New training top - much nicer in person

ScottXC

Well-Known Member
That's a lot nicer than shown in the website, thanks for posting OP. A definite for fives for the grey one for me. Any photo's of that one?
 

gerz1873

Well-Known Member
Nothing wrong with the top, a few fashonistas on here had their panties in a bunch over it. Peak FF
 

SouthsideRangers

Well-Known Member
Official Ticketer
Not a fan of it in all honesty, second sponsor logo is a bit unnecessary. Thought the majority of this season's training gear was excellent, with exception to the daft 'leisure wear'.
 

RFC_Champions

Well-Known Member
Probably so the sponsor is on show when the manager etc is sitting behind a desk/table at the press conferences.
Possibly.... but you’d think the dozens of sponsors on the back drop would be enough.

Or move the main sponsor up to the shoulder rather than having another one.

But if it brings in extra money - I’m all for it. Just a bit silly looking imo.
 

M@x

Well-Known Member
Possibly.... but you’d think the dozens of sponsors on the back drop would be enough.

Or move the main sponsor up to the shoulder rather than having another one.

But if it brings in extra money - I’m all for it. Just a bit silly looking imo.
End of the day mate it's a training top, not something you're going to wear to the dancing or out for a meal.
 
Last edited:

IanGers

Well-Known Member
32 Red on the shirt twice, training or not, is too much. It's the first thing my eye was drawn to.
I do like the style of the top though.
 

Stanley Yelnats

Well-Known Member
What’s the point of the smaller 32red sponsor near the shoulder....

Understandable if it’s on the back but it’s practically 6” from the main 32red sponsor.
32 Red will be paying extra for it.

It means when players or managers or doing interviews the logo is on show. Most of the time it’s only above the players chest that is shown on camera.
 

usbear

Well-Known Member
What’s the point of the smaller 32red sponsor near the shoulder....

Understandable if it’s on the back but it’s practically 6” from the main 32red sponsor.
So its visible even when wearing training vests? Maybe? Probably more for headshots like the previous poster mentioned.
 

Bluebrox

Well-Known Member
If we were being paid an absolute fortune then maybe it would be acceptable, but we won't be. That's the frustration.
 

SHOTTSLOYAL

Well-Known Member
Possibly.... but you’d think the dozens of sponsors on the back drop would be enough.

Or move the main sponsor up to the shoulder rather than having another one.

But if it brings in extra money - I’m all for it. Just a bit silly looking imo.
Because we’re not yahoo’s
 

donka

Well-Known Member
Got my training top delivered today - looks to me one of the best training tops they have had even looks like a normal strip save for the darker blue patches.
 

a_weir

Well-Known Member
What’s the point of the smaller 32red sponsor near the shoulder....

Understandable if it’s on the back but it’s practically 6” from the main 32red sponsor.
My understanding is that training pictures are harder to get the sponsors logo prominent, so here we are.

Matches have line ups, plenty of angles, interviews etc but with training the journos who will give exposure to 32red only get a small amount of time (15 mins?) per week, from one location, to shoot images.
 

Finfaecarrick

Well-Known Member
Official Ticketer
What is the sizing like, bought 2 for this season, took advice and went up a size but still terrible fitting as tight in chest area but baggy in the gut.
 

clubdeckcharlie

Well-Known Member
Official Ticketer
What’s the point of the smaller 32red sponsor near the shoulder....

Understandable if it’s on the back but it’s practically 6” from the main 32red sponsor.
When you're training, the main sponsor logo is hidden by the training bib.

https://media.Rangers.co.uk/uploads/2018/06/190618_training_beale_bibs_01.jpg
 
Last edited:
Top