Hullo hullo we are the Rangers boys.
Hullo hullo you’ll know us by our noise
We’re up to our knees in Celtic blood
Surrender or you’ll die.
No different to killie, hearts or Dundee.
It’s not hard is it.
Why do you think I take what I sing from the union bears . Wee boys who most weren’t even born during our greatest achievements. To me a 19th Century Terrorist is a 19th Century Terrorist , call a spade a spade . Clarke is a bitter wee shite . I said so when he first came to Kilmarnock and a lot of people on here said “ no he’s not bad , he’s ok “. I’ll stick my neck out and say I expect him to be the scum gaffer sooner than later .All you need to start this is the Union bears get them to singing from the same song sheet and the rest of Ibrox would follow
That’s a different song my friend. U still also mention them too.I’d rather not have their name in any of our songs, or jobby sands for that matter, but;
We hate celtic peado bast@rds couldn’t be more bang on the money.
What about up to our knees in fhilthy blood.I’d rather not have their name in any of our songs, or jobby sands for that matter, but;
We hate celtic peado bast@rds couldn’t be more bang on the money.
Up to our knees in greenyin blood has a nice ring to it.
Aye legitimising our equivalent to 19th Century Terrorist is exactly what we should do.We hate celtic, green hun bastards.
Up to our knees in green hun blood.
Syllables fit. Takes ownership back of hun term to be used against them as it originally used to be. And since media widely accepts their hun explanation of being just 'enemy' they wouldn't be able to go after us on it without properly redifining it's meaning as sectarian and needing to going after them for using it as well.
Would confuse the shit out of mentally challengeds too.
Win win.
We hate celtic cuntish bastards. Got a ring to it.
Works for me.
Singing sad Celtic bastard to Stevie Clarke would wind him right up.
They would find something to ban it
We hate celtic cuntish bastards. Got a ring to it. Works for me.
You can’t call a beggar Sad ffs.Cheer up Alky Clarke
Oh what can it mean
Your a sad begghar bastard
With a shite football team
We're up to our knees in c*nt blood
Aye legitimising our equivalent to 19th Century Terrorist is exactly what we should do.
Over complicating it just sing Celtic instead of 19th Century Terrorist.
No comebacks
Not sectarian
So rather than fight for what’s right we just give up? You can’t go on about hypocrites while at the same time calling people huns and also highlighting it as a sectarian insult. That would be slightly hypocritical as well as muddying the waters.Aye, because as things stand they are seen as equivalent and the mentally challengeds really get hammered for it eh?
And if that was how things worked, them proudly calling themselves 19th Century Terrorists would legitimise our use of the word to describe them?
For what it's worth, I couldn't give a %^*& what they sing. And I also think we should sing whatever we like too. It's the uneven, hypocrital, faux outrage bullshit generated from the other side last decade plus as a means to berate us and paint us as the sole perpetrators of 'sectarianism' and 'bigotry', while they are the sole victims, that's the real issue.
Won’t fit the songWe're up to our knees in c*nt blood
The word 19th Century Terrorist means Irish Republican and is political not sectarian. But the narrative here is too far down the road, those who feign offence have got the law, the media and generally accepted public opinion on their side. While I hate the thought of us having to change to suit our enemies, it's obvious we have to or the club we love will end up suffering.
I've read a few times over the years we just change the word 19th Century Terrorist to the word Celtic and the same songs with the same sentiments become untouchable. Celtic are the very embodiment of 19th Century Terroristism in Scotland, but they are just the name of a football club. If Killie fans can be up to their knees in Ayr blood then we must be allowed to be up to ours in Celtic blood. If cheer up to a sad Dundee bastard is acceptable, so must a Celtic one.
It becomes football club rivalry and not religious or political. Even if we mean the same thing.
Could we do that? Should we do it? Are the words so embedded they could never change to the majority? Or would a campaign to do this have a chance?
The subject comes up from time to time and as of yet there has be no genuine alternative acceptable version at least none that the club,club 1872 or even the B.O.has came out and given their full backing to.
Sad alky bastard would have hit the mark with less headlines and baggageSinging sad Celtic bastard to Stevie Clarke would wind him right up.
Do it. Best noise in world footballWe have a winner!!!
