 
Another one of those where our board needs a spine but probably won't display it

we all know Scottish football doesn't have "integrity" but if we've deliberately been denied a league and CL money that we worked so hard to get for this country then we need to investigate it ourselves
 
It’s not worth calling it a deal, not even a poor deal, it’s an unbelievably bad deal.
The SPFL should hang their heads in shame that their overpaid morons couldn’t find a proper deal than that poundland effort that they had to pay an intermediate to find for them. More than smacks of incompetence, more like corruption you could argue.
 
Candyass said:
cinch spoke to their potential investors prior to a recent share issue and spoke of margin levels per customer of 10%, even 15%.

Their Margin per customer is in the veyr low single figures.

Unless this changes wildly, and, erm, it won't.....they are finished.
Click to expand...
Cinch and Cazoo are making %^*& all ROI on all these big sponsorship deals.
 
Porto Loyal said:
Not the SPFL, but some clubs in the SPFL IF a number of things happened.

- we won the League
- there was no Cinch branding visible
- Cinch then cancelled the contract

Then some clubs made noises about suing Rangers for lost earnings
Click to expand...
Rangers are not part to any deal with Cinch - There are no grounds for legal action on that basis.
 
devilman said:
They would have absolutely zero case against Rangers. However, Cinch might have a case against them. Might explain why their refs were under strict instructions to let Celtic away with anything and us nothing. Just to throw a rumour out there. :shh:
Click to expand...
Any legal action taken by Cinch would be against the SPFL.
 
Bordersbear said:
Seems to be a lot of talk about this on Celtic minded social media. Almost as if Rangers had won a major trophy at the weekend. Meanwhile Rangers fans could not give a rats arse about the crappy wee deal the SFA brokered, unless the OP is insinuating the SPFL / SFA assisted Celtic winning the league deliberately ?
Click to expand...

There is more than enough evidence there to suggest there was plenty underhand shenanigans going on to hamper Rangers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SCG
devilman said:
They would have absolutely zero case against Rangers. However, Cinch might have a case against them. Might explain why their refs were under strict instructions to let Celtic away with anything and us nothing. Just to throw a rumour out there. :shh:
Click to expand...
Totally agree.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SCG
adidasler said:
Any legal action taken by Cinch would be against the SPFL.
Click to expand...
Yup, just can't understand why the SPFL would think they would have any case against Rangers. It's already been proven in a court of law that Rangers have done nothing wrong with regards to the Cinch deal. So, what would be their point.

Regardless, it didn't happen so they don't need to worry about it. Perhaps what they should worry about is getting competent people on board that firstly, get the country's football a better deal and secondly, not %^*& it up by not check the facts behind who can do what.
 
devilman said:
Yup, just can't understand why the SPFL would think they would have any case against Rangers. It's already been proven in a court of law that Rangers have done nothing wrong with regards to the Cinch deal. So, what would be their point.

Regardless, it didn't happen so they don't need to worry about it. Perhaps what they should worry about is getting competent people on board that firstly, get the country's football a better deal and secondly, not %^*& it up by not check the facts behind who can do what.
Click to expand...
This is what keeps Scottish Football firmly in the dark ages.

Most clubs are just happy keeping the lights on and think a sponsor giving them enough money to paint a stand or renovate their changing rooms is enough.
 
Willem Bear said:
Doncaster will ultimately get his jotters over this farce.

It must have cost the SFA a fortune going through the courts trying to attack Rangers, whilst defending his own duplicative actions.

He’s a proven liar, a costly one at that, and it’s going to cost HIM his job!
Click to expand...
They will only get rid of Doncaster when celtic have no use for him.
 
