You used Gilmour as an example. He’s never been loaned out and has been appearing for Chelsea this season.Whit?
The easy answer is the last 7 years of shite
Attended the Ayr v Patrick game at the weekend basically to see how our 3 young loanees are fairing in "men's football ".Houston had a good game defensively for Ayr but doesn't look as good going forward.Palmer I felt sorry for ,he looks a good player but is playing in a side who don't even attempt to play football and the club really need to be careful when selecting where our loan players go.Kelly is a standout and has everything in his game to go all the way.Hopefully it will be with us as a guy next to me was saying he was disillusioned at not being with first team this year and will make a decision on his future in the summer.Lots of clubs watching him apparently.
We,as a support,don't have the patience to allow a youngster to develop in our first team. The pressure to win trumps everything. Unless a youngster is utterly exceptional they simply won't be given the time needed at first team level.It’s the system that’s fecked, clubs like Chelsea being allowed to hover up all the best young talent (Gilmour) and then loaning them out to this and that club is a farce and needs to be changed.
I actually agree,I think once we win the league we may well see one or two drafted in.I think when we win 55 the pressure of constantly winning, will be less than it has been and we will see more youngsters get a chance in the first team.
Sounded like he won't sign any extension unless he receives some assurance of first team squad involvement .He is certainly a far more rounded player than the likes of Docherty and Barjonas and actually reminds me of a young Ian Ferguson.Certainly one we don't want to miss out on.Kelly is contracted until Summer 2021. I'd imagine he will be offered a new deal in the next 6 months. So he will need to be making that decision sooner than next Summer. Rangers will look to sell him if he doesn't sign up.
I hope he stays. He has the current 'best chance' of the youngsters in my view. What we mustn't do is simply let him run down his contract to Summer 21 and walk away. He's too good for that.
Sounded like he won't sign any extension unless he receives some assurance of first team squad involvement .He is certainly a far more rounded player than the likes of Docherty and Barjonas and actually reminds me of a young Ian Ferguson.Certainly one we don't want to miss out on.
We did. Sold Danny Wilson to Liverpool for £5m in 2010Forrest is 28 - 21 in 2012. We should of had these lads coming through before that
We did. Sold Danny Wilson to Liverpool for £5m in 2010
It was like £2m no?We did. Sold Danny Wilson to Liverpool for £5m in 2010
£5m you still believe that ?
Cant believe ive seen this thread about 3 different times in the past few months despite it having such an obvious answer.
And that’s why Forrest and McGregor and Brown before them haven’t left Celtic , it’s their level.Even the players who left haven’t made much of themselves
It actually astonishes me this has to be explained to some people.We did. But we played Perry, Hegarty, Cole, Naismith, McMillan, McKay, MacLeod, Hutton, Little and others and the vast majority were found wanting.
Had we not lost the best of the youngsters we may have bore more fruit, but given the level of opposition I'm not sure.
Before admin, we had the likes of McGregor, Hutton, Adam, Fleck, Wylde and Ness having made a decent amount of first team appearances from our youth team. Hutton made us good money, McGregor certainly could have without everything that happened. We didn't get the best from Fleck, but we're seeing what he could have done.
They've had less pressure and a stable club to benefit from in recent years. Look at them now - Johnston has been bumped out the team because the pressure is on, and they loaned Henderson out rather than keeping and playing him. That's the norm.
Celtic have had a predominantly really shit record with their youth development over the years (lolz, no not just that)
Their previous wonder kids like Burchill, Donnelly etc - they were all shite.
I would say over about a 25 year period we utterly dick them in terms of the standard of youth player we have produced.
Don’t be silly you know that’s not true but like your staunchness
Us and the rims are absolutely miles ahead of everyone in Scottish football. Using pressure or needing to win games as an excuse is patheticWe did. But we played Perry, Hegarty, Cole, Naismith, McMillan, McKay, MacLeod, Hutton, Little and others and the vast majority were found wanting.
Had we not lost the best of the youngsters we may have bore more fruit, but given the level of opposition I'm not sure.
Before admin, we had the likes of McGregor, Hutton, Adam, Fleck, Wylde and Ness having made a decent amount of first team appearances from our youth team. Hutton made us good money, McGregor certainly could have without everything that happened. We didn't get the best from Fleck, but we're seeing what he could have done.
They've had less pressure and a stable club to benefit from in recent years. Look at them now - Johnston has been bumped out the team because the pressure is on, and they loaned Henderson out rather than keeping and playing him. That's the norm.
Who are you taking out of the team for McPake and Patterson at this stage of their development?Us and the rims are absolutely miles ahead of everyone in Scottish football. Using pressure or needing to win games as an excuse is pathetic
As was said in the other thread. Johnstone has started against us at Ibrox 3 times and has started a Scottish Cup Final. They started an 18 year old at Pittodrie last week and then against Hibs in the semi final.
