Speminalium8
Well-Known Member
Can he be cited? Their McGregor said Clancy said he saw it and thought it wasn’t intentional. Is it not only for cases where the ref missed it?
AgreeClancy said he saw nothing in it and it was accidental. He saw the incident and chose not to act.
We know this because the w@nkers on sky had the brass neck to ask the Hivs Captain about Alfie...thats fuckin disgraceful.
McGregor then contradicts himself by saying,"you know where you're putting you're feet".
If that's the case he should have walked for stamping on Kamara!!
Grigo, you are a very respected poster. If not a stamp, what was it?
Here's a few talking points.
Those that say Alf knew what he was doing would have to accept that Porteous knows what he's doing when he goes all in on a tackle and McGregor knows he's going to stamp on Kamara.
I'd say Porteous should have been red carded in 20 seconds. He missed Alf, trying to go over the ball.
Andy wanker initially thought yellow. Then minutes realized he could say red and aid the momentum for a retro red.even Clancy says it wasn't intentional , Porteous and his team mates made little or nothing of it , Andy Wanker thought it was red ,so surely that tells you something...?
I don’t take my opinions from Andy Walker thank you.even Clancy says it wasn't intentional , Porteous and his team mates made little or nothing of it , Andy Wanker thought it was red ,so surely that tells you something...?
It was all night and then someI saw 5 minutes on sky when my RTV was down, they mentioned it at least 7 times
Stuart, he put no pressure on that.
And as his weight came on as he fell, he turned his boot.
To me, a stamp includes the use of force.
He’s trod on the guy, it’s only a stamp if you watch it in slow motion and imagine it had much more force than it clearly did in real time.
Ludicrous overreaction.
Couldn't agree more. The McGregor incident was completely different. Yes Crocker is a fanny but that's missing the point. Morelos should have known better and if he gets cited then for me he deserves it.
Say all you want about the compliance issue but if he doesn't do it then there is no case to answer
If he stamped the boy would not have been able to continue.
I make you right G.
Remember thinking at the time that it was a shocker from Porteous.perfect answer
Watch it again at full speed. Hes clearly trying to trap the ball thats under his foot.Grigo, you are a very respected poster. If not a stamp, what was it?
It never happened!It’s as if the McGregor stamp on Kamara never happened.
Yes, I think we were lucky that Alfie never got punished..
But Sky’s obsession on Alfie is now sinister.
I see what you did there. Comedy gold.I've read some shite on here in the past but your post takes the biscuit
I don’t take my opinions from Andy Walker thank you.
Intention doesn’t come into it. Clearly Clancy thought there wasn't enough for serious foul play but I think he will change his mind when he sees it again.
Oh they were straight in with the "you can't call it a stamp" defence at the replay, utter cretins.Notice the immediate difference in reaction to the McGregor stamp on Kamara? As clear as day for anyone watching.
I hope Gerrard defends Alfie!
Fair enough. I believe different.Stuart, he put no pressure on that.
And as his weight came on as he fell, he turned his boot.
To me, a stamp includes the use of force.
t wasn’t even a stamp ffs, tangle of legs. No worse or better than McGregor.It’s absolutely outrageous! I’ve been one of Morelos’ biggest critics for this side of his game but there was nothing in that tonight!
If that’s Kamara/Davis - it doesn’t get a second thought!
I don’t take my opinions from Andy Walker thank you.
Intention doesn’t come into it. Clearly Clancy thought there wasn't enough for serious fo
l play but I think he will change his mind when he sees it again.
I don’t take my opinions from Andy Walker thank you.
Intention doesn’t come into it. Clearly Clancy thought there wasn't enough for serious foul play but I think he will change his mind when he sees it again.
Fair enough. I believe different.
Morelos is and has been for a while, to us, a victim of suspect decisions and treatment. However on this isolated incident, I think he lashed out and allowed previous indiscretions to get the better of him.
I have no issue about Sky Sports making a headline. It is their job and we have provided the opportunity.
I have it on good authority that will be reported to the Compliance Officer!Jack Ross’s jacket looks a few sizes too big.
In fact I would say it is massive!
Thats not the point mate. Other players ‘put themselves in that position’ and nothing is said. The question is who decides what ‘the position’ Is?It won’t go down well but he put himself in that position! They will lap it up but ultimately Alfie is at fault and WILL be banned! Only good thing is we have players now who’ll step up and do the job.
I don’t take my opinions from Andy Walker thank you.
Intention doesn’t come into it. Clearly Clancy thought there wasn't enough for serious fo
l play but I think he will change his mind when he sees it again.
Happy.Stuart, I’m not going to argue he wasn’t a bloody idiot, but I genuinely didn’t think it was serious foul play. Doesn’t that include excessive force mate ?
I do also disagree about Sky. That wasn’t even the dirtiest foul in the match. To me, both McGregor standing on Glen & Oorteous dragging his studs on Jack’s shin were dirtier.
I respect if you want to disagree. I’m sure others will.
What was Jack Ross talking about, something happened in the last fixture with one of his players but didn’t want to get involved on the touch line?
Can’t remember anything about this.
Happy.
I appreciate you thoughts.
Bed time for me, good night good sir.