It is unfortunate that Australia's colours are green and gold as I have had the same problems with my own Brother in Law. I also refused to buy a rugby shirt while I was there
Country founded by convicts.
you cant have a conversation with the Borg Collective. They live in a green bubble and spend their whole life searching for all things Rangers, Everything we say they look for conflict and always play the victim. best ignored.Yup, no longer engage with any of that lot I know on football matters as is pointless
This is fantastic news, are we finally getting back where we belong ?A new commercial era is here for Rangers
Yesterday the support was given the news we had all collectively craved for eight years. The final remaining legacy issue removed from around our clubs neck and the real possibility to move forward…fourladshadadream.blog
Have you read the 4lads blog yet VB?I will be much happier when I read confirmation the Court cases are settled and ended.
Nevertheless, the war with the Fat C*nt is 'won' if we have broken free from his shackles and that is fantastic.
Have you read the 4lads blog yet VB?
So Unibet on the front instead of 32Red next season?
Like you VB, I get totally that we have a fresh start as regards a new deal and no SDI involvement in that. A massive step forward. The litigation - I.e. whether or not that has all been resolved or is ongoing - remains something I am unclear about. The 4Lads piece mentioned that it had been said on Heart and Hand that all litigation has been resolved. I confess that when I listened to H&H yesterday I didn’t hear them say that. Maybe they did and I just I missed it. Or, if they did, maybe H&H were swept along by the reference to a clean slate. That said, to me the litigation is by far the secondary issue as compared to having a new retail and kit deal with a partner we trust and want to be in business with. That is huge. If the historic litigation is still rumbling around then all (and I don’t mean to be glib about that) we are litigating about is who owes who what by way of contractual payments and damages. If the outcome of that is that we owe SDI and / or Elite £x then so be it. It will stick in the craw for sure but at least it will all be about legacy issues and not about the future. But if the litigation has indeed already been resolved then that would be superb.Ach Shug, I made an arse of it when I read it and didn't scroll down below the image - so I missed the Q&A bit at the bottom.
All sounds positive. I can 'get' the bit about SDI failing to match the new deal. The litigation, I think, is still a bit of wait and see to find out the detail I fear.
As I've said several times on a variety of threads though, escaping the Fat C*nt's clutches is winning the 'war'. If it comes at a price it is, nevertheless, likely to be worth it in the longer term.
Like you VB, I get totally that we have a fresh start as regards a new deal and no SDI involvement in that. A massive step forward. The litigation - I.e. whether or not that has all been resolved or is ongoing - remains something I am unclear about. The 4Lads piece mentioned that it had been said on Heart and Hand that all litigation has been resolved. I confess that when I listened to H&H yesterday I didn’t hear them say that. Maybe they did and I just I missed it. Or, if they did, maybe H&H were swept along by the reference to a clean slate. That said, to me the litigation is by far the secondary issue as compared to having a new retail and kit deal with a partner we trust and want to be in business with. That is huge. If the historic litigation is still rumbling around then all (and I don’t mean to be glib about that) we are litigating about is who owes who what by way of contractual payments and damages. If the outcome of that is that we owe SDI and / or Elite £x then so be it. It will stick in the craw for sure but at least it will all be about legacy issues and not about the future. But if the litigation has indeed already been resolved then that would be superb.
A new commercial era is here for Rangers
Yesterday the support was given the news we had all collectively craved for eight years. The final remaining legacy issue removed from around our clubs neck and the real possibility to move forward…fourladshadadream.blog
I don't doubt the blogs.Ach Shug, I made an arse of it when I read it and didn't scroll down below the image - so I missed the Q&A bit at the bottom.
All sounds positive. I can 'get' the bit about SDI failing to match the new deal. The litigation, I think, is still a bit of wait and see to find out the detail I fear.
As I've said several times on a variety of threads though, escaping the Fat C*nt's clutches is winning the 'war'. If it comes at a price it is, nevertheless, likely to be worth it in the longer term.
Tim's are starting to spread a potential tango
Got a text from a tim saying Fat man is a silent partner in Castore
I don't doubt the blogs.
I understand everything regarding costs has been met, matched agreed and is no more.
SDI were held to the £1m damages limit and as they owed us money , and had shown no desire to actually manufacture, retail or distribute anything for RFC the judgement has been to rescind all contractual obligations between the two.
That is my reading of what I've seen over the past couple of days
You might not have to worry about that. Shares in Fraser Group are tanking and the fat man might not have a business left by the time this is over. I guessing this is why he’s out of Newcastle and us to salvage his core business jumble sale direct.Good news.
I still won't be buying from the Fat man though.
Surely no one is that thick as to beleive that?
Sadly there’s plenty evidence to the contrary.
Show.me some evidence?
Poorly worded on my part, perhaps. I’m meaning there’s a history of people believing such nonsense - not that there’s evidence to support said nonsense.
The thing I’d like to know, it was said gravy veins had an option to match any deals in perpetuity, I wonder if that’s still the case?
Outstanding newsThat only applied if he continued to match. The first time he chooses not to match at renewal time then that lapses. This appears to be what has happened this time around.