kai-Johansen59
Well-Known Member
Yes I agree that DK deserves credit but the Club has to move on and any action by him, going forward, will not result in any money going into Rangers.I should add that, though I don’t agree with some of Dave Kings recent actions, we have to thank him for (a) getting control of enough shares with the other 2 bears to stop the previous regime pushing through all sorts of contractual rubbish and (b) creating the environment for future shareholdings to be spread over a number of holders. Indeed, King is still a major block to 75% control through his own holding which in turn isn’t big enough to be a threat.
He clearly wants/needs his money back and it looks like, in addition to the Club 1872 fiasco, he may well have sold some of his shares to someone else.
Also any sugar daddy arrangement (> 75%) is a bad idea as the past has proven.