Bristol_bnose3
Well-Known Member
Fat, mentally challenged shop lifting cunt.
When the club do well they should be praised. However when they do not they should be held to account. The way this has been handled is utterly perplexing and comes across as though we are bungling idiots.How can we be happy that he was given the minimum for what he did, the hurt he caused, the humiliation of one of our players upon the turf of Ibrox? Shocking!
Senses working overtime.Did you write the first two?
This stood out for me straight away.I wonder if, initially, Rangers took Kamara’s Lawyers word that it was the maximum ban - or if Kamara’s Lawyer took Rangers word that it was the maximum ban?
Both have since now either clarified it’s minimum or left any reference to minimum/maximum out.
I’m also still confused by Kamara’s Lawyer’s assertion that Glen’s ban was reduced from 5 games to 3 on Appeal - yet Rangers say they are going to Appeal both Kamara and Roofe’s bans?
Yes he has punched him in the tunnel.
Rangers should have been representing our player with our own lawyers.I wonder if, initially, Rangers took Kamara’s Lawyers word that it was the maximum ban - or if Kamara’s Lawyer took Rangers word that it was the maximum ban?
Both have since now either clarified it’s minimum or left any reference to minimum/maximum out.
I’m also still confused by Kamara’s Lawyer’s assertion that Glen’s ban was reduced from 5 games to 3 on Appeal - yet Rangers say they are going to Appeal both Kamara and Roofe’s bans?
Given Kamara's Lawyer originally claimed that not only was 10 matches the maximum but that was the length of ban he sought, I think it's reasonable to assume he's made a howling arse of things and Rangers have taken their lead from him. I hope I'm misreading the situation but if not it's really amateur stuff and explains the length of ban.I wonder if, initially, Rangers took Kamara’s Lawyers word that it was the maximum ban - or if Kamara’s Lawyer took Rangers word that it was the maximum ban?
Both have since now either clarified it’s minimum or left any reference to minimum/maximum out.
Aye? What happened like?
He got caught stealing frozen mince when he was still playing, early 90s. Not even decent mince.Aye? What happened like?
For stealing mince? Bit harsh but okay.Alan Rough doesn't deserve to live.
Because three games is harsh for the victim of quite disgusting abuse by a fellow professional. A red card on the pitch for violent conduct is a one game ban.Then why are we appealing it?
What a bunch of ignorant barrack room lawyers on this thread. Many of whom were telling us Slavia were liars and Glen didn’t hit the guy.Given Kamara's Lawyer originally claimed that not only was 10 matches the maximum but that was the length of ban he sought, I think it's reasonable to assume he's made a howling arse of things and Rangers have taken their lead from him. I hope I'm misreading the situation but if not it's really amateur stuff and explains the length of ban.
That was my line of thought mate. Compounded by the Appeal confusion.Given Kamara's Lawyer originally claimed that not only was 10 matches the maximum but that was the length of ban he sought, I think it's reasonable to assume he's made a howling arse of things and Rangers have taken their lead from him. I hope I'm misreading the situation but if not it's really amateur stuff and explains the length of ban.
Given Kamara's Lawyer originally claimed that not only was 10 matches the maximum but that was the length of ban he sought, I think it's reasonable to assume he's made a howling arse of things and Rangers have taken their lead from him. I hope I'm misreading the situation but if not it's really amateur stuff and explains the length of ban.
What programme did he say this on?
The sheer scale of the "Rangers and their fans must be hammered for everything" agenda is really quite frightening.
Some people have poisoned minds and it causes them to lose perspective.
UEFA probably have to apply the rules but anyone who actively wants Kamara to get a ban or, even worse, an increased ban obviously doesn't understand the severity of racism and should be ashamed of themselves.
What a bunch of ignorant barrack room lawyers on this thread. Many of whom were telling us Slavia were liars and Glen didn’t hit the guy.
Now we’re in a rage about the club’s statement when10 games is what we always expected.
People moaning and greetin’ and never happy
Would it surprise anyone if they told Kamara's lawyer it was the maximum hoping they wouldn't check?