Compliance Officer

allyscott

allyscott

Well-Known Member
I take it she isn't going to cite Clare? Can't really see how she can now cite any other player retrospectively if that is an acceptable challenge.

Also silent on Avril's comments.
 
I'll go against the grain here.
I'm quite happy the player isn't being cited.
We'll get no benefit from this.
If he's banned, he'll be unavailable for games against our rivals, not against us.
 
allyscott said:
I take it she isn't going to cite Clare? Can't really see how she can now cite any other player retrospectively if that is an acceptable challenge.

Also silent on Avril's comments.
Click to expand...

CL is an interesting one. Lennon was allowed to say something almost identical after they played the filth away, and our own gaffer wasn’t cited after his opening day comments either.

However Steve Clarke HAS been charged this season though, as have we (as a club) over the Collum statement.

Not sure Clare will be cited as the ref seen it at the time and ‘punished’ him, by awarding us the free kick. Isn’t it just for incidents the ref or officials have missed?

Whole thing is a bit of a farce.
 
cooprfc said:
It shouldn't be looked at imo. It was a bad tackle but where do we draw the line with this interfering after the game is finished? Most games have tackles which are just as bad if not worse than that.
Click to expand...
The only caveat being that no Rangers player is cited in a similar scenario?
 
allyscott said:
I take it she isn't going to cite Clare? Can't really see how she can now cite any other player retrospectively if that is an acceptable challenge.

Also silent on Avril's comments.
Click to expand...

She be waiting until after her Knights of the,I cant believe I hate prods more than jews, holy shamrock meeting.

Either that or until the eve of Hearts important European tie...................................
 
Crown_Defender said:
CL is an interesting one. Lennon was allowed to say something almost identical after they played the filth away, and our own gaffer wasn’t cited after his opening day comments either.

However Steve Clarke HAS been charged this season though, as have we (as a club) over the Collum statement.

Not sure Clare will be cited as the ref seen it at the time and ‘punished’ him, by awarding us the free kick. Isn’t it just for incidents the ref or officials have missed?

Whole thing is a bit of a farce.
Click to expand...
My understand (could be bollox) is the while Madjin gave a foul he failed to give an appropriate card therefore the compliant burd could get off her perch (on Pete's says so) and cite him. Depends if a subsequent ban affects St.Pats.

Do I sound too cynical?
 
TommyEgan said:
There was no card issued. That's the only way he could have dealt with it.
Click to expand...

If the ref seen it but didn't deem it worthy of a card then I don't think the Compliance Officer gets involved.

Not saying it's right, just that this'll be the excuse.
 
tazzabear said:
I'll go against the grain here.
I'm quite happy the player isn't being cited.
We'll get no benefit from this.
If he's banned, he'll be unavailable for games against our rivals, not against us.
Click to expand...

I agree with.

The officials got big decisions wrong at the weekend, but they got them wrong at both ends. I can just about live with the shocking tackle given our winning goal. Probably the wrong way to look at it right enough.



Gogso said:
My understand (could be bollox) is the while Madjin gave a foul he failed to give an appropriate card therefore the compliant burd could get off her perch (on Pete's says so) and cite him. Depends if a subsequent ban affects St.Pats.

Do I sound too cynical?
Click to expand...

I’m genuinely not sure. I know that he can get involved for stuff he’s seen, but failed to act correctly, like diving, but not sure about ‘lenient punishments.
 
To the people saying “ ach these things happen in football “ and “ don’t want to go down that road “ , I’ll leave you with one question .

If it’s Alfredo Morelos who commits the exact same foul as Sean Clare did on Sunday , do you think for a single minute that the clamour from BT Sport, Sportscene and all the other haters out there wouldn’t have already ensured that he’d have been cited already and hit with a retrospective red card ?

Turning the other cheek has failed us for so long .

I want Clare cited and banned because A/ it was a dangerous challenge which is a clear red card . And B/ because if it was a Rangers player he would be cited .

Simple.
 
Axelrod said:
To the people saying “ ach these things happen in football “ and “ don’t want to go down that road “ , I’ll leave you with one question .

If it’s Alfredo Morelos who commits the exact same foul as Sean Clare did on Sunday , do you think for a single minute that the clamour from BT Sport, Sportscene and all the other haters out there wouldn’t have already ensured that he’d have been cited already and hit with a retrospective red card ?

Turning the other cheek has failed us for so long .

I want Clare cited and banned because A/ it was a dangerous challenge which is a clear red card . And B/ because if it was a Rangers player he would be cited .

Simple.
Click to expand...

I don't because he shouldn't be. It was a bad tackle. Happens in every game and sometimes it's our players who do it. I can't remember very many of our players being cited for a bad tackle.

If this is now cause to be cited, we would be cited most.
 
cooprfc said:
I don't because he shouldn't be. It was a bad tackle. Happens in every game and sometimes it's our players who do it. I can't remember very many of our players being cited for a bad tackle.

If this is now cause to be cited, we would be cited most.
Click to expand...

Garbage . “Happens every game” ?? Dearie me

It’s not even a tackle .

It’s an instant red , a dangerous studs up straight leg lunge , which is a red card every day of the week.

Are you for real saying we commit that type of challenge more than anyone else ??

Very strange.
 
cooprfc said:
I don't because he shouldn't be. It was a bad tackle. Happens in every game and sometimes it's our players who do it. I can't remember very many of our players being cited for a bad tackle.

If this is now cause to be cited, we would be cited most.
Click to expand...
Testicles.
 
Crown_Defender said:
CL is an interesting one. Lennon was allowed to say something almost identical after they played the filth away, and our own gaffer wasn’t cited after his opening day comments either.

However Steve Clarke HAS been charged this season though, as have we (as a club) over the Collum statement.

Not sure Clare will be cited as the ref seen it at the time and ‘punished’ him, by awarding us the free kick. Isn’t it just for incidents the ref or officials have missed?

Whole thing is a bit of a farce.
Click to expand...

If they don't charge Avril, it gives us the perfect defence against our charges.
 
cooprfc said:
I don't because he shouldn't be. It was a bad tackle. Happens in every game and sometimes it's our players who do it. I can't remember very many of our players being cited for a bad tackle.

If this is now cause to be cited, we would be cited most.
Click to expand...
Bollocks - it wasn’t a bad tackle, it was a horrendous challenge which has no place in football. The best way to eliminate such challenges is to hammer the players who commit them, at the time or retrospectively.

Your last comment is the biggest bollocks of all.
 
Axelrod said:
To the people saying “ ach these things happen in football “ and “ don’t want to go down that road “ , I’ll leave you with one question .

If it’s Alfredo Morelos who commits the exact same foul as Sean Clare did on Sunday , do you think for a single minute that the clamour from BT Sport, Sportscene and all the other haters out there wouldn’t have already ensured that he’d have been cited already and hit with a retrospective red card ?

Turning the other cheek has failed us for so long .

I want Clare cited and banned because A/ it was a dangerous challenge which is a clear red card . And B/ because if it was a Rangers player he would be cited .

Simple.
Click to expand...
As I posted earlier, it isn't Rangers who benefit from this lad being banned.
He might actually be banned from the septic game weakening them at the very time we'd want Hearts being at their strongest.
Other than that, I do agree with your post.
 
Axelrod said:
Garbage . “Happens every game” ?? Dearie me

It’s not even a tackle .

It’s an instant red , a dangerous studs up straight leg lunge , which is a red card every day of the week.

Are you for real saying we commit that type of challenge more than anyone else ??

Very strange.
Click to expand...

No. I'm saying if people started getting cited for tackles, we would benefit the least as we seem to get 'done' by the compliance officer more than anyone.
 
cooprfc said:
No. I'm saying if people started getting cited for tackles, we would benefit the least as we seem to get 'done' by the compliance officer more than anyone.
Click to expand...

Probably true but as I said mate think about what I’ve posted re Morelos . He’d have been hung by now if he had made that challenge .

For me we must contest everything to the nth degree just to let them know we won’t accept being treated differently any more .
 
Paisley Ger said:
Bollocks - it wasn’t a bad tackle, it was a horrendous challenge which has no place in football. The best way to eliminate such challenges is to hammer the players who commit them, at the time or retrospectively.

Your last comment is the biggest bollocks of all.
Click to expand...

No. My last comment is completely accurate. I think you have misinterpreted it.

We get done more than anyone by compliance officer. The last thing we need is the ability to be cited for a bad tackle. It's bad enough when one of our players sneezes on another off the ball.
 
Axelrod said:
Probably true but as I said mate think about what I’ve posted re Morelos . He’d have been hung by now if he had made that challenge .

For me we must contest everything to the nth degree just to let them know we won’t accept being treated differently any more .
Click to expand...

I agree with you Morelos would be crucified.

I just don't think tackles like that should be punished retrospectively and would fully expect us to lose out in the long run if a precedent was set.
 
cooprfc said:
It shouldn't be looked at imo. It was a bad tackle but where do we draw the line with this interfering after the game is finished? Most games have tackles which are just as bad if not worse than that.
Click to expand...
The point being if one of our players made the same tackle it would be replayed with 50 different camera angles, would be the major talking point on Jokescene and then this complete and utter sham of compliance officers position would most certainly act. Get the picture?
 
cooprfc said:
I don't because he shouldn't be. It was a bad tackle. Happens in every game and sometimes it's our players who do it. I can't remember very many of our players being cited for a bad tackle.

If this is now cause to be cited, we would be cited most.
Click to expand...
Sorry but I really have to say this, “ what a lot of pure and utter fecking garbage”.
Have you just returned from the moon?
 
Gogso said:
My understand (could be bollox) is the while Madjin gave a foul he failed to give an appropriate card therefore the compliant burd could get off her perch (on Pete's says so) and cite him. Depends if a subsequent ban affects St.Pats.

Do I sound too cynical?
Click to expand...
You sound like a rambling lunatic.
 
Ponientebear said:
The point being if one of our players made the same tackle it would be replayed with 50 different camera angles, would be the major talking point on Jokescene and then this complete and utter sham of compliance officers position would most certainly act. Get the picture?
Click to expand...

The point being.. .has anyone been cited before for a tackle which the ref has given a foul for?

No. Therefore he shouldn't be cited. Otherwise we will lose out in the long run. Another excuse to pull our players up and highlight any bad tackle we make from 50 angles.
 
Ponientebear said:
The point being if one of our players made the same tackle it would be replayed with 50 different camera angles, would be the major talking point on Jokescene and then this complete and utter sham of compliance officers position would most certainly act. Get the picture?
Click to expand...
They do that already! So a bit of parity would be most welcome. You're Very keen on Clare not getting done.
 
Axelrod said:
To the people saying “ ach these things happen in football “ and “ don’t want to go down that road “ , I’ll leave you with one question .

If it’s Alfredo Morelos who commits the exact same foul as Sean Clare did on Sunday , do you think for a single minute that the clamour from BT Sport, Sportscene and all the other haters out there wouldn’t have already ensured that he’d have been cited already and hit with a retrospective red card ?

Turning the other cheek has failed us for so long .

I want Clare cited and banned because A/ it was a dangerous challenge which is a clear red card . And B/ because if it was a Rangers player he would be cited .

Simple.
Click to expand...
If would have been done first thing Monday morning
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

Latest posts

Back
Top