Kingdom Bear said:
It’s all about perception … the spfl are in the wrong and they know it

These articles and whispers are spin to make us look like we are to blame when in fact they areThe Scottish media are only to happy to oblige
Our PR is dreadful
Click to expand...
On the 21st of October 2021 the court of session issued an instruction that the SFA that they carry out an independent aribitration on the Cinch matter and yet still no hearing It’s almost like they know that they(SFA/ SPFL ) can’t win this one
In 2020 Hearts/ P Thistle went to court to appeal their relegation The court of session on 03/07/2020 instructed the SFA to deal with this by independent arbitration
On 27/07/2020 that decision was made by the arbitration panel
 
I understand that two sponsorship payments are due to the SPFL and the suits at Hampden are sweating about it as they will be unable to pay out the end of season prize money clubs are due. And many clubs are desperate for the money, just as they were two years ago which forced them to vote for closing the season early.
 
If anyone has seen what the Scottish Premiership winners medals looked like this year, there is no chance we were winning it.

Literally a medal with "CINCH" engraved in massive letters across it. Think it then says Scottish Premiership Winners, 2021/22 underneath the big cinch engraving.
 
The board cannot blame Cinch for not investing more on players or allowing them to manipulate the break to suit them.

This board are needing to grow some balls and not just fight when it's them in the spotlight.
 
Hopefully it annoys cinch that a Scottish team got to the final of a major European competition and throughout the season refused to participate in the deal they agreed with SPFL. They will be within their rights to claim that the contract hasn’t been fulfilled and pull out. The delay tactics by their corrupt cabal also allows Cinch to delay any court actions.
 
nasalsinatra said:
I understand that two sponsorship payments are due to the SPFL and the suits at Hampden are sweating about it as they will be unable to pay out the end of season prize money clubs are due. And many clubs are desperate for the money, just as they were two years ago which forced them to vote for closing the season early.
Click to expand...
They will just blame big bad Rangers.
I've already heard fans of other clubs question if "we will have the cheek to take league prize money given how we have tried to sabotage the sponsorship deal"

That's how your average moon howler is thinking here...and that will include other SPFL club chairmen.
I can see the the SPFL try to withhold our prize money whilst the "Cinch Row" rumbles on at their haven't a fecking clue snails pace. They've signed a deal that isn't viable and have no way out.
 
Not reading all the crap. The SFA or Cinch did not make McGregor balls 2 goals against Ross county. Did not make us throw away a 2 goal lead against Motherwell. We fucked up. End of discussion.
 
Vinted said:
Not reading all the crap. The SFA or Cinch did not make McGregor balls 2 goals against Ross county. Did not make us throw away a 2 goal lead against Motherwell. We fucked up. End of discussion.
Click to expand...

Haha.

Ignore incompetent Referees, Assistant Referees, 4th Officials, corrupt manipulation of fixtures and rule changing half way through the season.

Ignore the Rangers haters in positions of power within the SFA, SPFL and Referees Committee.

Ignore all the CFC loving politicians and media luvvies/journalists with their 'unbiased' public statements about us.

You've nailed it. The only things wrong in Scottish Football, the only things that cost us the league was Shagger having a bad game in Dingwall and Motherwell managing to pull back a 2 goal deficit.

:eek:
 
Riccles said:
Haha.

Ignore incompetent Referees, Assistant Referees, 4th Officials, corrupt manipulation of fixtures and rule changing half way through the season.

Ignore the Rangers haters in positions of power within the SFA, SPFL and Referees Committee.

Ignore all the CFC loving politicians and media luvvies/journalists with their 'unbiased' public statements about us.

You've nailed it. The only things wrong in Scottish Football, the only things that cost us the league was Shagger having a bad game in Dingwall and Motherwell managing to pull back a 2 goal deficit.

:eek:
Click to expand...
I am not sure where you read in my answer "the only thing wrong with Scottish football". There is more wrong with Scottish football, but winning the league is done on the park, and that is where we failed. Did the SFA ban Gio from using Tav as an attacking player when he first came in. That is when we lost the most points. Did the SFA appoint Uri Gellar to make McGregor drop the ball. The rules changed for everyone, we should have been able to handle that, surely. It is easy to blame the referee's but we also have to look at the whole picture and that is that Rangers lost the league for themselves,
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

Latest posts

Back
Top