Michael Stewart. Is he the thickest pundit in Scottish football?

George Goudie

Well-Known Member
Official Ticketer
I think he has to be, yet he really thinks he delivers an erudite and informed view - the sanctimonious sandy haired dunce actually thinks he is engaged in a complex discourse, one that we troglodytes are far too dense to comprehend.

His arrogance is astonishing, you would think the mental gymnastics he labours on are supposed to be critiques that help shape the views of society.

He's a thick ginger Natsi YESSER wank.

Tonight on BBC Scotland Radio he stated: it's not Rangers job or the supporters job to report on the safety issues within a football stadium. There are other people that do that.

Well freckles - let me tell you - you are fucking wrong yet again.

It's EVERYONE'S responsibility under H&S legislation to report risks and dangers ya thick twat.
 
Nothing more funny than an idiotic twat who likes to think he's intelligent.

He's the Scottish version of that episode of friends where Joey uses a thesaurus to make himself sound smart.

At least he'll always have his degree on bio-mechanics of the human body to fall back on once he fails as a pundit like he's failed at everything else.
 
I think he has to be, yet he really thinks he delivers an erudite and informed view - the sanctimonious sandy haired dunce actually thinks he is engaged in a complex discourse, one that we troglodytes are far too dense to comprehend.

His arrogance is astonishing, you would think the mental gymnastics he labours on are supposed to be critiques that help shape the views of society.

He's a thick ginger Natsi YESSER wank.

Tonight on BBC Scotland Radio he stated: it's not Rangers job or the supporters job to report on the safety issues within a football stadium. There are other people that do that.

Well freckles - let me tell you - you are fucking wrong yet again.

It's EVERYONE'S responsibility under H&S legislation to report risks and dangers ya thick twat.

Imagine employers telling employees and the public, "don't tell us about any hazards that you notice, we have our own people that do that". They would get shafted by regulators.
 
I think he has to be, yet he really thinks he delivers an erudite and informed view - the sanctimonious sandy haired dunce actually thinks he is engaged in a complex discourse, one that we troglodytes are far too dense to comprehend.

His arrogance is astonishing, you would think the mental gymnastics he labours on are supposed to be critiques that help shape the views of society.

He's a thick ginger Natsi YESSER wank.

Tonight on BBC Scotland Radio he stated: it's not Rangers job or the supporters job to report on the safety issues within a football stadium. There are other people that do that.

Well freckles - let me tell you - you are fucking wrong yet again.

It's EVERYONE'S responsibility under H&S legislation to report risks and dangers ya thick twat.

This thread needs a poll @George Goudie .

It'll be some length of list though...:)
 
I don’t even remember Stewart as a player so he must have been shite considering it wasn’t that long ago.

As a pundit he is one boring bastard. Personality of a bog brush and the only time he stands out is when he’s said something utterly moronic, case and point here.
 
SPORT
Michael Stewart slams Rangers over reaction to Rugby Park chaos and sectarian singing
Stewart also took aim at the Rangers supporters for sectarian chanting in the away end at Kilmarnock.

  • SHARE







By
Fraser Wilson
  • 19:58, 5 AUG 2019
  • UPDATED20:01, 5 AUG 2019
(Image: SNS Group)
Get the biggest Rangers stories by email
Subscribe
See our privacy noticeMore newsletters
Michael Stewart has called for Rangers to stop "putting caveats" on their own fans' behaviour after the chaotic scenes at Rugby Park on Sunday.

ADVERTISING


inRead invented by Teads
Supporters destroyed a disabled shelter at their own end as they staged a pitch invasion following Connor Goldson 's last gasp winner.

The scenes came after hundreds of supporters had missed the start of the match due to a turnstile problem - with reports that Gers fans had forced open a gate allowing crowds to flock in.
Former Hearts and Hibs midfielder Stewart also took aim at the Rangers support after sectarian chants were heard throughout the match.
Stewart, speaking on BBCSportsound, accused Ibrox chiefs of paying lip service to the problem - just two weeks after they launched a high-profile diversity programme 'Everyone Anyone'.
READ MORE

Rangers released a statement on Monday afternoon, vowing to punish the supporters who invaded the park and caused the disabled section roof to collapse.

But they blamed Kilmarnock for the scenes outside the ground before kick-off which saw hundreds of Rangers fans 'crush' against a gate as turnstiles were unable to cope before a gate was forced open allowing them to flock in.





The Ibrox club said: "Rightly or wrongly a gate was forced but the real cause of the serious congestion and crushing which occurred outside the stadium before and after kick-off cannot be disguised.
"The failure of Kilmarnock's ticketing system caused the problem and this has to be addressed."
But, asked who was to blame for the scenes outside the ground before kick-off, Stewart said: "There are issues that obviously have to be looked at with regards how Kilmarnock are policing and stewarding games at Rugby Park but also Rangers as a club have to shoulder some of the burden here aswell.

