The problem this country has in respect of what you think, is that they will “accidentally or mistakenly” mention aspects of the allegations or other factors that a half decent QC will argue is prejudicial. The burden of proof in criminal trials is above 90% towards guilt. Anything that hints at external influence of jury decision will be an open goal for a QC. Tragically for the victim, they then need to almost go it alone.
In the civil cases, the burden of proof is a lot less in that it’s balance of probability, 51% that it happened, by that stage, common knowledge of the situation and circumstances known by others, isn’t as essential to secure a victory. That’s when the publicity is potentially more beneficial.