The game at The Chamber of Secrets? He was shite. As he is in most games. Does that make him a cheat?
Unsurprisingly enough you are wrong.' I'mot a ref supporter. I've called them useless, shite etc on many an occasion when their performance merits it.
Secondly, I've never accused them of cheating so I have no need to prove that. The onus would be on those who make the accusations to back up their claims. Using examples of poor decision making does not qualify as evidence.
Likewise, if our management team had evidence of cheating they would have been taken it further. Comments in the heat of the moment are hardly a reliable barometer.
As I've said many a time, show me evidence of a Scottish referee cheating against Rangers and I'll be the first it admit I was wrong.
The floor is still yours to do so.
I can see why you believe you are in a courtroom or always speak like a lawyer or someone from the government because you never answer any questions craigie.
You believe the decision when bates was lucky means theres no cheating or bias in scottish refereeing.
I asked why does one bad decision or possibly even something Clancy missed prove that if you are sure 100s going against Rangers since Gerrard took over cannot be bias, we dont seem to benefit very often.
How does the right honourable gentlemen prove every decision that we dont get is simply cos the guys pesh and nat but that every other call made cannot be bias due to being a fan, being scared of press coverage or the influence and friends Celtic have at the top of scottish football
21 points clear no tims moaning about decisions going against them, no media upset with the standard, no articles on hopeless refs even Lennon cant find anything to complain about. He could have used refs mistakes to deflect from his performance or going on a bender problem is he would have to find something to focus on, there has been absolutely nothing.
Without going back to the 70s can you give us an example of some dreadful refereeing which has resulted in Gerrards Rangers getting the points or the benefit of hopeless refereeing ? how do they switch being shite on and off ?
The floor has been yours to defend Clancy for around a year but you have been silent. You are the only person that thinks he did not cheat in that game the Rangers management were given what 4 game ban for saying it and every single post on his performance since then has suggested bias and it was a crucial game which we won... my neighbour is a tim i spoke to him a few days after the game the first thing he said was shame the players didnt want it as much as the ref.
Is the compliance officer just pesh because they only ever ban our players not any tims ?
Is Doncaster just hopeless and out his depth, and Maxwell too, no way either of them work for Celtic thats tin foil stuff right ?
When Jackson has a go at Stevie G for wearing a mask and not his own club for breaking the rules or going for a session during lockdown, is it just poor journalism ?
When refs were caught cheating in Italy or Germany do you not think there would have been plenty of fans saying yeah but its just mistakes ive met a referee and he was a lovely man. Dishonest refereeing does not happen in our leagues.
I will ask you again seeing as its your courtroom mlord how do you prove a ref made biased decisions at any point unless hes caught taking cash or dumb enough to just admit it ?