“Apologies” from journalists are meaningless because they only write them when they are effectively coerced by the lawyer of the offended party.
Is he not dead yet?
No, still smells like a damp goat though.
This is what they should have started doing years ago.The Club should not seek apologies for defamation anymore....... Sue the feckers arses off from now on in !
Spot on journos in this country constantly bang on about sectarianism but they've been making a living off it for yearsThat c unt has made a living on the back of sectarianism.
I don't think he has made a living from sectarianism,from what i see it's just an unhealthy hatred of us.That c unt has made a living on the back of sectarianism.
Hahaha! Sounds like his Grindr profile.An arriviste golf hack who never broke a story, analysed a tactic or turned down a free lunch, especially if succulent lamb was on the menu.
Defender of nonces, bare faced liar and one of the few journalists in the liberal western world who believes in thought crime.
A first rate second rate man, the idol of all morondom: Graham 'Spiersy' Queers
It’s what they do, print a full page story, then apologise in a single paragraph on page 26.Problem is though that once a story is out there a printed apology doesn't really undo the damage done. Spiers is a fud, as said above.