"With the naked eye it looks as if there are too many fans in the stands. Now if the gate was only forced open for 60 seconds then that's not as if there's Rangers fans turning up to the game with no ticket on the back of hearing there's a gate open lets go.
"They are obviously there at the get-go.
"I don't think Rangers statement starting 'rightly or wrongly a gate was forced' is the right way to start off - these things should just be condemned.
"There was not an issue of crushing because it was outside, it was not a confined space.
READ MORE

"It's wrong for the gate to be forced open because you don't know who is going in, that's a security issue in itself.


"Kilmarnock obviously, as I said, have to look at the structures they have in place.
"We then have to look at the situation that's just a continuation of something that's been going on forever. Within 90 seconds there's chants of sectarian nature. Why?
"I don't understand why fans can't sing about things positively, rather than everything being negative and aggressive and angry.

(Image: Steve Welsh)
"Rangers launch a campaign just a couple of weeks ago about everyone and anyone welcome to the club. Yet within 90 seconds fans are shouting about people being dead and up to their knees in blood. What's that go to do with football?
"We talks about what are the authorities going to do about it? Well the authorities need to face this up. This is the first weekend - we spoke about it endlessly last season - nothing that I'm aware of on Saturday happened of this nature.
"Yet the Rangers game comes along away from home and this aggressive nature, why?
"Rangers need to get round the table with other clubs and stop paying lip service to this. That's all that's going on.
"Rangers have to take a firmer stance than going down the route of saying 'rightly or wrongly a gate was forced open'.
"They need to actually condemn these things and stop putting caveats on it."

(Image: SNS)
Scottish clubs and police promised a crackdown on fan misbehaviour following a rise in incidents during the last campaign.
But clubs resisted taking on strict liability which sees them held accountable for the behaviour of their fans and a series of punishments - including stand closures and docked points - imposed.
Stewart continued: "We talk about nothing happens because it is lip service that's paid and the old thing that it's turkeys voting for Christmas.
"We have this whole chat about strict liability and then you get the classic response that it doesn't work. (SPFL chief) Neil Doncaster came out and said evidence shows that in Europe it doesn't work - well sorry Neil but can you provide that evidence? You can't just say it doesn't work.
"Nobody is advocating that Rangers sectarian singing yesterday, jumping on the roof, that they should be docked three points for that. But something needs to happen, there needs to be some real consequences to the actions.
"If you go through the stages of a fine, potential closure of a stand and then if the fans are still acting in this way then to me the only thing that would deter them would be if their club was docked points. But that's the end point."
Four people were arrested following Sunday's chaos and Rangers vowed to take appropriate action against those responsible for the scenes at the end of the match.
The statement added: "Rangers does not condone the behaviour of those fans who invaded the pitch and who caused the damage to the facility housing disabled supporters.
"The appropriate action will be taken to deal with those who can be identified but it should be pointed out Rangers had made Kilmarnock aware of concerns over facilities for the disabled at Rugby Park."


KILMARNOCK FCKilmarnock 'horrified' by Rangers fans’ behaviour as Ibrox club slam Rugby Park ticketing failure
ABERDEENTwo adults and child airlifted to hospital after Aberdeen beach rescue
NICOLA STURGEONNicola Sturgeon says conversations with Theresa May were 'soul destroying'

KILMARNOCKKilmarnock stadium has 'number of safety issues that need addressed urgently' say council officials


_______________________
We really really really really really really really really really need to boycott one club a season.

Hurt them in the pocket.

Start with Kilmarnock.
 
Killie fans were literally singing the same song throughout the match.

I mean that's not whataboutery. They were literally singing the exact same song (1 word apart).

Poor Ayr. I mean it's fine to be up to your knees in their blood, but not those little rascally 19th Century Terrorists

He is a laughing stock. Levein treats him the way he should be treated
 
Ridiculous stuff once again. The caveat the media are using in our condemnation to attempt the slightest show off impartiality here is feigning a piss thin lick of sympathy for the problems which could have occurred outside of the stadium due to Kilmarnock's inefficiency to organise away support correctly.
Fans should not be subjected to a potential crush. Never should this be seen again not only in Scottish football but world sport and all member clubs of the SPFL should be made ensure that this is a top priority on their grounds. Our fans were also short changed into the bargain with missing part off the game they had paid Kilmarnock effectively to watch.
As for the shelter, as careless the actions were of the individuals a roof should not give way with ease with a couple off people on it. I suspect this is nothing more than a corrugated tin roof which will be held together with stitchers and lack off primary support or similar. Surely the people building the shelter would have thought, given the proximity of this to the stands some idiots may jump on this thing better make sure it’s strong enough to take some weight. The stadium and its surroundings should be subject to a full HSE inspection including the match day procedures and processes of Kilmarnock FC and their security contractors.

