Yes, the John Lundstram one where his arm was at his side.
Absolutely nothing about another example of Celtic getting away with a blatant penalty.
We are absolutely cheated in this country, not only by the referees but a pathetic compliant media.
Will still be the same cheating bastards running VARVAR in Scotland is going to be interesting to say the least.
I can see VAR being very selective
Not entirely true. We are building bridges.Yes indeed. What do Rangers do to prove media bias? NOTHING!
Not entirely true. We are building bridges.
Exactly. I fear VAR will be a disappointment - run similar to the compliance officer role. Very selective.Will still be the same cheating bastards running VAR
VAR is only the solution if it's impartial officials using it. Which it won't be.
Exactly what I was going to say that was 100% a penalty.O'Riley actually blocks a goal bound shot with his arm, which is not in a natural position
Where would it get us?Yes indeed. What do Rangers do to prove media bias? NOTHING!
Exactly. I fear VAR will be a disappointment - run similar to the compliance officer role. Very selective.
Only real way to change is for our club to call it out.
Where would it get us?
only answer is for Rangers fans to withdraw our custom. We have the power.
How can you justify their one not being a penalty?Neither was a penalty
A few articles popped up on my NewsNow timeline. I opened them expecting it to be their penalty handball but it was Lundstram.Hopefully this doesn't come across as being "arsey" but who is discussing it? Nobody at the time on SKY or later on BBC gave it much attention and it was unanimous that it's never a penalty.
Admittedly I've not seen the TV or any papers today.
Ball seemed to hit his arm which was by his side. I thought it hit his back first time I saw it.How can you justify their one not being a penalty?
Cheers, not seen any of them to be fair.A few articles popped up on my NewsNow timeline. I opened them expecting it to be their penalty handball but it was Lundstram.
I think VAR would have gave us both decisions.Neither was a penalty
Why has this not been discussed more.O'Riley actually blocks a goal bound shot with his arm, which is not in a natural position
Honestly mate why do you even waste your time posting utter nonsense like this.Not entirely true. We are building bridges.
Haha ffs mate it’s a joke. Wind your neck in ffs. A lie deary me.Ho
Honestly mate why do you even waste your time posting utter nonsense like this.
Rangers are doing nothing to tackle the out right corruption in this country, but to say we're building bridges is just a lie.
It's as funny as the 7-10 days stuff, forum is clogged up with pish like this.Haha ffs mate it’s a joke. Wind your neck in ffs. A lie deary me.
He's being sarcastic.Ho
Honestly mate why do you even waste your time posting utter nonsense like this.
Rangers are doing nothing to tackle the out right corruption in this country, but to say we're building bridges is just a lie.
See above post, it's boring as %^*& this stuff.He's being sarcastic.
VAR sounds good as it suggests digital forensics but I thought there was still plenty scope for being selective as, aside from offside, it has to be a clear and obvious error and even then the ref gets final say. This is still subjective but the checks and balances against bias should be the media as we can then all see what the ref gets to see. Even then, there have been recent examples where VAR does not show the ref all the angles. There is going to be all kinds still going on.Exactly. I fear VAR will be a disappointment - run similar to the compliance officer role. Very selective.
Only real way to change is for our club to call it out.
The old "dont buy the papers" approach first touted by David Murray years and years ago? Where has that got us?
The vast majority of people dont support Rangers so a total boycott by us, even if it was practicle, wont work. Its a fantasy.
What we need to do is prove the bias. Name and shame them. Call them out.
I genuinely can’t think of any incident where he could have been sent off?!?!The ra filth state of mind numpties were greeting about Kent not being sent off.
Absolutely this, that's my line of thinking since I heard its to be introduced. It will benefit one team only.Will still be the same cheating bastards running VAR
Easily remedied my man put me on your ignore list and your life will be all happy again.See above post, it's boring as %^*& this stuff.
This goes to the heart of it.The comments in this thread so far about VAR being potentially worse than the current set up are bang on. The fact some Rangers supporters can't see it is mind boggling considering their own logic ie "it can't be argued with so it'll help". That's the point. Keep giving them the marginals and then say "we're not bias, we looked at the VAR and that can't be argued with".
It's the intimidation of referees and other match officials that needs dealt with before we do anything else.
The high boot that collided with one of their defenders (think it was Ralston).Am sure Kent was booked for itI genuinely can’t think of any incident where he could have been sent off?!?!
The only person who could have walked was Kyoto in about the first 10 mins with his late tackle on Big John then his deliberate handball. Of course nothing happened and there’s no controversy.
We should have had a pen, not sure which filth player it was but he turned his back (fitting for a player for them) and extended his arm!!
Pen for me
Even the builders of the Danyang-Kunshan Grand Bridge in China managed to build bridges quicker than our board of Directors.Not entirely true. We are building bridges.
By his side?Ball seemed to hit his arm which was by his side. I thought it hit his back first time I saw it.
Yeah but the narrative is always set that we somehow got away with it. Especially with that referee.Neither was a penalty
Watch it you’ll be accused of being boring and a liar.Even the builders of the Danyang-Kunshan Grand Bridge in China managed to build bridges quicker than our board of Directors.