Stated Ref had the best view possible and called it right.
No penalty forward looking for contact which never came, yellow card correct.
No penalty forward looking for contact which never came, yellow card correct.
But Eilidh Barbour says its a penalty despite there being no contact. Just because.I find it odd that it's the decision to award a penalty or not up for debate.
If you get caught diving on the park you get a yellow card and it gets swept away, if it's found in hindsight then you are dragged through the mud for a week by the media. Eduoard should be getting slaughtered for his cheating yesterday.
And we all know why he won'tI find it odd that it's the decision to award a penalty or not up for debate.
If you get caught diving on the park you get a yellow card and it gets swept away, if it's found in hindsight then you are dragged through the mud for a week by the media. Eduoard should be getting slaughtered for his cheating yesterday.
Her opinion was also that that speccy skeletor looking bbc reporter Chris McLaughlin was worth a ride. This negates her opinion in everything. Everything.But Eilidh Barbour says its a penalty despite there being no contact. Just because.
Even though there was clearly no contact, its still a penalty.
I actually heard that on Radio Clyde yesterday from one of the " experts ". lol
Back to the kitchen with you , ya rancid mentally challenged boot !But Eilidh Barbour says its a penalty despite there being no contact. Just because.
Mark Wilson tried that one S.
An indirect free kick, yes.You can get a foul even if there is no contact if the player has to get out the way of the tackle in the same way a punch doesn't need to land to be a red card.
It was a dive all day long, and its only Ceptic cheerleaders calling for a penalty.
Mr Mark wilson Esq said in on SSBEven though there was clearly no contact, its still a penalty.
I actually heard that on Radio Clyde yesterday from one of the " experts ". lol
I hope they do. Keep the cheating cûnt in the news a bit longer.Interesting to see if they appeal the yellow for diving since they're so convinced it's a pen.
Stated Ref had the best view possible and called it right.
No penalty forward looking for contact which never came, yellow card correct.
Yes mate.Was it Dermot Gallagher on ref watch?
Can you appeal a yellow?Interesting to see if they appeal the yellow for diving since they're so convinced it's a pen.
Given the way Brown and Kennedy were after the game you would expect them to if they think its a penalty. If they don't then that tells you it wasn't.Interesting to see if they appeal the yellow for diving since they're so convinced it's a pen.
You can if its for simulation like we did with Alfie at Livingston recently.Can you appeal a yellow?
They are so predictable, in order to keep their dim witted lunatic hordes happy, they spin the 'we were robbed, pure stonewall penalty' re lego, bla bla bla, alls well down piggery way.
I heard him too.Mr Mark wilson Esq said in on SSB
i had it on yesterday after the gaem when i as cutting the grass lol
No contact but it was still a penalty haha unbelievable
Ah right. I knew you could for mistaken identity but wasn’t sure about this.You can if its for simulation like we did with Alfie at Livingston recently.
Be fair they have been getting penalties for less over the years.Given the way Brown and Kennedy were after the game you would expect them to if they think its a penalty. If they don't then that tells you it wasn't.
Said in another thread he goes down cause he takes a bad touch and knows he's lost the ball.
Aye their last 3 penalties at least have been for less than yesterday.Be fair they have been getting penalties for less over the years.
Theyve had several this season.Be fair they have been getting penalties for less over the years.
Stated Ref had the best view possible and called it right.
No penalty forward looking for contact which never came, yellow card correct.
Unless it involves Hibs players at Ross County and LivingstonI find it odd that it's the decision to award a penalty or not up for debate.
If you get caught diving on the park you get a yellow card and it gets swept away, if it's found in hindsight then you are dragged through the mud for a week by the media. Eduoard should be getting slaughtered for his cheating yesterday.
I recall the good old days when Aluko got cited for diving and ended up suspended....because even though there was contact, the panel felt it wasn't enough for him to go down.Even though there was clearly no contact, its still a penalty.
I actually heard that on Radio Clyde yesterday from one of the " experts ". lol
I think it's time , especially after winning the league, that rangers should highlight the double standards , and they've got plenty of evidence if anyone challenges them .Can someone get a video of the Sky ref watch circulated widely on social media.
I said it on another thread, Édouard has previous he has gone down more easily far more often than Morelos has.
The media won’t want to give him a reputation though.
Jacques Cousteau could’ve learned a thing or two from Odsonne’s simulation if he was still with us.The diving cheat should've been sent off.
His second dive was even worse than the first.