YeahI'm not remembering this O'Riley one? Was it in the 2nd half? I did break the seal and had to go for a slash a couple of times.
I'm not remembering this O'Riley one? Was it in the 2nd half? I did break the seal and had to go for a slash a couple of times.
Which was outstretched.Was a corner. Diving header from Sakala I think was goal bound and blocked by OReillys arm.
A few articles popped up on my NewsNow timeline. I opened them expecting it to be their penalty handball but it was Lundstram.
This goes to the heart of it.
As long as they are able to control the narrative of the MSM, then this current enforced bias will continue.
By enforced bias, I mean the pressure that prevails after any decision concerning either club, where everything Rangers is usually filtered through a lens of Rangers getting the decisions and Celtc being the victim of poor refereeing.
The effect this accumulates is one of referees understanding even subconsciously that they get an easier life if they avoid either giving a decision in favour of Rangers or one against the Filth.
A case in point yesterday was the ridiculous handball given against Wright as Rangers looked to break upfield.
As the noise of anger arose in the Stands of the Jimmy Savile Arena, Beaton suddenly had a quick reconsidering of his own position if Rangers were to go upfield and score, hence no matter the laws of the game which he had instinctively followed, he knew that the priority was to remove himself and his family from a poisonous narrative that may have followed from the incident.
And, let us be honest, who in the MSM is pointing out that Beaton got the handball wrong to the detriment of Rangers?
Yeah
Arfield Screaming for it at the back post
Sky showed 1 whole replay and passed zero comment
If Andy Walker is saying it is not a pen for Celtic then its not a pen.
The O'Riley one with the current laws of the game is given as a pen, some might think that is harsh but if VAR is in play yesterday that is a pen.
%^*& face that commentates with Walker and McCoist, really showed where his allegiances lies yesterday. I would say until about the 15th min we were controlling the game, looking the most likely. Celtic strung 5 passes together Crocker "Celtic are really starting to control the game now". They gift possession away, we get it back and start control it again making a lot more passes than Celtic did before his comment and his comment was "Rangers starting to string some passes together". Like poor wee Rangers have managed to get the ball and pass it, awww wee souls.
If Andy Walker is saying it is not a pen for Celtic then its not a pen.
The O'Riley one with the current laws of the game is given as a pen, some might think that is harsh but if VAR is in play yesterday that is a pen.
%^*& face that commentates with Walker and McCoist, really showed where his allegiances lies yesterday. I would say until about the 15th min we were controlling the game, looking the most likely. Celtic strung 5 passes together Crocker "Celtic are really starting to control the game now". They gift possession away, we get it back and start control it again making a lot more passes than Celtic did before his comment and his comment was "Rangers starting to string some passes together". Like poor wee Rangers have managed to get the ball and pass it, awww wee souls.
Yeah but the narrative is always set that we somehow got away with it. Especially with that referee.
It’s almost like it’s orchestrated
Ho
Honestly mate why do you even waste your time posting utter nonsense like this.
Rangers are doing nothing to tackle the out right corruption in this country, but to say we're building bridges is just a lie.
100% it is a penalty. Blanked and never discussed furtherWhy has this not been discussed more.
This was a proper shout for a penalty.
If I recall correctly, he turns his back to the ball and throws his arms out and stops the goalbound ball in midflight.
If that isn't a handball in the box then nothing is, ... surely?
Fair enough.See above post, it's boring as %^*& this stuff.
This goes to the heart of it.
As long as they are able to control the narrative of the MSM, then this current enforced bias will continue.
By enforced bias, I mean the pressure that prevails after any decision concerning either club, where everything Rangers is usually filtered through a lens of Rangers getting the decisions and Celtc being the victim of poor refereeing.
The effect this accumulates is one of referees understanding even subconsciously that they get an easier life if they avoid either giving a decision in favour of Rangers or one against the Filth.
A case in point yesterday was the ridiculous handball given against Wright as Rangers looked to break upfield.
As the noise of anger arose in the Stands of the Jimmy Savile Arena, Beaton suddenly had a quick reconsidering of his own position if Rangers were to go upfield and score, hence no matter the laws of the game which he had instinctively followed, he knew that the priority was to remove himself and his family from a poisonous narrative that may have followed from the incident.
And, let us be honest, who in the MSM is pointing out that Beaton got the handball wrong to the detriment of Rangers?
Neither was a penalty
You can tell when they benefit from a dodgy decision. Walker and Crocker go silent. They're not sure what to say so keep quiet.
