WestEndGer18
Active Member
For all the proponents of VAR, the idiots would still be making the decisions. https://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/sport.../james-keatings-red-card-against-21530573.amp
As I said on an earlier thread, VAR would not help us in the slightest. The people reviewing any incidents involving us would be the same people who cheated us the previous week.
The thing is, everybody will see the truth.As I said on an earlier thread, VAR would not help us in the slightest. The people reviewing any incidents involving us would be the same people who cheated us the previous week.
Not really relevant, is it?He's a mentally challenged chunt anyway .
There would be no pressure unless the decision was to the detriment of FC Bheast. When has the truth ever bothered these c.unts?The thing is, everybody will see the truth.
There will be no hiding place.
I’ve never been known to be naive but, I just can’t see the people making these decisions, which will be a lot more publicised than just five minutes on Sportscene, putting themselves under that pressure.
For some it's the only thing that's ever relevant.Not really relevant, is it?
I get it mate, and I get where you’re coming from.There would be no pressure unless the decision was to the detriment of FC Bheast. When has the truth ever bothered these c.unts?
They need to use the rugby method big screens showing the incident and refs miked up.Exactly. The technology provides another avenue to have poor decisions. Can you imagine us getting many decisions against us over turned.
I agree but this one instance it certainly wasn’t a dive. There was plenty contact to knock him over and I don’t even think he really appealed for the free kick.It's not how modern football always views it, but in my opinion if a striker goes down under contact, it can still be a dive. Feeling a touch as light as a feather and flopping like a salmon is a dive.
that’s a shocking decision. Even if the ref thought he dived and got it wrong, how the hell can a panel say the ref was correct?
Because it shows that a red card incident in the game when reviewed via the Video Part of VAR is pretty clear. We still have idiots who can and will see it the way they want to see it.What does the panel's decision to not overturn the referee's decision have to do with VAR btw?
I don't see where this extra publicity would be. We have refs cheating against us every game and the only place it's pointed out is on here. Emails are sent with proof of cheating to various media outlets regularly and nobody takes the opportunity to highlight these "honest mistakes". Lets remember these refs are willing to openly cheat us in a national cup final and a game at the Glitterdome both of which were shown live to an audience of millionsI get it mate, and I get where you’re coming from.
I think I’m banking on the extra publicity making the truth the only option.
Naive?
More like a fecking sermon!
There is so much being made of this decision
In the media and the Inverness statement even references PFA, other clubs and other players getting in touch to show support etc.
Ok - it’s a disgraceful decision by the appeals panel not to turn it over, that’s 100% fact
But what about St. Mirren last year with DC that wasn’t over turned? What about us losing a cup final due to a decision, what about the numerous Alfie reds, what about the decisions that are essentially costing us points week in week out right now, where’s the outrage and support there?
There is so much being made of this decision
In the media and the Inverness statement even references PFA, other clubs and other players getting in touch to show support etc.
Ok - it’s a disgraceful decision by the appeals panel not to turn it over, that’s 100% fact
But what about St. Mirren last year with DC that wasn’t over turned? What about us losing a cup final due to a decision, what about the numerous Alfie reds, what about the decisions that are essentially costing us points week in week out right now, where’s the outrage and support there?
I know that but where was the outrage? Where were all the players and clubs back then getting in touch to voice how hard done by we were?They couldn't rescind Candeias' second yellow card because the rules don't allow it. With this incident you can get yellow cards rescinded if it was for diving I'm sure.
How do you pronounce that?He's a mentally challenged chunt anyway .
Many people on here think that the powers in Scottish football, the BBC and the rest of the media have an agenda against us. I don't but let's say for the sake of argument that they do, why would VAR change that? Why does it take away a hiding place? If everyone is against us then who would be giving wrong decisions more publicity?The thing is, everybody will see the truth.
There will be no hiding place.
I’ve never been known to be naive but, I just can’t see the people making these decisions, which will be a lot more publicised than just five minutes on Sportscene, putting themselves under that pressure.
I’m having difficulty putting this one into words.Many people on here think that the powers in Scottish football, the BBC and the rest of the media have an agenda against us. I don't but let's say for the sake of argument that they do, why would VAR change that? Why does it take away a hiding place? If everyone is against us then who would be giving wrong decisions more publicity?
In my opinion, the standard of officiating and the appeals process isn't corrupt, it's just crap. If they can't see that this second yellow should be rescinded then what's the point in it?
I’ve just posted in favour of this idea but, given that referees cannot or will not explain themselves today, I don’t see this happening.They should have to issue video evidence alongside the clear rationale for the decision on every appeal. At least that provides some form of accountability.
just a factual statementNot really relevant, is it?