As long as we wait 28 days to vote I’m not bothered.
Absolutely , about as transparent as tracing paper.Option 1 - Hearts stay up
Option 2 - Hearts stay up
Option 3 - Hearts stay up
Option 4 - Hearts stay up.
Time to vote folks.
Better off in the Welsh league than hereI know it will never happen but we would be better off in England
What is the best strategic decision for Rangers in this?
A. Reject it, as not only will it cost us money by diluting the Premiership money between 2 more clubs, not only is it temporary, but morally it helps validate awarding a title that wasn't won. The option most Rangers fans would want.
B. Accept it, fully expecting it to fall anyway. This keeps the potential legal alliance with the unfairly relegated clubs, plus portrays us as putting individual grievance to one side.
Wonder if Dundee will vote for it
i was looking at the heart forum today,its really bizarre as they seem to think the SPFL look after us and the mentally challengeds, saying stuff like 'they'd never do anything like this to the bigot bros' etc
are they really that thick?
See that’s the kind of thinking that’s seen us fecked over and left on our lonesome, this club that you say stood by us are now quite content to work with a crooked cabal as long as it benefits them, no better than the rest.We are at war with the authorities, Hearts are one of the few clubs that stood with us. Their will be further battles ahead hopefully in the not too distant future. I'm sure our directors will have been appreciative of Hearts support and will give proper consideration to the proposal.
It will be a poorer league without Hearts, we need the bigger clubs in Scotland, otherwise the product declines.
We need competition.
Option 1 - Hearts stay up
Option 2 - Hearts stay up
Option 3 - Hearts stay up
Option 4 - Hearts stay up.
Time to vote folks.
Prepared simply to protect Hearts.
We can not swallow a proposal that means that certain aspects of the League are declared valid while others are not.
On a personal basis, I believe that Hearts would have had a slightly better than 50/50 chance of avoiding relegation if the season wasn't allowed to complete. But that didn't happen due to the drive to award Celtic the title for all sorts of wicked reasons.
The season should have been declared null and void, and that is what the legal action should force.
This is what I'm trying to get my head around. What sort of clusterfuck would this create further down the line.At the beginning she appreciates that not all clubs will take part next season.
lets say QOTS opt out because they can’t play financially, which she says is ok.
After the end of the season, may, 2021, where do QOTS fit back in? And others?
A poorer league without Hearts?It will be a poorer league without Hearts, we need the bigger clubs in Scotland, otherwise the product declines.
We need competition.
It will be a poorer league without Hearts, we need the bigger clubs in Scotland, otherwise the product declines.
We need competition.
Sorry mate, think your wrong on this one, Hearts stance was purely out of self interest, if they hadn't been in the relegation zone they're silence would have been deafening.We are at war with the authorities, Hearts are one of the few clubs that stood with us. Their will be further battles ahead hopefully in the not too distant future. I'm sure our directors will have been appreciative of Hearts support and will give proper consideration to the proposal.