Mmmm lundstrums hands were across his body he not making housman bigger definately not a penalty the celtic incident is more similar to Scott wright's if weights was pulled back then the celtic one was a penalty to its just cause its out the box doesn't seem it more of a foul or notNeither was a penalty
I didn’t see it being discussed until ref watch on Sky. Not even debateable.Yes, the John Lundstram one where his arm was at his side.
Absolutely nothing about another example of Celtic getting away with a blatant penalty.
We are absolutely cheated in this country, not only by the referees but a pathetic compliant media.
Don’t that’s the point. One is being discussed while the other isn’tNeither was a penalty
What did ref watch say? Actually, what hand ball were they discussing?I didn’t see it being discussed until ref watch on Sky. Not even debateable.
Balogun was sent off for similar, although Balogun won the ball first.I thought Ralston could of been red carded for his tackle second half
It's been evident for years. I notice none of them ever mentioned Craig Thomson giving a penalty in the 2011 LCF. He, of course, changed his mind when round on by Celtic players.Exactly. Yes there are 2 linseman who are blatantly at it with no intimidation needed but the rest are just incompetent, unprofessional and poorly trained coupled with they or their families being intimidated in their daily lives.
Any time we start down the conspiracy against us path we are muddying the waters on the SFA and media's behalf, whether our support likes it or not, they're dancing to the tune of people who don't want to fix the issue because they are shitebags. You can't be dismissed as a conspiracy theorists if you point out what John Beaton and his family have went through over some poor refereeing decisions. It's a matter of public record, not a post on InfoWars.
And let's face it, Beatons experience Is the tip of an iceberg that has been growing larger and larger for 20 years.
Lundstrams.What did ref watch say? Actually, what hand ball were they discussing?
Why is O'Riley's not a handball offence?I think possibly the ref got both decisions correct. However surely if only one of these incidents is going to be looked at it has to be the O'Riley one as his arm was outstretched and not in a natural position whereas Lundstrams arm was by his side.
So they analysed Lundstram’s which everyone knew wasn’t a penalty but never talked about O’Riley sticking his arm out and blocking a goal bound shot? Why am I not surprised?Lundstrams.
They all agreed it wasn’t a penalty.
I can’t see any reason, based on the current rules, that it isn’t a penalty. Arm was in an unnatural position, away from his body, not touching the ground and blocked a shot.Why is O'Riley's not a handball offence?
Out of interest.
Their arms are never in a natural position.O'Riley actually blocks a goal bound shot with his arm, which is not in a natural position
Compare it to the Alfie one that if I remember correctly, cost us two points.I can’t see any reason, based on the current rules, that it isn’t a penalty. Arm was in an unnatural position, away from his body, not touching the ground and blocked a shot.
Why is O'Riley's not a handball offence?
Out of interest.
Yes mate.So they analysed Lundstram’s which everyone knew wasn’t a penalty but never talked about O’Riley sticking his arm out and blocking a goal bound shot? Why am I not surprised?
And VAR is going to help us Lol!Yes, the John Lundstram one where his arm was at his side.
Absolutely nothing about another example of Celtic getting away with a blatant penalty.
We are absolutely cheated in this country, not only by the referees but a pathetic compliant media.
It's funny how they have gotten away with 2 handballs in the last 2 old firm games...with not a word uttered about it.
Is the upper arm no longer part of the arm?Looking at the footage and removing my blue tinted specs I am giving him the benefit of the doubt that the ball struck his upper arm/shoulder.
Blue tinted specs back on I'm screaming for a penalty.
I’m dreading it. We will still get very little and the excise will be “it wasn’t clear and obvious”VAR in Scotland is going to be interesting to say the least.
I can see VAR being very selective
What one was this? Anybody have a clip of it or can you tell me what minute it happened?Exactly what I was going to say that was 100% a penalty.
I'm very confused as to where this myth originatedThe biggest controversial decision was the last minute offside that denied us a one on one with their goalie.
Said it before, but it was the other way about it would have been THE talking point of the game, with the officials getting hunted.
It was scandalous. Even with the Goldson booking, you knew he was going to blow for a foul before the ball was kicked, they were desperate for it to end in a draw at the point.
Is the upper arm no longer part of the arm?
If we are being pedantic…I'm very confused as to where this myth originated
Yes, as the ball comes through that COULD happen
But what actually happens is Sakala turns the ball back into a defender and loses it in the tackle - at which time the whistle goes
At no point were we ever "one on one with their goalie"
True. A scandalous decision that would be the theme of the week, were the shoe on the other foot.The biggest controversial decision was the last minute offside that denied us a one on one with their goalie.
Said it before, but it was the other way about it would have been THE talking point of the game, with the officials getting hunted.
It was scandalous. Even with the Goldson booking, you knew he was going to blow for a foul before the ball was kicked, they were desperate for it to end in a draw at the point.