Are you once again using the odd call which goes our way to prove theres no cheating.... while on every thread about hundreds of decisions that go against us you keep telling us we can rule out bias as there is no evidence, it has to be down to the quite dreadful standard of refereeing its just bad luck. Its the kind of argument id expect to hear on sportsound or superscoreboard im starting to think you do not understand how daft it is.
1 call going our way= excellent refereeing, honesty and integrity, proves he cannot of cheated at any point in his career or given a dishonest decision even due to fear or pressure from the media.
101 calls going against us= poor standard, blind, daft, crap training, poor fitness, just honest mistakes, worst refs in the world.
Il bet you are still saying they are terrible refs next season too, and the next season and the next one. Im sure you have said the refs are dreadful all your life and have never felt the standard was any good.
If you are such a big fan of Clancy or a supporter of match officials, and i agree there is far too much focus on this one referee when loads of them are cheating, why did you and one or two others not defend him after the old firm game when the Rangers management called him a cheat and every single post on here suggested he was at it ? why wait a year ?