I think the majority of refs are not intentionally dishonest. I except Clancy from that statement. But years of intimidation of referees by that shower mean that in the event of a split second game changing 50 50 decision, the chances are they will give it in their favour. It’s the easy route, saves them from vitriolic criticism afterwards.
Those Duffy and McGregor non-decisions by Collum yesterday. Is there something in their minds which says, “I’ve already given a few key (albeit correct) decisions against them, so I can’t realistically give any more?”. Again, years of chip chip chip intimidation have led us to this place. Lennons utterly dishonest comments yesterday will help keep Collum in his place for next time. Chipping away.