Cheating 19th century terrorist bastardWillie Collum is a cheating bastard.
Smart arse.They didn’t score from the penalty.
Smart arse.
He never said he did.
Just saw that.Smart arse.
He edited it, he originally said he did.
even tho didnt score it still wasnt a penaltyThey didn’t score from the penalty.
Inhaled and that was enough to fall over . Should have been cautioned.It was never a penalty. It was clear as day that the Danish chap with the Irish name initiated the contact.
To me that is enough justification for the club to reopen the attack on Collum .Blatant cheating again but the club will keep their dignified silence empowering them to do it again on the 25th.
You don't get it do you???
Everything wrong with this forum today.
We've been cheated on VAR for two seasons now against that scum and you wish to disregard it.
How?It was the same scenario as regards the disallowed goal at Ibrox at the start of the season. Dessers kicks the defenders planted leg and goal is allowed.
Oriley kicks the defenders planted foot and gets a pen.
Same scenario regarding a foul but different outcome, both outcomes benefit the unwashed
Regardless of how it played out, the dying swan routine/flailing arms and legs as he threw himself to the ground should have been enough to reverse the decision and show a yellow card to O’Riley.A thought crossed my mind,was the not exactly the same scenario in the first game v them at Ibrox where the Celtic defender kicks dessers when he knicks ball from him and the defender kicks the back of his leg before he sets up the roofe goal
What the fcuk does that matter !They didn’t score from the penalty.
How?
It's the same outcome...
In both "fouls" the player who puts the leg in front is penalised
If you're breaking it down to the comparison between those 2 fouls its exactly the same decision thats given exactly the same way...
It's also completely ignoring the lateral movement from O'Reilly that initiates the contact with Diomande...
The thread title is 100% correct
What the fcuk does that matter !
mentally challenged rat paedo enablerShocking decision, not that it mattered in the end, but if it had a bearing on the result the uproar would be off the scale , how Collum can watch that back and still give a penalty is beyond me
Not the point, as I'm sure you realise.It wasn’t but I’m sure he missed it…
A moment that encapsulated all you need to know about Father Collum. He was called to the screen because even a blind man could see it was never a penalty and a theatrical dive. But not Collum, a biased and cheating rhat of a referee who should never be involved in games at the highest level. If only our board had fought harder last time he cheated us at Torbett Towers but they rolled over as usual.O’Riley kicks the ground and his other leg contacts Diomande. That was never ever a penalty. Even when Gollum went to the screen I knew he was going to give it. Playing against 12 men every time we play them.
You obviously don’t realise the OP initially said the penalty was their second goal and has since Edited it. That was what my reply was mentioningNot the point, as I'm sure you realise.
First glance, like always, it looks a penalty.
Several viewings later from different angles, it's clearly a dive from Reilly'O.
But hey-ho, despite Collum being diverted for cosmetic reasons to look at a screen, resultant decision is as we'd expect.
Surprised, said no-one ever!
He's a Cnut!