I agree in principle with what you are saying.
my take on it and always has been that our boards should be left to run the club. Club 1872 should go through the Clubs Representative, in this case our SLO for anything to do with fans concerns regarding , Safe Standing,moving away fans,disabled fans, behaviour of opposition fans/managers, away allocations/RSC etc.
It is the his job to pass them on to the relevant person ? department to deal with.
Club 1872 should be able to put their point about shares or the Corporate running of the Club at the AGM and demand written answers.
If Club 1872 put a member on the Board,he or she would need to sign a NDA and in truth be able to tell us very little, would then be accused of Blazer chasing, which I think it is, be better to have an agreement that 2 of 1872 coud have an hour of the Boards time, say every second board meetings, where they could give them a list of question, have a discussion with them about the questions and the board could get back to them and put the answaers in writing
Then all the members could judge how the Club's board and indeed Club 1872's board are performing.
That is transparency