I’d play polster from what I’ve seen he looks decent but not been given much of a chance as of yet
He hasn't played full back for months mate.
On the odd occasion he plays, it's in central midfield.
Gerrard clearly doesn't fancy him at full back.
How can anyone come on here and say Polster, honestly?
Mind boggling.
When was the last time Flanagan even got minutes? Did he play against Queens? Patterson for me.
AgreedI think he did enough on Friday night to warrant a start on Weds but think we'll opt for experience at the weekend.
How can anyone come on here and say Polster, honestly?
Mind boggling.
What is all this Flannigan changes the way we play about?
I just don't see that. Not at all.
Not a comment on who should play - just seems to be all over any thread about him. Or is it fashionable to say it perhaps?
good point - it would be refreshing to see it and possibly if the manager was going to err on the side of caution with Flannagan the lads performance on Friday night might see SG give the youngster another run out. As a few have pointed out its the future.Attacking full backs are key to how we play. Flanagan isn’t an attacking full back.
Correct, apart from the spelling of Flanagan.When Flannigan played at LB teams let him have the ball and concentrated on doubling over against Tav.If Flannigan plays at RB the same will apply and teams will double over more easily against Barisic.Our whole system revolves around two attacking fullbacks .At Ibrox we will be on the front foot continually against almost every opponent,so it's now young Patterson's time for me