Brant Hurley
Well-Known Member
Keevins is a hypocrite. That's far & away the nicest thing about him.
Keevins said it was a debatable offside he'd seen images where it looked both on and off
So what is the solution then?Nonsense.
The agenda has been set, debatably offside, evened up with the red and penalty.
No talk of other penalties not given, the controversial bit was Morelos not getting a red for committing half the number of fouls Cosgrove did last week. Etc Etc.
If they lose any game, regardless of the situation, we'll go back 8 or 10 phases if need be to find a foul that never happened and another ref mason conspiracy will be the cause.
Nothing surer, anyone who thinks otherwise has perhaps been in a coma since the year 1990? And beyond.
Surely he could upload a picture of King Billy as his avatar, thus adjusting his green background and in turn, making his argument stronger?His username begins with a 'C', therefore he has a green avatar. He has no say in the matter.
Stop the myth that the game was in our own hands?So what is the solution then?
He who shouts louder gets heard , the club needs a firmer take on the officiating of our games . Before the match I knew that we would not be getting any 50:50 decisions and any poor decisions would be to our detriment. This isn’t any paranoia, this is due to the amount of poor decisions going against us at crucial times . I’ve said for a long time that the biggest battle we are up against is off the field of play .
[/QUOTE
Press conference tomorrow is a good place to start.
Anybody ask him to produce these images that show it to be onside? I can produce one to show it is offside.
He can have as many images as he wants but the only one that counts is the one taken at the nano-second when the ball is struck.
I have not seen an image of their goal that throws into any doubt whatsoever the clear offside.
Does this image exist or is this some fabrication to help give the Kiddy Fiddlers some satisfaction that, in a game where they were played off the park, an officiating error was not also necessary for their only shot on target the entire game to be legitimate.
Also one of their players (In an offside position) blocks Helander who then had no chance of reaching the hall. A double whammy!!!He will be referring to the same images which claim he isn't offside because Helanders hand plays them onside. Even though a hand or arm cannot play anyone on or offside as only a part of the body you can score with matters.
I can guarantee you if the shoe was on the other foot and they lost the final to a similar off-side goal every single one of them would know the offside rule word for word. Keevins would be reading out the offside rule live on Clyde.
This is the one they're clinging on to
This is it from another angle, clearly offside.
Surely he could upload a picture of King Billy as his avatar, thus adjusting his green background and in turn, making his argument stronger?