Big Joe Canoe
Well-Known Member
By f*ck that is one ugly c*nt
By f*ck that is one ugly c*nt
Not even the deviants in the lounge would watch that.So eh.....
Anyone have the vid?
Best reply of the night I wish to fk people would take this on board.That's what got us into this mess, meet them head on and there is always only one winner
and named it francis after the pope,It must be exhausting to be that consumed by hate. She has a kid now as well I'm sure. Who could be fecked with it?
Rather than fight this fire with fire kill it in a vacuum of insignificance. She is provided a platform due to shitstiring up a storm then making it rain with the victim cards when receiving the responses she is looking for1. Personal insults against this woman do nothing for our cause of “parity”, we just want equal treatment, regardless of our religious, political, or sports background.
2. While I applaud the OP’s initial intention, to draw attention to her attention seeking pish, we probably just gave her a lot more hits than the five or six bhigot hits she would have normally received. I think we can point out her agenda without the hits, in my opinion.
She refuses to debate with anyone who questions her, and counters her sectarian accusations. So in my mind she brings it on herself which I believe she wants.1. Personal insults against this woman do nothing for our cause of “parity”, we just want equal treatment, regardless of our religious, political, or sports background.
2. While I applaud the OP’s initial intention, to draw attention to her attention seeking pish, we probably just gave her a lot more hits than the five or six bhigot hits she would have normally received. I think we can point out her agenda without the hits, in my opinion.
You won’t start an argument that way.What a hideous looking woman.
We all know what she is. My point is we can’t report people for abuse, sectarian or otherwise, while slaughtering her for the way she looks. We need to box clever.She refuses to debate with anyone who questions her, and counters her sectarian accusations. So in my mind she brings it on herself which I believe she wants.
She doesn’t have the tool required to debate anything. You know like actual facts, firm foundations on which you standpoint is based, a balanced outlook and the ability to counter the other parties point of view.She refuses to debate with anyone who questions her, and counters her sectarian accusations. So in my mind she brings it on herself which I believe she wants.
There will be a journalist that you've never heard of sill say "apparently". As a politician says, I can't recall .Ha ha, surely no
Id like to present to the jury, I just find her accent absolutely fucking hilarious. Ive said nothing about her appearance m'lawd lolWe all know what she is. My point is we can’t report people for abuse, sectarian or otherwise, while slaughtering her for the way she looks. We need to box clever.
Correct.It’s becoming more apparent, as with many like her, that it’s not the football team we support but it’s our Britishness that grates them.
Yes he will.You won’t start an argument that way.
Go for it. At least you'll still be a free man when we win the ten.If I say what I think about her, it will get brought up 10 year from now and I'll get 4 year in Addiewell.
Aye we wouldNot even the deviants in the lounge would watch that.
Exactly why we should not engage in name calling and vindictiveness, Debate yes, but no need to be drawn to her level which she is desperate for us to do.She refuses to debate with anyone who questions her, and counters her sectarian accusations. So in my mind she brings it on herself which I believe she wants.
I can only hope, we can find demons in her closet then we can shut her up.We all know what she is. My point is we can’t report people for abuse, sectarian or otherwise, while slaughtering her for the way she looks. We need to box clever.
Any narA pro Protestant one apparently.
She's as Irish as I am, and I doubt she is regular attendee at Mass.
So why does she claim to be an Irish Catholic?
To call the marches this coming weekend anti catholic marches is in itself offensive .Surely in the past she has tweeted some offensive stuff online ?
The smug tone gives me the boak. Thinks she’s smart when she’s only getting roles and guest slots on TV due to her pals in the mhedia
If any evidence exists it needs used and maybe she will regret it
Being British is sectarian in her and others like hers eyes.Correct.
That's what I was thinking...another falicy they 've invented to suit their agenda . The walks or marches are not Anti - Catholic as they would have you or anyone believe , but a celebration .... She should be called out for telling lies and for intentionally misleading people .Anti-Catholic marches?
Oh please no sir the smellShe's foaming at the gash awaiting a reaction to this
Reported. Takes a second. The more that do it the more chance her hate speech is removed.
1) What on earth is she on about?
2) Sounds like she’s inflaming a situation that doesn’t exist
3) I had no idea she spoke with a Glasgow uni accent
While you are correct the problem is that this non entity is provided a platform on Scottish main stream media and has the ear of the Scottish assembly.More posters have contributed to this thread than have shown interest in supporting call it outs of late
Each tweet they put out has about 10-15 likes. They are a non entity
It’s like someone is trying to binge watch all episodes of “to catch a predator” in record time.
you couldn't get a pretty more stereotypical looking group of tramp fans if you tried
The Hag is the f'n demon !I can only hope, we can find demons in her closet then we can shut her up.
Makes sense,she's obviously the face of it with others in the background directing matters,i.e. Dornan.If anyone has any experience on how campaign groups and charities are supposed to work:
Does Call It Out need to be registered? It doesn't seem to be registered as a charity, which I suppose isn't illegal unless they're receiving large donations or something.
But is there a point at which they need to be registered in some way as a group that is seeking to influence and shape the political agenda?
I discovered the Scottish Government's rules on Registered Lobbying, which seems like an attempt to enforce transparency about how lobbyists interact with MSPs and Ministers. There's a searchable public register, and lobbyists are obliged to report face-to-face meetings with MSPs and explain the purpose of the meeting.
https://www.lobbying.scot/SPS/LobbyingRegister/SearchLobbyingRegister
Call It Out has clearly been lobbying MSPs to adopt language like "anti-Irish racism" in a bid to change the narrative and frame religious sectarianism as coming from one side only. This would seem to potentially fit the definition of activity that should be reported under the Registered Lobbying rules.
I searched the Register above to find out which organisations have lobbied James Dornan. One meeting with Nil by Mouth in 2018 was the only registered event related to football.
There are a couple of exclusions that may apply in this case 1. If no face to face meetings were held. (Unclear if virtual = face to face, but seems like it should count) 2. If the "lobbyist" was not paid.
1. It seems known fact that Haggerty met with Dornan and other MSPs virtually. See below from FF. https://www.followfollow.com/forum/...o-anti-catholic-and-anti-irish-racism.176329/
2. This seems like the most likely get-out for Haggerty. I'm guessing Haggerty is the face of Call It Out, but that she doesn't take any income from the organisation, and so might not be obliged to report meetings with the likes of James Dornan. But her lobbying interest is clearly significantly more than that of a constituent showing up at a surgery to make their feelings known on an issue or ask for help.
Maybe there's nothing to this, it just all seems a bit of a grey area that this woman is building a platform to influence the political agenda while her "campaign" is really just a website that doesn't seem to operate on the same basis as other campaign groups (Nil by Mouth is a registered charity).
It's what they doThis women is unhinged and has some serious issues.
She is craving victimhood and faux offense.
Sandy Matheson appears to be a talking pussy
you couldn't get a pretty more stereotypical looking group of tramp fans if you tried
You're going to make a lot of friends here. Also, not that I'm entirely convinced you aren't it, if a Catholic march went by my house I wouldn't give a %^*&. As it stands, I couldn't give a single %^*& about the OO marching by either - but that's ambivalence rather than the weird hatred that people seem to have for it. I would love it if both sides could have that attitude personally.That’s the first time I’ve watched footage of her or heard her voice. I don’t know what you guys are talking about, she’s alright looking, aside from the obnoxious smirk.
I know I’m going to get a shit ton of abuse for this, but I take it reviewing the situation in regards our walks is out of the question? I can kinda see the point here, if a Catholic march went past my house, as an atheist I’d be raging too.