Agree 100% mate. Over the years they've systematically worked the media by highlighting 'sectarian' singing at our matches, and have played a blinder to be fair.Aye, because as things stand they are seen as equivalent and the mentally challengeds really get hammered for it eh?
And if that was how things worked, them proudly calling themselves 19th Century Terrorists would legitimise our use of the word to describe them?
For what it's worth, I couldn't give a %^*& what they sing. And I also think we should sing whatever we like too. It's the uneven, hypocrital, faux outrage bullshit generated from the other side last decade plus as a means to berate us and paint us as the sole perpetrators of 'sectarianism' and 'bigotry', while they are the sole victims, that's the real issue.
Same as Rangers means protestant,fcuk themThen they'll start a campaign that Celtic means catholic and their laptogs in the media will further that agenda.
Sad lying bastard would be more apporpriateSinging sad Celtic bastard to Stevie Clarke would wind him right up.
You’d think!The word 19th Century Terrorist means Irish Republican and is political not sectarian. But the narrative here is too far down the road, those who feign offence have got the law, the media and generally accepted public opinion on their side. While I hate the thought of us having to change to suit our enemies, it's obvious we have to or the club we love will end up suffering.
I've read a few times over the years we just change the word 19th Century Terrorist to the word Celtic and the same songs with the same sentiments become untouchable. Celtic are the very embodiment of 19th Century Terroristism in Scotland, but they are just the name of a football club. If Killie fans can be up to their knees in Ayr blood then we must be allowed to be up to ours in Celtic blood. If cheer up to a sad Dundee bastard is acceptable, so must a Celtic one.
It becomes football club rivalry and not religious or political. Even if we mean the same thing.
Could we do that? Should we do it? Are the words so embedded they could never change to the majority? Or would a campaign to do this have a chance?
Won’t fit the song
or how about "Timmy's Blood"The word 19th Century Terrorist means Irish Republican and is political not sectarian. But the narrative here is too far down the road, those who feign offence have got the law, the media and generally accepted public opinion on their side. While I hate the thought of us having to change to suit our enemies, it's obvious we have to or the club we love will end up suffering.
I've read a few times over the years we just change the word 19th Century Terrorist to the word Celtic and the same songs with the same sentiments become untouchable. Celtic are the very embodiment of 19th Century Terroristism in Scotland, but they are just the name of a football club. If Killie fans can be up to their knees in Ayr blood then we must be allowed to be up to ours in Celtic blood. If cheer up to a sad Dundee bastard is acceptable, so must a Celtic one.
It becomes football club rivalry and not religious or political. Even if we mean the same thing.
Could we do that? Should we do it? Are the words so embedded they could never change to the majority? Or would a campaign to do this have a chance?
The word 19th Century Terrorist means Irish Republican and is political not sectarian. But the narrative here is too far down the road, those who feign offence have got the law, the media and generally accepted public opinion on their side. While I hate the thought of us having to change to suit our enemies, it's obvious we have to or the club we love will end up suffering.
I've read a few times over the years we just change the word 19th Century Terrorist to the word Celtic and the same songs with the same sentiments become untouchable. Celtic are the very embodiment of 19th Century Terroristism in Scotland, but they are just the name of a football club. If Killie fans can be up to their knees in Ayr blood then we must be allowed to be up to ours in Celtic blood. If cheer up to a sad Dundee bastard is acceptable, so must a Celtic one.
It becomes football club rivalry and not religious or political. Even if we mean the same thing.
Could we do that? Should we do it? Are the words so embedded they could never change to the majority? Or would a campaign to do this have a chance?
The club could really do something here.
Play our songbook with the right wordswords on the jumbotrons while operating a zero tolerance on sectarianism.
Although, I'm very much still in the camp that the club should reject the narrative of our enemies.
We should do it as we simply aren't going to win by continuing using 19th Century Terrorist. We know there is an agenda and we know it's all one way but things are only going to get worse for us if we clean up our act.
Sort ourselves out then continue to highlight incidents where we are the victims. Constantly. That's the way to beat this.
We should sing ‘sad orange bastard’ instead of 19th Century Terrorist, no one is bothered about that. Just banter.
It would melt their tiny little minds trying to figure out if they’re offended by it or not.