Not sure about that cross border part, possibly one to try buy back?
Presumably the £270k figure is what Villa are due for their, short, part in his development should he move on for free in 2025 at the end of his current contract.
Not sure about that cross border part, possibly one to try buy back?
He will never be back at us.More potential than even Billy Gilmour
Not sure about that cross border part, possibly one to try buy back?
Yes course it is, it’s also what we do to other teams especially in England.The question is.....is it actually worth our while having an academy if most of the absolute cream of the crop are poached for pennies?
The question is.....is it actually worth our while having an academy if most of the absolute cream of the crop are poached for pennies?
Time will tell but at the ages they left us, Gilmour was better.He will never be back at us.More potential than even Billy Gilmour
Just have a feeling Wilson has something extra.Time will tellTime will tell but at the ages they left us, Gilmour was better.
He had pretty much the pick of every top club going.
Nathan Patterson suggests it is.The question is.....is it actually worth our while having an academy if most of the absolute cream of the crop are poached for pennies?
Every time we lose a Patterson/Gilmour/Wilson we need to try to sign a Bassey/Sterling.The question is.....is it actually worth our while having an academy if most of the absolute cream of the crop are poached for pennies?
We supposedly got a fee of 350k for him when he went down to Villa. So although its a drop in the ocean of what he'll go on to be worth, it does soften the blow and make the academy worthwhile.The question is.....is it actually worth our while having an academy if most of the absolute cream of the crop are poached for pennies?
The question is.....is it actually worth our while having an academy if most of the absolute cream of the crop are poached for pennies?
That’s a question I’ve asked myself a few times,I think it would make a difference if the compensation was a bit more generous.The question is.....is it actually worth our while having an academy if most of the absolute cream of the crop are poached for pennies?
He will never be back at us.More potential than even Billy Gilmour
Just have a feeling Wilson has something extra.Time will tell
Does anyone know how much it costs each year to run the academy? Do we generally turn a profit? Genuine question as I don't know
You need them to be good but just not too goodThe question is.....is it actually worth our while having an academy if most of the absolute cream of the crop are poached for pennies?
I think this post should convince Stevie its not cool to dis the academy.To play in Europe, yip.
To get credit towards loses in FFP, yip.
To pinch other club’s players with the money we get paid when ours are pinched, yip.
To develop players like Patterson and make £16 million, yip.
That’s some of the many reason why we have to have an academy ill regardless if some of the best are gone before we see them.
No, you're not allowed to question anything. Or prompt any discussion on the forumSure Patterson, Gilmour and Wilson money would have covered a few years.
I’d rather an academy than a women’s team, am I allowed to say that
Exactly it's why you find the top clubs offering 2 year deals to 21 & 22 yr olds they want the development fee back for the training they've offered since that player joined , they sign loads of youngsters so they have to get money back in for their investment ...... rinse and repeatHe’ll never be back at Rangers, villa are covering their investment with a 5 year deal and I’d imagine he’ll be well sought after.
An academy will have more impact on the first team than the women's teamSure Patterson, Gilmour and Wilson money would have covered a few years.
I’d rather an academy than a women’s team, am I allowed to say that
Wilson left Rangers nearly 2 years ago mate.Can’t be from very good stock is all I can say .
He goes so be it just like Gilmour,I can’t blame them .
Paterson was and is and still went. Its not really a consideration these days, is it?Can’t be from very good stock is all I can say .
He goes so be it just like Gilmour,I can’t blame them .
Can't be from very good stock if he didn't know thatWilson left Rangers nearly 2 years ago mate.
Sure Patterson, Gilmour and Wilson money would have covered a few years.
I’d rather an academy than a women’s team, am I allowed to say that
Why bring negative comments about having a women’s team into a thread about something completely different?An academy will have more impact on the first team than the women's team
All part of the cycle, we need to be smarter with the Bailey Rice type playersExactly it's why you find the top clubs offering 2 year deals to 21 & 22 yr olds they want the development fee back for the training they've offered since that player joined , they sign loads of youngsters so they have to get money back in for their investment ...... rinse and repeat
was he in any of the under squads this week.Just have a feeling Wilson has something extra.Time will tell
I think that’s why Chelsea were trying to sell Gallagher it is just pure profit for FFP.Didn't know we could offset some FFP losses against it
Came off the bench for Scotland u19 against Italy a few days ago.was he in any of the under squads this week.
I must admit, I was disappointed with the few viewings I had of him particularly his first touch seemed erratic. The lad Doak at Liverpool looked to be on another level. Perhaps this is one where you bow to coaches superior knowledge.He’s not the best technically, quickest or strongest.
But, he has something you can’t teach, he just knows where to be at the right time to put the ball in the net.
Those pennies help to pay to run the placeThe question is.....is it actually worth our while having an academy if most of the absolute cream of the crop are poached for pennies?
I wouldn't use that as any kind of barometerwas he in any of the under squads this week.
was he in any of the under squads this week.
yip see aribo , bassey ..Yes course it is, it’s also what we do to other teams especially in England.
Access to Europe is probably the only thing that really decides it for us.To play in Europe, yip.
To get credit towards loses in FFP, yip.
To pinch other club’s players with the money we get paid when ours are pinched, yip.
To develop players like Patterson and make £16 million, yip.
That’s some of the many reason why we have to have an academy ill regardless if some of the best are gone before we see them.
Paterson went for £16m.Paterson was and is and still went. Its not really a consideration these days, is it?
My point still stands .Wilson left Rangers nearly 2 years ago mate.