macaloon9
Well-Known Member
It’s always poor but today was just downright bizarre.This post match analysis is brutal.
Basically, they were amazing, should have had a penalty and did I say, they were amazing.
It was a shitey 1-1 draw.
It’s always poor but today was just downright bizarre.This post match analysis is brutal.
Basically, they were amazing, should have had a penalty and did I say, they were amazing.
It was a shitey 1-1 draw.
McCoist doesn't really push the Rangers perspective, trying too hard to be neutral.
Boyd fighting a lone fight v about 5 of them.
Boyd was the most vocal.Pretty sure McCoist was the most vocal of anyone that it wasn’t a penalty.
Sound mate.I don’t really care why she has no objectivity, no impartiality and honesty. All I care about is that she does not.
She was fcuking disgrace in leading the campaign to get Alfie cited, literally pleading for the CO to act several times at HT and FT
She is a terrible presenter. She is a biased cnut. And she can go and fcuk herself. She is every bit as bad as Crocker and Walker.
Emma Dodds puts her to shame
Aha, the old ghost penalty.despite the fact there was no contact it was still a penalty
Aye Santa Claus exists as well. Two blokes in our Lapland office used to look after his reindeer when he went on holiday and they confirmed it.She actually does, some of the people from our Perth office at work grew up with her and are Saints fans have confirmed it.
Honestly got no idea mate.i agree with what you're saying though. I've not listened to enough of the sky coverage to have an opinion on her. Only formed on knowing her and knowing she's not a bitter sort.but why would you be nervous round wibble if you are a St Johnstone fan?
if you are a Celtic fan, you might have idolised him for what he did, until McLeish pulled it all down. Plenty of journalists do the old "I'm a Partick/Airdrie etc fan", her face after so many games this season tells me she doesn't like us
No Tailwind. Some would like to pump her - there's a big differenceShe was a major player in the concerted campaign to get Alfie cited and is a massive, massive cnut, as proved again today.
Some on here like her though. Strange. Very strange.
Boyd was the most vocal.
McCoist lauded Rodgers Celtic.
Was gobsmacked that Turnbull wasn’t picked for Scotland.
Was happy to play the role of the butt of Walker and Barbour’s jokes
Amongst others.
I know some people want McCoist to be 100% neutral, but I don’t agree with this. It’s like the token bears on Clyde etc, who are there just to give broadcasts a suggestion of objectivity. The mentally challengeds are biased as %^*&. The bears are neutral. So the overall impression given by these shows is a massively pro mentally challenged look, dressed up as “neutral” as there is a bear in the team. But he’s not allowed to actually give pro bear views.
So you have 5 mentally challenged views.
1 neutral view
1 Rangers view
The slant of the programme is massively the mentally challenged view. But they pretend it’s even because there is a token bear or two for show.
In these scenarios, the way you get an overall ”neutral” or objective programme is for the bears to be every bit as biased in our favour as they are in theirs, so they sort of balance out.
So, I don’t want McCoist to be straight down the line. He doesn’t need to be ridiculous like the mentally challengeds either. But all the arse kissing of Rodgers, Turnbull, etc. Just leave it out. Don’t mention it at all.
Cool, If they’re still in touch with him can you get them to ask why I never received Optimus Prime for Christmas back in 1984 please.Aye Santa Claus exists as well. Two blokes in our Lapland office used to look after his reindeer when he went on holiday and they confirmed it.
Not that any of it matters but Walker was saying it WAS a penalty. The wee lesbo phrased it that it was 2-1 but made it sound like 2-1 in favour of it being a penalty. Straight away Walker said that's 3-1 then.Why was Boyd any more vocal than McCoist about the penalty? The thread is pretty embarrassing as has been said it was 4-1 that it wasn’t a penalty.
Wibble was the only one saying it was and he was pretty incoherent and taking pish most of the program anyway.
Just got back to me. He said he gave you an Ally McCoist hat-trick in the League Cup Final that year instead? Says would you like to go back and swap?Cool, If they’re still in touch with him can you get them to ask why I never received Optimus Prime for Christmas back in 1984 please.
Not that any of it matters but Walker was saying it WAS a penalty. The wee lesbo phrased it that it was 2-1 but made it sound like 2-1 in favour of it being a penalty. Straight away Walker said that's 3-1 then.
I read all that - it's not the way it looked to me.See post #106. Walker said during commentary it wasn’t Barbour said she was withdrawing her view so it was 2-1, Walker then said 3-1 and then they went to McCoist who laughed and said never a penalty in a million years.
I read all that - it's not the way it looked to me.
Na. I’m gonna complain to Sky about her bias again, I hate her and her agendaSound mate.
Didn't come on the thread.to argue, was just to make the point she's not a mentally challenged.
Away and look at the league table, open another can and calm down
Aye, sad that a bitter, mentally challenged agenda promoting boot gets a free ride off so many in her because they think she is attractive. She’s barely even average at best. And that would be no defence anyway. A guy behaving as she does would get it both barrels. CooNo Tailwind. Some would like to pump her - there's a big difference
A complete timmy love in - f*ck off!!
Sums it up perfectly.She’s a cow.
also let’s not forget Chris McLaughlin turned her gay
This is not true.Why was Boyd any more vocal than McCoist about the penalty? The thread is pretty embarrassing as has been said it was 4-1 that it wasn’t a penalty.
Wibble was the only one saying it was and he was pretty incoherent and taking pish most of the program anyway.