Johnstone and Frimpong are a lot less physically developed than McPake and Patterson so there’s no reason for them not to be getting a chance. McPake and Patterson have more potential than both as well.
The idea that somehow pressure stops getting kids games is an excuse only our fans use.
Ehmm no, I do know that's true actually.
Tierney - aye great - Hutton achieved more, a large transfer fee means little without the games on the park - in context of fee inflation the fee involved actually isn't a kick in the arse of being comparable anyway, Hutton has been a far better performed at International level, Europe, England...
McGregor and Forrest, aye magic - couldn't dream of the football CV Adam and Ferguson have, Liverpool, European Finals etc over what it is the Celtic two have
Craig Beattie - never had the career of Ross McCormack, a regular mover in the Championship at a time Beattie was fatly rampaging around Hampden.
David Marshall - Alan McGregor has had the better career, a key performer in a side who made a European Final.
O Dea - was no Danny Wilson.
McGeady had now probably just about been outperformed by Fleck
I mean you you I didn't include Rocco Quinn, Ritchie Towell and Tony Ralston to be fair...
Celtic have a record of youth that isn't something worth shouting about.
see you take a keen interest in Celtic then batter on chief question still is when was last successful youth player
Do you haven inability to read because you are going on about a thing I didn't mention in a seeming attempt to weight praise ON Celtic.... when did was last produce a successful youth player isn't a statement i have made, questioned etc - so that isn't a question I was answering.
I used a 25 year period to show a wider spread of data and evidence to show our superior player development , you then questioned this - I provided supporting evidence for my statement, an interest in Celtic, no - but clearly I notice and mock players who play for them...yet you are still pushing back on the want for something nice to be said about Celtic and a negative re Rangers despite the statement I said validating neither of they ideas..
You used a 25 year period simply because it suited you to ensure it wasn’t detrimental to your staunchness our success in bringing through youth or at least giving them opportunities is embarrassing it’s really that straight forward no need to go back 25 year just go back from now to 15 year ago our success is abysmal compared to other SPL clubs
I used a wider spread of data to validate a claim rather than a smaller sample size yes, the notion that is staunch is fucken bizarre, and acting on the premise it is (which I'm not, the actuality is I don't give a %^*& and didn't think of it at this level of depth ) you are by your own logic conspicuously going out your way to be un-stuanch which is slightly odd you would feel you had to make that level of effort detail and care into what is chippy paper banter on the internet....
Us and the rims are absolutely miles ahead of everyone in Scottish football.
Patterson should’ve been given a chance the last couple of months while Tav has been horrendous. He should also be getting game time in the league and cup games that against shite teams that offer zero threat and we’re ahead by several goals even if you don’t think he’s worth the ‘risk’ of a start.Who are you taking out of the team for McPake and Patterson at this stage of their development?
Crazy talk.Patterson should’ve been given a chance the last couple of months while Tav has been horrendous. He should also be getting game time in the league and cup games that against shite teams that offer zero threat and we’re ahead by several goals even if you don’t think he’s worth the ‘risk’ of a start.
McPake should always be in the squad ahead of Barker, Jones, Stewart, Arfield when it comes to options for the front 3.
Patterson should’ve been given a chance the last couple of months while Tav has been horrendous. He should also be getting game time in the league and cup games that against shite teams that offer zero threat and we’re ahead by several goals even if you don’t think he’s worth the ‘risk’ of a start.
McPake should always be in the squad ahead of Barker, Jones, Stewart, Arfield when it comes to options for the front 3.
McPake hasn‘t more than an hour in any league game for Dundee this season. In fact, in their last 5 league games he has a total of 26 minutes coming on as a sub and has been an unused sub in three of those games.
Patterson should’ve been given a chance the last couple of months while Tav has been horrendous. He should also be getting game time in the league and cup games that against shite teams that offer zero threat and we’re ahead by several goals even if you don’t think he’s worth the ‘risk’ of a start.
McPake should always be in the squad ahead of Barker, Jones, Stewart, Arfield when it comes to options for the front 3.
Come on, this is nonsense and advocating change for the sake of it. Neither Patterson nor McPake are ready to play domestically, never mind in Europe.
It’s also the amount of money it costs to run the academy - I read that the other lot spend £4 million per year meaning that if you include Tierney and McGeady they’ll only have broken even over the 10 years since they built Lennoxtown. Although they also have other first team players(currently)
Over the same period with Murray Park/The Hummel Training Centre we have potentially lost £30/£40 million.
A lot of teams in England have disbanded their academies for this very reason.
There’s no point doing it for the sake of it/to be stubborn.
Patterson’s playing in Europe tonight