Yep GY
The solution to that is to deduct the guilty party 3 points.No clubs will vote for this covid infections could = 3 points given to the opposite team no chance
If the poets aren't leading then 35What is an “insufficient number of games” ?
Voiding the league will not stop 10. It means that no title race was able to be held this season and that the scum quest was delayed one year.No, voiding the league would end 10 in a row.
The big issue for us is who enters the Champions league as winners if its voided when we are on top.
I disagree. The 9th title was awarded as the league couldn't be completed and the 10th is void.Voiding the league will not stop 10. It means that no title race was able to be held this season and that the scum quest was delayed one year.
Yes, but ppg this season disadvantages one club, who already have outstanding fixtures piling up and will have more in a few months to fit in the cup matches they thought they wanted.Precedent has already been set when they called the league on a points per game basis last season.
I know, didn't they tell us the consequences of that outcome were unimaginable?So now they can void the league? Wow. Just wow
Genuinely baffles me that they didn't have the foresight/common sense to set things in place before a new season was started.You can’t decide mid season to start imposing 0-3 result on sides.
Sums up the amateur sh*tshow that is the leadership of our game.
The precedent was set last season.
No-one cared about any ‘debate’.
It sounds like you want Celtic to benefit and Rangers to lose out when in exactly the same position.
Yes, but ppg this season disadvantages one club, who already have outstanding fixtures piling up and will have more in a few months to fit in the cup matches they thought they wanted.
Say they have 3 games in hand and are 9 points behind. Outstanding fixtures eminently winnable, but on ppg, you would need a 100% record to get the full 9 points.
They are not stupid. They are aiming for a vague outcome where the rules can be made up to suit, under the guise of consulting member clubs.
Interestingly, their unassailable lead from last season, if we only count fixtures played with last years top 6 this season, would be getting close right about now, if results so far were applied to last years competition.
It’s been annoying me for a while now. Don’t think a schedule of matches was ever made up ie which games were home/away. Presumably to prevent any kind of retrospective calculation of that sort. If we win the next OF game it might be worth a shot though!!!I was thinking that myself mate. We would basically be one victory against them and one more defeat or draw by them by another team to overcome their ‘unassailable’ lead.
I know, didn't they tell us the consequences of that outcome were unimaginable?
..........................after telling everyone last season, on the record, that Null & Void was impossible, couldn't happen and wasn't an option. Such is their brass neck it now appears as an 'option' in their questionnaire.So if they null and void the season after declaring places last year
IIRC there were 1001 reasons given by the cabal as to why voiding the league was impossible at the end of last season.
The cabal‘s work team are in the shit and have no road map outa said shit and hey presto voiding the league doesn’t seem to be a problem any more.
Who’d have thunk it?
They really are utterly shameless.
I don't see where it says that?Not really what it says is it? It says they are asking for those powers, including calling the league again.
Voiding the league will not stop 10. It means that no title race was able to be held this season and that the scum quest was delayed one year.
The club should be issuing a statement that at the very least would put pressure on the SPFL to be completely clear about the rules they propose.
It’s all far too ambiguous at the moment - which is exactly what the SPFL wants.
After this weekend, we will have completed more than a third of the season. This could turn out to be another Clusterfuck from the SPFLSo the financial ramifications of voiding a season with 8 games to go were of a degree that Scottish football would be ruined, but the ramifications of voiding a much larger number of games wouldn't be?
Part of why there was a rush to call the league was because games behind closed doors were seen as an unworkable option, but we're now a quarter of the way into a season where all games have been played that way. With no fans in the grounds, the usual public safety/fan travel requirements for games don't have to be considered, and a much more aggressive schedule can be implemented, if necessary to finish the season - similar to the format used for completing the Champions and Europa Leagues.
Not sure I would agree with your MINIMUM comment mate. I think most clubs will feed back that they think if we get to the point where everyone has played the opposition twice, home and away, then that is sufficient to say the season is complete and the team on top are Champions.People have badly misunderstood this and gone off on one.
Look at the questions in order.
Question 4 asks how many games need to be played for a result to be given (the MINIMUM this can be is however many games were played last season, just by the by)
Question 6 asks, IF the number in question 4 is not reached, will you give us power to void the league.
I get that people are paranoid with this shower, and with good reason, but this is not one of those occasions, the title of the OP is batshit mental and this thread is a bit of a red neck in all honesty.
Sorry, what I mean is that they cannot make any argument for MORE games than last season being required. I did not express it very well.Not sure I would agree with your MINIMUM comment mate. I think most clubs will feed back that they think if we get to the point where everyone has played the opposition twice, home and away, then that is sufficient to say the season is complete and the team on top are Champions.
I'd also argue that if we get to 2 Jan and some teams have still to catch up to reach that 22 fixture figure then all other games, if necessary, be held in abeyance until that point is reached.
Overall though you are correct, folk are jumping in and focussing on one point when it's actually a wide-ranging questionnaire with many options. Albeit a few months too late in the making.
They want flexibility so they can decide what to do depending on who's top. Our problem is no one cares outwith us and them as it doesnt affect others too much.
I probably read it wrong. No worries. Good to agree.Sorry, what I mean is that they cannot make any argument for MORE games than last season being required. I did not express it very well.
AbsolutelyThings are going to get worse over the winter regards COVID-19 and the tramps. We build up a decent 9 point or so gap and they will void the league to give them another shot at 10 if and when things return to normal.
One rule last season
New rule this season