Did McCoist not say “no penalty”?McCoist doesn't really push the Rangers perspective, trying too hard to be neutral.
Boyd fighting a lone fight v about 5 of them.
These 2 things are both true.Did McCoist not say “no penalty”?
As a pundit, he’s there to give an analysis of the game and perhaps educate the layman on tactics and in play situations.Gonna defend McCoist a wee bit here.
Don't think there is anything wrong with trying to call it down the middle. He should be as a pundit. I don't want cheerleaders like that lot have. Just want fair analysis.
Sorry to say this but McCoist has really annoyed me this season and I know saying that won’t be popular with many. Over the season he’s been very critical of Morelos and has failed to defend him when Alfie has been criticised wrongly in many instances by people like Crocker and Walker.Boyd was the most vocal.
McCoist lauded Rodgers Celtic.
Was gobsmacked that Turnbull wasn’t picked for Scotland.
Was happy to play the role of the butt of Walker and Barbour’s jokes
Amongst others.
I know some people want McCoist to be 100% neutral, but I don’t agree with this. It’s like the token bears on Clyde etc, who are there just to give broadcasts a suggestion of objectivity. The mentally challengeds are biased as %^*&. The bears are neutral. So the overall impression given by these shows is a massively pro mentally challenged look, dressed up as “neutral” as there is a bear in the team. But he’s not allowed to actually give pro bear views.
So you have 5 mentally challenged views.
1 neutral view
1 Rangers view
The slant of the programme is massively the mentally challenged view. But they pretend it’s even because there is a token bear or two for show.
In these scenarios, the way you get an overall ”neutral” or objective programme is for the bears to be every bit as biased in our favour as they are in theirs, so they sort of balance out.
So, I don’t want McCoist to be straight down the line. He doesn’t need to be ridiculous like the mentally challengeds either. But all the arse kissing of Rodgers, Turnbull, etc. Just leave it out. Don’t mention it at all.
...and the diving kunt should have had a second yellow in the second half for his theatrics.Never a penalty and correctly given a yellow card.
This is not true.
In real time and the initial replays Walker was trying to invent contact.
Barbour was pushing for being a pen during half time.
I would say lying about what people said, that would have been clearly observed by thousands, is more embarrassing than someone starting a thread pointing out the ridiculous stance taken by these pundits. I turned over to a different source on full time. No way I was listening to Sky at full time given their bs up until then and throughout this season.
Barbour, Walker and O’Neill all argued for the pen at different points. I would say it is embarrassing for you attack other bears for pointing this out in your defence of mentally challenged minded scrotes.
I saw and heard what she clearly did say at HT.So you turned over and didn’t see it. Fair enough.
I saw and heard what she clearly did say at HT.
I saw what Walker clearly said at the time and in the subsequent.
I heard ONeills comments at half time.
I find your unwillingness to accept that what they said was clearly wrong is embarrassing (a term you used at fans on here and I throw back at you) as you then used it to attack fellow Rangers fans for starting a thread on a discussion board about their obvious and indefensible bias.
I am commenting directly on things I did see and hear. Why are you pretending these things were not said? It was actually broadcast live on tv and seen and heard by every fan on here who watched on Sky.
So nothing “fair enough” about your posts.
Can I ask, like the other guy, is she a friend/acquaintance of yours? Would explain your deliberate obfuscation of the situation.
I’ll make this easy for you as you are deliberately ignoring very clear points I have made through out.It was clear as day after the match when they discussed the penalty that it was 4-1 in favour of it not being a penalty. It is embarrassing to say otherwise.
In terms of Barbour I thought she was poor and tried to make a debate out of something that Boyd and McFadden weren’t having. O’Neill wasn’t competent enough to put forward an argument and seemed to say it was because he wasn’t going to agree with Boyd.
She’s a cow.
also let’s not forget Chris McLaughlin turned her gay
Whatever keeps you warm at night mateNa. I’m gonna complain to Sky about her bias again, I hate her and her agenda
She has not honesty, integrity and decency. She should be called out for it.Whatever keeps you warm at night mate
Of courseShe has not honesty, integrity and decency. She should be called out for it.
Shame you dont keep better company
She's a coo with an agenda.Of course
I'l be putting my house on the market in the morning because an angry man on an Internet forum who's had far too many cans and lost all touch with reality told me.
That is an interesting comment about Tanner.Honestly got no idea mate.i agree with what you're saying though. I've not listened to enough of the sky coverage to have an opinion on her. Only formed on knowing her and knowing she's not a bitter sort.
Whether that's being led by producers on sky or not, is probably a wider issue and a big part of why Tanner wanted out from sky as he felt their coverage of Celtic was becoming excessive.
I like McFadden, I think he quite fair.When a poet like McFadden is admitting it was a dive, I think that sums up her contribution.
Wee fùcking weirdo.
Dunkeld.Perth
I’ll make this easy for you as you are deliberately ignoring very clear points I have made through out.
1. At HT did Barbour try and indicate it was a penalty, despite the fact sky have broadcast video showing their was clearly no contact?
2. Did Walker at the time of the incident and in the immediate replays try and indicate it should be a penalty despite the video images clearly showing no contact?
3. Do you have a personal friendship, acquaintance or other reasons for refusing to admit what Barbour dI’d at HT and pretending that at times during the broadcast Walker and Barbour in addition to O’Neill tried to cast doubt on the dive and the yellow card?