BrownBrogues
Well-Known Member
The other shirt is for Helander, Katic and Edmundson to fight over. Big Connor is the back line leader?
Dam right
Dam right
Thought Edmundson was decent again today
I wouldnt rush into a judgement when theres no need and also Helander is clearly not ready , good bit to come - i hope.
would rather have katic than goldson
Goldson first pick absolutely, his partner? I like Katic...he should probably be partnering him but the money paid for helander would suggest that he's likely to start.The other shirt is for Helander, Katic and Edmundson to fight over. Big Connor is the back line leader?
Dam right
It’s going to be him and Helander
I can’t understand some of the negative posts about him on here at times.
He’s my 1st choice every time.
So based on 20 minutes of helander you think He has done enough to clearly make the position his?It'll be Goldson & Helander.
I really don't think there's even a slight doubt in Gerrard's mind about that at the moment.
So based on 20 minutes of helander you think He has done enough to clearly make the position his?
Goldson has looked really fit and sharp since pre-season so he has to be first pick for me.
Nah Katic looks over at Goldson all the time for instruction. He’s still got positioning work to do, a fully fit Goldson is our best CB.
would rather have katic than goldson
Edmundson and Helander for me
Just cause we spent the cash doesnt mean they go in to tbe first team. You are right about grezda as an example and also borna. We spend money to improve the squad. High transfer fee shouldnt dictate who gets a starting placeWe didn't pay that type of cash for squad back up.......he was bought to be a cert starter....of course I could quote you Grezda but in theory we aren't spending that type of cash other than to improve on what we have.
Not a fair judgement point - gaffer May have said goldson is the lead, listen to him hence he looks as opposed to being nervy or anything else.
However if that is the instruction then it shows goldson is the stronger I’m the gaffers eyes
I can’t understand some of the negative posts about him on here at times.
He’s my 1st choice every time.
I wouldnt rush into a judgement when theres no need and also Helander is clearly not ready , good bit to come - i hope.
I think when he plays his best Katic is better but Goldson is much more consistent over a season so it has to be him.Some folk have a weird love thing for Katic so can’t see that Goldson is the better player so have a go at him to try and prove their already wrong opinion
I like Katic but Goldson is the better of the 2 currently.
Just cause we spent the cash doesnt mean they go in to tbe first team. You are right about grezda as an example and also borna. We spend money to improve the squad. High transfer fee shouldnt dictate who gets a starting place
If we spent 5m on a striker tommorow does that mean alfie is 2nd choice or does it mean we have good squad options
I like Katic but he is very overrated on here and has plenty to improve I thought Edmundson was the best centre half on show today by his performance it will be Goldson and Edmundson until Helander is fit
I've watched Goldson closely and I'm sure he will be first pick but not for me, his distribution is not the best and will cost us when under pressure, just my opinion.Yes goldson plus another for me to
Absolutely, I don’t think it’s even up for debate. It’s up to the others to either up their game or for one of them to go on a bad run of form.It'll be Goldson & Helander.
I really don't think there's even a slight doubt in Gerrard's mind about that at the moment.
No.So based on 20 minutes of helander you think He has done enough to clearly make the position his?
I think assuming because we paid a relatively large fee for a player means he will start is incorrect. We have four centre backs and all four should have the same opportunityWell who within our defence is valued at more than Helander? Katic clearly remains doubtful to some of us and indeed the manager albeit he maybe had personal issues last year.
The absolute argument on a 5M striker is that's worth between a third and quarter of Alfie's value.
You are right a big fee guarantees nothing but you spend in relative terms and we didn't pay that for this lad to be back up-we bought him to improve the starting defence....not the squad.
We've seen under SG quite rightly he will drop players irrespective of cost but the point remains the same.