Japandroid
Well-Known Member
He wasn't booked
I know. But if the ref decided it wasn't worthy of a booking, I'm not sure he can be cited now.
He wasn't booked
Drink some more good quality red wine, you might catch up...You sound like a rambling lunatic.
That's always been the rule mate, if you aren't booked then you can be done. And remember he saw it at a glance.I know. But if the ref decided it wasn't worthy of a booking, I'm not sure he can be cited now.
I thought avril was cited today.
He wasn't booked therefore he can be done retrospectively. The referee failed to punish him accordingly. I don't know if you're at the wind up or just a strange fellow.
We'll have to agree to disagree, and the powers that be will always find an angle re us.There's absolutely nothing strange about what I'm saying at all mate.
The referee saw the incident and awarded a free kick. Therefore he can't be done.
Nothing at all strange about not wanting tackles to start getting pulled up retrosoectively because I just know we will lose out it in the long runonce that precedent is set and receive no advantage to their player being suspended now.
i'm probably wrong m8.Surely not, it’s just Lennon who can say what he wants then.
We'll have to agree to disagree, and the powers that be will always find an angle re us.
That's always been the rule mate, if you aren't booked then you can be done. And remember he saw it at a glance.
You're not wrong, but that was down to bad refereeing, there's nothing can now be done as the incompetent ref saw it and decided it was simply a free kick.To the people saying “ ach these things happen in football “ and “ don’t want to go down that road “ , I’ll leave you with one question .
If it’s Alfredo Morelos who commits the exact same foul as Sean Clare did on Sunday , do you think for a single minute that the clamour from BT Sport, Sportscene and all the other haters out there wouldn’t have already ensured that he’d have been cited already and hit with a retrospective red card ?
Turning the other cheek has failed us for so long .
I want Clare cited and banned because A/ it was a dangerous challenge which is a clear red card . And B/ because if it was a Rangers player he would be cited .
Simple.
If player not carded can still be done by compliance officer factI thought it was only for incidences missed by the ref, and the foul wasn't missed. He just chose not to card the player. Maybe not though.
They'll say the ref seen it and dealt with it at the time, so he can't be cited now.
I don't because he shouldn't be. It was a bad tackle. Happens in every game and sometimes it's our players who do it. I can't remember very many of our players being cited for a bad tackle.
If this is now cause to be cited, we would be cited most.
If player not carded can still be done by compliance officer fact
All it takes is someone to report it . Even a member of the public .
Clare, Avril and female compliance officer.
Girl power will rule.
Morelos commits Clare’s foul tomorrow night, he sees a red card and gets a 3 game ban.
That’s a fact, the game is corrupt as %^*&. If the ref misses it, the compliant tim doesn’t.
Spot on .... we would never have gotten away with that tackle on Sunday , imagine that was Morelos on Berra , they would be wanting him sine died for it. The referee incompetence is beyond parody .Bearing in mind one tackle was careless and the other was downright thuggery that could have had caused serious injury. Compare Arfields challenge with Clares and ask yourselves which was more worthy of a straight red card. As usual the ref punishes us heavily again. Its about time the Scottish refs were cited for incompetence.
That is down to the weak referees and the perception being driven by the media and pricks like Levein that Morelos is a nasty little thug who deserves everything he gets.
How many Rangers players have actually been cited by this latest compliance officer ?
Was it the compliance officer who rescinded the Morelos red card against Aberdeen ? Or is appeals process different ?