I get the point with the whole fans in the pitch thing I really do but personally I see nothing wrong with the fans celebrating with the team. This was a few fans out the seats, celebrating and then return back to their seats. Not storming a pitch, assaulting fans and players like witnessed on a grander national scale in the not too distant past.
Such a precious bunch in the media they really are.
 
Failed trialist.Thats a part of where his hatred of us stems from.The rest is because he is a ginger Nat prick.
You wonder who failed the audition for Sportscene if that was good enough to get the job.
 
Wispy looking prick that he is, that's everyone set a high standard of anti Rangers bigotry in all things fans being crushed, pitch encroachment and ticketing failures. Letter make sure everyone is held at the same standard and highlight the hypocrisy of them during the season
 
I think he has to be, yet he really thinks he delivers an erudite and informed view - the sanctimonious sandy haired dunce actually thinks he is engaged in a complex discourse, one that we troglodytes are far too dense to comprehend.

His arrogance is astonishing, you would think the mental gymnastics he labours on are supposed to be critiques that help shape the views of society.

He's a thick ginger Natsi YESSER wank.

Tonight on BBC Scotland Radio he stated: it's not Rangers job or the supporters job to report on the safety issues within a football stadium. There are other people that do that.

Well freckles - let me tell you - you are fucking wrong yet again.

It's EVERYONE'S responsibility under H&S legislation to report risks and dangers ya thick twat.
I see he had go at us for singing sectarian songs,well if any had the word 19th Century Terrorist in them it must be ok as him and his ilk have no problem with the wonderful always funny Celtic supporters having a banner up proclaiming them as a 19th Century Terrorist Army.Lets see if cloth ears hears anything at Fir Park next Sunday .
 
As I've said on another thread, he states no one is advocating docking us points to advocating docking us points almost in the same breath. Biomechanics or downright stupidity?
 
I think he has to be, yet he really thinks he delivers an erudite and informed view - the sanctimonious sandy haired dunce actually thinks he is engaged in a complex discourse, one that we troglodytes are far too dense to comprehend.

His arrogance is astonishing, you would think the mental gymnastics he labours on are supposed to be critiques that help shape the views of society.

He's a thick ginger Natsi YESSER wank.

Tonight on BBC Scotland Radio he stated: it's not Rangers job or the supporters job to report on the safety issues within a football stadium. There are other people that do that.

Well freckles - let me tell you - you are fucking wrong yet again.

It's EVERYONE'S responsibility under H&S legislation to report risks and dangers ya thick twat.

He is dickhead.end of.
 
He may or may not be thickest but that’s not important. Is he the most biased, bitter and devious would be a more relevant question imo. Unfortunately it’s a very difficult question to answer as he has plenty of competition who have a freehand at attacking our club almost on a daily basis. For what it is worth I don’t think he is very bright and the same can be said for most of his contemporaries. Please Rangers target one of these shysters and ruin their careers by proving they are both thick and most importantly biased and bitter.
 
Last edited:
so.the big issue is fans being crushed ,well he just dismissed that by saying it's not possible because it wasnt a confined space ,seriously the guys a knob ......but let's get onto the BIG story of the game yes you got it rangers fans singing.
 
Clearly doesn't understand crowd dynamics if he thinks a crush cant happen outside a football ground

Crushing can’t happen outside. Where do you even start with that shite? He’s obviously been swayed by the amount of absolute dung posted on Twitter over the last couple of days. Some people have even gone as far as to draw maps and diagrams of the stadium and surrounding streets, accompanied by arrows pointing to areas and labelled ‘open space’. Yes really.
I’ve been in a few crushes over the years at games, when you are at the front and getting crushed, you don’t have the feckin option of retreating into all the lovely space in surrounding areas. It’s ridiculous to even suggest such utter nonsense.
I have also seen pictures posted showing Rangers fans milling about before the game, standing talking amongst themselves. The photos have been lifted from the official Rangers site and been offered as ‘proof’ that there was no crush. In their haste to write off the notion that there could have been a crush, some people are willing to believe such flimsy ‘evidence’.
 
Here's how i imagine my conversation wuth Michael Stewart...

Me "So Michael, what's the difference between Rangers singing that particular song and Kilmarnock singing it?"

MS "Ah, but Rangers fans used the word 19th Century Terrorist, and that's sectarian"

Me "So how come you didn't mention anything about the Celtc fans' '19th Century Terrorist' banner at Parkhead?"

MS "Erm... cos I work for the BBC and i hate Rangers"
 
Michael Stewarts BBC Interview:

-Hi Michael

- Haiyay min

- Do you hate Rangers?

- Aye, cos they rejected me

- Do you want to spend the next three years slagging them off on national television?

- Aye, a I prefer men, cos they rejected me

- Will you do it with pure hatred and bile and hold up the BBCs double standards to the highest degree?

- Aye, a will , cos of them rejecting me n that

- Sign here.
 
Back
Top