Axelrod
Well-Known Member
I think if the club were smart they should offer that type of deal.
They would if they had any intention whatsoever of having a singing section or implementing safe standing .
Hearing stuff like “ it won’t be next season , it’s just too early “ for a move to BF3 to bears who haven’t been monitoring the UB may think that sounds fair enough .
I have been watching and listening and the union bears have been hearing the same guff from the club for twelve years . It’s always “ not this season “ fobbed off and now they are realising they are being led by the nose .
Again already we have our SLO on here managing expectations by saying “ safe standing isn’t off the table BUT IT WONT BE NEXT season and perhaps not even the following season “ I mean it’s little wonder people get fed up with that kind of answer , as if putting safe standing in is some sort of revolutionary and difficult task that no other club has managed . That’s not a dig at the SLO as he is at least coming on here and telling people the club stance on it , which is an improvement on before if nothing else . I bet you anything you want it’s not his preference either but he can’t and won’t come out against the board here not a chance .
People won’t be fobbed off any more by bullshit , everyone knows safe standing CAN be implemented quickly , is not expensive , various models across Europe can be used .
I’d have more respect for the club if they just come out and admit they DO NOT WANT the union bears , they do not want a singing section and they certainly can’t be arsed with safe standing . Just tell the truth and stop trying to kid people on and muck them about for once .
Last edited: