Gobby twatFucking hell lads.
Fucking hell.
My first impression!
If today it must be in Belgium?
Maybe jones can be a bit head down, but definitely seems more effective than barkerIs it the case that Barker just does a better job of taking on board the manager's comments, criticisms and instructions?
I personally can't see 'it' with Barker as I do with Jones, but if we're beating them so comprehensively away from home with him in the team I find it difficult to suggest that JJ should start ahead of Barker.
I would do cartwheels for the manager and do anything he told me to do on the pitch. Doesnt mean Im any good though.Is it the case that Barker just does a better job of taking on board the manager's comments, criticisms and instructions?
I personally can't see 'it' with Barker as I do with Jones, but if we're beating them so comprehensively away from home with him in the team I find it difficult to suggest that JJ should start ahead of Barker.
That's what I mean - he 'seems' more effective than Barker. However, thinking of Roofe's interview about how everyone has a job I would guess that the reason Barker starts ahead is because of the ability to demonstrate that he understands his job and how to do it. He might not be amazing at every part of the job that's been asked of him but he does understand and is committed to carrying out that job.Maybe jones can be a bit head down, but definitely seems more effective than barker
Barker is a large part of how we got our 2nd. His drive forward and then pass to Kent got us the corner which lead to the goal. Granted I would generally prefer Jones too, but Barker isn't as bad as some folk make out. He just offers something different. If Jones could put in the work that Barker does then I reckon Stevie would start him.He should have started on Saturday instead of barker.
I don't really understand your point sorry.I would do cartwheels for the manager and do anything he told me to do on the pitch. Doesnt mean Im any good though.
Barker is a large part of how we got our 2nd. His drive forward and then pass to Kent got us the corner which lead to the goal. Granted I would generally prefer Jones too, but Barker isn't as bad as some folk make out. He just offers something different. If Jones could put in the work that Barker does then I reckon Stevie would start him.
It probably is but we’re Rangers and, in Scotland, you shouldn’t really need to ‘waste’ an attacking player on a specific defensive duty for a full game in any league match outside the mentally challengeds - even against them, I’m not even sure they’re good enough to justify that.Is it the case that Barker just does a better job of taking on board the manager's comments, criticisms and instructions?
I personally can't see 'it' with Barker as I do with Jones, but if we're beating them so comprehensively away from home with him in the team I find it difficult to suggest that JJ should start ahead of Barker.
Good point mate.It probably is but we’re Rangers and, in Scotland, you shouldn’t really need to ‘waste’ an attacking player on a specific defensive duty for a full game in any league match outside the mentally challengeds - even against them, I’m not even sure they’re good enough to justify that.
Papes, Liege and Livi in a week virtually, this is where we’ll see if we’ve learned our lesson in regards to not ragdolling the same 13 players constantly.
Definitely not in the European squadIs he definitely not in Europa squad thus not travelling or?
Was to busy watching the Jones skillsAye cause Standard Liege have Rangers badges plastered over their stands. Not to mention being sponsored by Castore, 32Red and advertising the Scottish prem.
Something players playing infront of him
would never attempt
love him to get a decent run