Could that turn out to be one of the costliest decisions we will ever make or not make as it goes?
Quite possibly but we were skint at the time clearly.Could that turn out to be one of the costliest decisions we will ever make or not make as it goes?
Still took on diomande and big wages on silvaQuite possibly but we were skint at the time clearly.
However against scum when they play maieda he has to defend as doest have the pace to go forward and midfield don't cover anymore when he doesA number 9 isn’t the issue. Dessers has missed a lot of sitters but his goal return has actually been decent. The issue is we have nobody anywhere else on the park who can chip in with goals. Tavernier only chips in because he’s our set piece specialist.
Been saying the same on here for years. We just don’t control games especially against them.You could put any striker in the world up front and it wouldn’t make a difference. The midfield is our problem and has been for years. How many goals and assists have Lawrence, lundstram, diomande etc scored between them this season?
Even Matondo, 2 of the 4 of them we’d have done much betterThe injuries on the flanks have killed us IMO.
Cortes, Sima & Ridvan.
There is far too much dead wood constantly injured that needs cleared outBeen saying the same on here for years. We just don’t control games especially against them.
Not adequately replacing Davis, an obsession with no. 10s and hoping Jack will be fit has held us back for years.
100%. Some people just won’t let go of the striker narrative.The injuries on the flanks have killed us IMO.
Cortes, Sima & Ridvan.
To be fair to big Cyreil he took his one chanceI just don’t think that was our issue today. What striker in the world changes how today went for us?
Could that turn out to be one of the costliest decisions we will ever make or not make as it goes?
No. Would’ve been nice but we created nothing today. Midfield we get out played by McGregor and ORiley every timeCould that turn out to be one of the costliest decisions we will ever make or not make as it goes?
We rarely win the ball in midfield to take control.No. Would’ve been nice but we created nothing today. Midfield we get out played by McGregor and ORiley every time
The Board, Douglas Park et al, need a long hard look at themselves. Their interview and vision of “win mer trophies at Rangers” still embarrasses me to this day.We couldn’t afford one the board had given a complete clown like Beale every penny they had with absolutely no oversight.
Think we need to look at our defence before a number 9Could that turn out to be one of the costliest decisions we will ever make or not make as it goes?
Todd too. As creative as he appears to be, his actual contributions haven’t been good enough.You could put any striker in the world up front and it wouldn’t make a difference. The midfield is our problem and has been for years. How many goals and assists have Lawrence, lundstram, diomande etc scored between them this season?
Middle to front we have been abysmal for a long time.You could put any striker in the world up front and it wouldn’t make a difference. The midfield is our problem and has been for years. How many goals and assists have Lawrence, lundstram, diomande etc scored between them this season?
our most dangerous player is still our right back. Says it allMiddle to front we have been abysmal for a long time.
A complete lack of mobility and control from our midfielders.
A lack of pace, creativity and goals from most of our wide players and strikers.
Been a theme for several seasons and it's never been properly addressed.
Disagree.Hindsight shows not signing a No 6 was a far bigger mistake.
Three big misses.The injuries on the flanks have killed us IMO.
Cortes, Sima & Ridvan.
We could have punted Derssers and kept Lammers.Quite possibly but we were skint at the time clearly.
We could have punted Derssers and kept Lammers.
Oh come on, we could have had Haaland or prime Klose upfront today and still lost. The lack of midfield and wide creativity cost us.We should have moved heaven and earth to bring in Shankland. We didn't, and we've paid the penalty.
Quite possibly but we were skint at the time clearly.