Boab4
Well-Known Member
I am pointing out an example that proves his point is invalid
It's not invalid because someone wore something different.
I am pointing out an example that proves his point is invalid
In Britain 3 is the traditional number but it varies depending on how tactics evolved within each countryHe did, but that makes no difference to the point that Left backs SHOULD wear 3.
Was 12 in the league for 07/08
My bad sorryYeah! The guy I was quoting said “all Rangers LB should be 3” hence why I said Numan!
New website has new numbers.
Bassey 3
McLaughlin 33
Patterson 16
That’s very positive for Patterson. I still thought Holt was 23 (until now obviously as he’s left). Assume that was changed prior to his loans at Fleetwood and St Johnston.Probaably looking too much into it but maybe a decent indication as to who is in the managers plans and who isn't.
Docherty moved from 23 to 27 and McCrorie now 28.
Murphy given 15 and Patterson given 16.
Murphy I can understand. Patterson will maybe be seen as first choice back up for Tav so makes sense he’s lower. Docherty moving 4 is a strange one and I can’t even remember what McCrorie was when he went on loan!Probaably looking too much into it but maybe a decent indication as to who is in the managers plans and who isn't.
Docherty moved from 23 to 27 and McCrorie now 28.
Murphy given 15 and Patterson given 16.
RM was 17 i’m certain.Murphy I can understand. Patterson will maybe be seen as first choice back up for Tav so makes sense he’s lower. Docherty moving 4 is a strange one and I can’t even remember what McCrorie was when he went on loan!
He was 17 in Gerrard's first season and that was given to Aribo after he went on loan.Murphy I can understand. Patterson will maybe be seen as first choice back up for Tav so makes sense he’s lower. Docherty moving 4 is a strange one and I can’t even remember what McCrorie was when he went on loan!
Barker was seen in the early pre season stuff but hasn't been spotted since.Just been though all the profiles. No pictures for Polster, McCrorie(Ross) and Barker.
McCrorie is clearly at Pompey, but does that mean the other two are for the off?
Just been though all the profiles. No pictures for Polster, McCrorie(Ross) and Barker.
McCrorie is clearly at Pompey, but does that mean the other two are for the off?
That tells me Borna is for the off, or would have moved to 3 I think
New website has new numbers.
Bassey 3
McLaughlin 33
Patterson 16
Tells me he’s for the off lolI wonder why Bornas so keen on 31. Must be his preference.
I wouldn’t look too much into it mate, must be his preference.That tells me Borna is for the off, or would have moved to 3 I think
Number 3 was free when John left.That tells me Borna is for the off, or would have moved to 3 I think
My thoughts exactly.Number 3 was free last summer when John left.
Not until after he’d made his debut playing with 31 IIRC.Number 3 was free last summer when John left.
The fact he is even on the list suggests to me he has been fully promoted to first team.Kennedy’s squad number is down 40 so probably means we’re hoping to start involving him more
Tells me he’s for the off lol
There was no permanent player with number 3 after John left in 18/19 meaning it was free after Worrall returned fo Forrest last summer. If he wanted it in 19/20. Borna didn’t take it, not to worry.Not until after he’d made his debut playing with 31 IIRC.
played 3 for Osijek and croatia so I assumed he’d take it. However it is just a number.
Worrell took number 3 domestically in 18/19 and Barisic signed before him that summer.Not until after he’d made his debut playing with 31 IIRC.
played 3 for Osijek and croatia so I assumed he’d take it. However it is just a number.
We signed Barisic whilst Declan John was still at the club.Worrell took number 3 domestically in 18/19 and Barisic signed before him that summer.
If he wanted to change, number 3 was free last summer.
Number 3 was free last summer and he opted to stay 31.We signed Barisic whilst Declan John was still at the club.
Kent will keep 14 and a new player will get 11, the club held back 14 for him all summer
Did he? Or was it chosen for him?Number 3 was free last summer and he opted to stay 31.
It means nothing that he's decided not to change.
Supposedly a loan target for ICTno mebude in that list. would like to see him have a good season and get a bit of game time in the first team. i also noticed there were a few fringe players photos missing. jordan jones is in there still so maybe hes been given a second chance (if there is anything to look into, that is)
dapo or jones?Supposedly a loan target for ICT
dapo or jones?
Without a doubt.Here's the current squad numbers with the players out of contract removed:
Do you think Hagi and Davis will swap numbers for the new season if Haig signs permanently?
I believe 12 was retired by the spivs for the fans. Should that be rescinded?
I think, more and more players are keeping, requesting, numbers they started with and think have been lucky for them.It was available when he signed and again last summer. I was disappointed he didn’t take it.
On the continent, five is often the left back.3 should always be a left back.
So what number for Balogun?
Hagi needs to be 10 for marketing, madness not to
Balogun has nicked Firth’s number